Jeep Grand Cherokee MOT Results

Registered in 2002
59.8% pass rate
from 977 tests in 2017
(19% better than other 2002 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Jeep Grand Cherokee is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (21% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.7% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.3% fail on Rear lamps
    • 5.6% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 4.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.2% fail on Direction indicators (56% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Flashing type (52% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 3.5% fail on Individual lamps (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.51% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.10% fail on Side repeaters
      • 0.10% fail on Semaphore
        • 0.10% fail on Tell tales
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim (62% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Battery (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamps (57% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp (58% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.10% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.6% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.10% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.41% fail on Horn
    • 0.31% fail on Rear reflectors (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Trailer electrical socket (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 9.0% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.7% fail on Parking brake performance (49% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Rear wheels (51% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Front wheels (70% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.51% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.10% fail on Gradient hand brake
    • 5.3% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 4.7% fail on Components
        • 3.5% fail on Pipes
        • 2.0% fail on Hoses
        • 0.10% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.92% fail on Leaks (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Hub components
      • 3.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.51% fail on Brake calipers
    • 3.3% fail on ABS (200% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Parking brake (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Condition (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.41% fail on Pedal
        • 0.41% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.10% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.10% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
  • 16% fail on Suspension (27% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.8% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.92% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.20% fail on Attachment
    • 3.9% fail on Drive shafts
      • 3.7% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 3.7% fail on Constant velocity joints
      • 0.20% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.20% fail on Drive shafts
    • 3.1% fail on Suspension arms (36% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (44% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Condition
      • 0.20% fail on Attachment
    • 2.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 2.1% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.10% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 1.7% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.4% fail on Trailing arms (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Condition (11 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.82% fail on Radius arms (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Condition
    • 0.82% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.82% fail on Condition
    • 0.72% fail on Tie bars/rods (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.20% fail on Attachment (24 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Condition
    • 0.41% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.41% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Torque/reaction arms (11 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (13 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Wheel bearings (83% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Front
      • 0.10% fail on Rear
    • 0.20% fail on Panhard rods (21 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (32 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.10% fail on Condition
    • 0.10% fail on Axles
      • 0.10% fail on Swivel joints/housing
  • 7.4% fail on Steering (49% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 6.7% fail on Steering system (54% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Track rod end (48% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Drag link end (23 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.20% fail on Steering box (13 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Free play
        • 0.10% fail on Steering box
    • 0.72% fail on Power steering
      • 0.41% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.20% fail on Pump (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Operation
    • 0.20% fail on Steering control
      • 0.10% fail on Steering lock
      • 0.10% fail on Steering column
    • 0.10% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.10% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.10% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 6.0% fail on Driver's view of the road (36% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Wipers
    • 1.5% fail on Mirrors (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.72% fail on Washers (81% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.51% fail on Windscreen
  • 4.6% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (42% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Exhaust system (39% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Emissions (58% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.72% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.72% fail on System (170% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.72% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 4.4% fail on Tyres (52% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Tread depth (45% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Condition (66% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Size/type
  • 3.0% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 1.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.0% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.61% fail on Condition
      • 0.10% fail on Attachment
    • 1.2% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.1% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.10% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 2.1% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.82% fail on Body condition
    • 0.82% fail on Seats (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Drivers (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Passengers
    • 0.41% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.41% fail on Chassis
    • 0.10% fail on Doors
      • 0.10% fail on Passengers other
  • 1.4% fail on Road Wheels (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  • 0.92% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.92% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.20% fail on Towbars
    • 0.20% fail on Towbar (16 times worse than other 2002 cars)

Search Good Garages