Jeep Grand Cherokee MOT Results
Registered in 199952.3% pass rate
from 459 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Jeep Grand Cherokee is unusually good or bad.
-
29% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 9.2% fail on Headlamp aim
-
6.8% fail on
Headlamps
(59% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 6.8% fail on Headlamp (65% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
6.5% fail on
Position lamps
- 4.6% fail on Front lamps
- 2.0% fail on Rear lamps
- 6.5% fail on Stop lamp
- 6.1% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
3.3% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.3% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.4% fail on Individual lamps
- 1.1% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.22% fail on Tell tales
-
3.3% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.1% fail on Battery (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.5% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.65% fail on Horn
- 0.65% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.22% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
0.22% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.22% fail on Lamp
- 0.22% fail on Tell tale
-
22% fail on
Suspension
-
9.8% fail on
Drive shafts
(150% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
9.8% fail on
Front drive shafts
(150% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 9.8% fail on Constant velocity joints (160% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
9.8% fail on
Front drive shafts
(150% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
6.3% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 4.1% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 1.3% fail on Attachment (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.22% fail on Linkage condition
-
2.4% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.65% fail on Condition
- 0.22% fail on Attachment
-
2.0% fail on
Prescribed areas
(68% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Component mounting (64% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Spring mounting
- 1.7% fail on Front suspension joints
-
1.3% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.65% fail on Condition (26 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
1.3% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.1% fail on Front
- 0.22% fail on Rear
-
1.3% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 1.3% fail on Condition
-
1.1% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.87% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Attachment
-
0.87% fail on
Torque/reaction arms
(30 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (29 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Attachment
-
0.44% fail on
Coil springs
(84% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Condition (84% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.44% fail on
Panhard rods
(13 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (21 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.22% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.22% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.22% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.22% fail on
Axles
- 0.22% fail on Axle beam
- 0.22% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
-
9.8% fail on
Drive shafts
(150% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
22% fail on
Brakes
(27% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
(42% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 8.5% fail on Parking brake performance (83% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Rear wheels
- 2.0% fail on Brake performance not tested (8 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Front wheels
- 0.65% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.44% fail on Brake operation (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.22% fail on Gradient hand brake
-
6.8% fail on
Hub components
(140% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Brake pads (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Brake discs (180% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.87% fail on Brake calipers (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Brake drums
-
6.1% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
5.7% fail on
Components
- 3.7% fail on Pipes
- 2.0% fail on Hoses
- 0.44% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.44% fail on Leaks
- 0.22% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.22% fail on Operation
-
5.7% fail on
Components
- 2.8% fail on ABS
-
1.7% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.7% fail on Condition
- 0.22% fail on Electronic stability system
- 0.22% fail on Additional braking devices
-
0.22% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.22% fail on Cable
- 0.22% fail on Restricted movement
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
(42% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
11% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 8.3% fail on Exhaust system (60% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Emissions (52% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.87% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.65% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.65% fail on Cap
-
8.7% fail on
Steering
(92% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
7.6% fail on
Steering system
(97% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Track rod end
- 2.6% fail on Drag link end (16 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.87% fail on Steering damper (46 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Ball joint
-
0.22% fail on
Free play
- 0.22% fail on Steering box
- 0.22% fail on Steering arm
-
0.22% fail on
Other components
- 0.22% fail on Steering component
-
1.1% fail on
Power steering
- 0.65% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.22% fail on Operation
- 0.22% fail on Rams
- 0.44% fail on Locking devices (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
7.6% fail on
Steering system
(97% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
7.6% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 4.1% fail on Wipers
- 2.2% fail on Washers
- 1.5% fail on Mirrors (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Windscreen
-
5.7% fail on
Tyres
- 3.5% fail on Tread depth
- 2.4% fail on Condition
- 0.22% fail on Valve stem
-
4.6% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
2.8% fail on
Seat belts
- 2.2% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.65% fail on Condition
-
2.0% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 2.0% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
2.8% fail on
Seat belts
-
2.4% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
1.1% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 1.1% fail on Chassis
- 0.44% fail on Body condition (79% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.44% fail on
Doors
- 0.44% fail on Passengers other
-
0.44% fail on
Seats
- 0.22% fail on Passengers
- 0.22% fail on Drivers
-
1.1% fail on
Vehicle structure
-
1.5% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.5% fail on Registration plate
-
0.65% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.65% fail on Attachment