Jeep Grand Cherokee MOT Results

Registered in 2000
54.2% pass rate
from 603 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Jeep Grand Cherokee is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 7.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.5% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.7% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.17% fail on All position lamps
    • 7.5% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 7.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 6.8% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.5% fail on Headlamp
    • 4.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.0% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.66% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.50% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.5% fail on Battery (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.8% fail on Fog lamp
    • 1.3% fail on Horn
    • 0.33% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.33% fail on Trailer electrical socket (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.33% fail on Lamp
  • 22% fail on Suspension
    • 11% fail on Drive shafts (160% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 11% fail on Front drive shafts (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 11% fail on Constant velocity joints (160% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.33% fail on Drive shafts
    • 4.5% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.5% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.33% fail on Linkage condition
    • 4.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 3.8% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.50% fail on Spring mounting
    • 2.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.50% fail on Condition
    • 1.8% fail on Trailing arms (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Condition (14 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.5% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.66% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.66% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.50% fail on Torque/reaction arms (18 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (22 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Panhard rods (21 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (33 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Wheel bearings (83% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Front
      • 0.17% fail on Rear
    • 0.33% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices (9 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.17% fail on Location
    • 0.17% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.17% fail on Condition
      • 0.17% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.17% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.17% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 21% fail on Brakes
    • 10% fail on Brake performance
      • 8.6% fail on Parking brake performance (100% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Rear wheels (52% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Brake operation (10 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.50% fail on Front wheels (85% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.17% fail on Gradient hand brake
    • 7.6% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 6.5% fail on Components
        • 4.1% fail on Pipes
        • 2.8% fail on Hoses
      • 1.3% fail on Leaks (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Operation
    • 5.5% fail on Hub components (84% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 2.5% fail on Brake discs (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Brake back plates (11 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Parking brake (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Condition (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on ABS (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.33% fail on Pedal
        • 0.17% fail on Condition
        • 0.17% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.33% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.33% fail on Components (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Servos (10 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.17% fail on Cable
    • 0.17% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.17% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
  • 8.3% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.1% fail on Wipers
    • 1.5% fail on Washers (59% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.00% fail on Windscreen
    • 1.00% fail on Mirrors
  • 8.1% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 5.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.2% fail on Emissions (66% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.66% fail on Cap
      • 0.17% fail on Tank
      • 0.17% fail on Pipe
      • 0.17% fail on System
    • 0.66% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 6.5% fail on Steering
    • 5.6% fail on Steering system
      • 3.2% fail on Track rod end
      • 2.7% fail on Drag link end (21 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Power steering
      • 0.17% fail on Pump
      • 0.17% fail on Other components
    • 0.33% fail on Locking devices (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Steering operation
  • 4.5% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.0% fail on Body condition
    • 1.3% fail on Seats (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Drivers (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Passengers
    • 0.66% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.66% fail on Chassis
    • 0.66% fail on Doors
      • 0.66% fail on Passengers other
  • 4.1% fail on Tyres (51% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.00% fail on Condition (73% better than other 2000 cars)
  • 2.7% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (47% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.7% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.33% fail on Condition
      • 0.17% fail on Requirements
      • 0.17% fail on Attachment
    • 0.33% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (80% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (79% better than other 2000 cars)
  • 1.5% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.33% fail on Towbars
    • 0.33% fail on Towbar (20 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  • 0.33% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.33% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages