Jeep Grand Cherokee MOT Results

Registered in 1999
52.3% pass rate
from 459 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Jeep Grand Cherokee is unusually good or bad.

  • 29% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 6.8% fail on Headlamps (59% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 6.8% fail on Headlamp (65% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 6.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.6% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.0% fail on Rear lamps
    • 6.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 6.1% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 3.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.4% fail on Individual lamps
        • 1.1% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.22% fail on Tell tales
    • 3.1% fail on Battery (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.5% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.65% fail on Horn
    • 0.65% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.22% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.22% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.22% fail on Lamp
      • 0.22% fail on Tell tale
  • 22% fail on Suspension
    • 9.8% fail on Drive shafts (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 9.8% fail on Front drive shafts (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 9.8% fail on Constant velocity joints (160% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 4.1% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.3% fail on Attachment (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.22% fail on Linkage condition
    • 2.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.65% fail on Condition
      • 0.22% fail on Attachment
    • 2.0% fail on Prescribed areas (68% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Component mounting (64% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Spring mounting
    • 1.7% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.3% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.65% fail on Condition (26 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.3% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.1% fail on Front
      • 0.22% fail on Rear
    • 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
    • 1.1% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.87% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Attachment
    • 0.87% fail on Torque/reaction arms (30 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (29 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Attachment
    • 0.44% fail on Coil springs (84% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Condition (84% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Panhard rods (13 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (21 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.22% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.22% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.22% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.22% fail on Axles
      • 0.22% fail on Axle beam
    • 0.22% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 22% fail on Brakes (27% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 14% fail on Brake performance (42% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 8.5% fail on Parking brake performance (83% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.0% fail on Brake performance not tested (8 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.65% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.44% fail on Brake operation (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.22% fail on Gradient hand brake
    • 6.8% fail on Hub components (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Brake pads (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Brake discs (180% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Brake calipers (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Brake drums
    • 6.1% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 5.7% fail on Components
        • 3.7% fail on Pipes
        • 2.0% fail on Hoses
        • 0.44% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.44% fail on Leaks
      • 0.22% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.22% fail on Operation
    • 2.8% fail on ABS
    • 1.7% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.22% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.22% fail on Additional braking devices
    • 0.22% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.22% fail on Cable
    • 0.22% fail on Restricted movement
  • 11% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 8.3% fail on Exhaust system (60% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Emissions (52% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.87% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.65% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.65% fail on Cap
  • 8.7% fail on Steering (92% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 7.6% fail on Steering system (97% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Track rod end
      • 2.6% fail on Drag link end (16 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Steering damper (46 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.22% fail on Free play
        • 0.22% fail on Steering box
      • 0.22% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.22% fail on Other components
        • 0.22% fail on Steering component
    • 1.1% fail on Power steering
      • 0.65% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.22% fail on Operation
      • 0.22% fail on Rams
    • 0.44% fail on Locking devices (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  • 7.6% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.1% fail on Wipers
    • 2.2% fail on Washers
    • 1.5% fail on Mirrors (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Windscreen
  • 5.7% fail on Tyres
    • 3.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.22% fail on Valve stem
  • 4.6% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 2.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.65% fail on Condition
    • 2.0% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 2.0% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 2.4% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.1% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.1% fail on Chassis
    • 0.44% fail on Body condition (79% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Doors
      • 0.44% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.44% fail on Seats
      • 0.22% fail on Passengers
      • 0.22% fail on Drivers
  • 1.5% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.65% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.65% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages