Jeep Grand Cherokee MOT Results

Registered in 2003
56.7% pass rate
from 758 tests in 2017
(10% better than other 2003 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Jeep Grand Cherokee is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 6.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.9% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.53% fail on Rear lamps (72% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.4% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim (43% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (170% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Fog lamp (170% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.13% fail on Switch
    • 3.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.4% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.53% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.40% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.13% fail on Tell tales
        • 0.13% fail on Switch
    • 3.0% fail on Battery (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.92% fail on Headlamps (81% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Headlamp (83% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.13% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 0.40% fail on Trailer electrical socket (13 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Rear reflectors (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Horn
  • 20% fail on Brakes (22% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 9.1% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.3% fail on Parking brake performance (46% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.92% fail on Brake performance not tested (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Front wheels (66% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.13% fail on Gradient hand brake
      • 0.13% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.13% fail on Brake operation
    • 7.1% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 6.6% fail on Components
        • 4.7% fail on Pipes
        • 2.2% fail on Hoses
        • 0.13% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.66% fail on Leaks
      • 0.40% fail on Operation
    • 5.1% fail on Hub components (61% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Brake pads (62% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.13% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.13% fail on Brake calipers
    • 2.6% fail on Parking brake (160% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Condition (160% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on ABS (100% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.13% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.13% fail on Pedal
        • 0.13% fail on Condition
    • 0.13% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.13% fail on Components
        • 0.13% fail on Pipes
    • 0.13% fail on Locking devices
  • 17% fail on Suspension (19% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 4.7% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage condition
    • 2.8% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 2.8% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.13% fail on Spring mounting
    • 2.5% fail on Suspension arms (46% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (48% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Condition
    • 2.5% fail on Trailing arms (8 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (8 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Condition (18 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment
    • 2.2% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 2.1% fail on Drive shafts (46% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 2.1% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.92% fail on Torque/reaction arms (36 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.92% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (42 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Condition
    • 0.92% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.53% fail on Front
      • 0.40% fail on Rear
    • 0.66% fail on Radius arms (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.66% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.66% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.66% fail on Panhard rods (85 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (143 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.26% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.13% fail on Torsion bars
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment
  • 7.8% fail on Steering (53% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 6.7% fail on Steering system (49% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Track rod end
      • 2.0% fail on Drag link end (25 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Steering damper (80 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Steering box
    • 0.53% fail on Power steering
      • 0.26% fail on Operation
      • 0.13% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.13% fail on Pump
      • 0.13% fail on Other components
    • 0.13% fail on Steering control
      • 0.13% fail on Steering lock
    • 0.13% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.13% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.13% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 5.4% fail on Driver's view of the road (40% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Wipers
    • 0.79% fail on Washers (78% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.79% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.53% fail on Windscreen
  • 4.6% fail on Tyres (49% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Tread depth (45% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Condition (55% better than other 2003 cars)
  • 3.8% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.3% fail on Seat belts (78% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.92% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.79% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.13% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 3.8% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (49% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Exhaust system (61% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Fuel system (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on System (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.79% fail on Emissions (76% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 1.5% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.66% fail on Body condition
    • 0.40% fail on Seats
      • 0.40% fail on Drivers
    • 0.26% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.26% fail on Chassis
    • 0.13% fail on Doors
      • 0.13% fail on Passengers other
  • 1.5% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.53% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.53% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages