Jeep Compass MOT Results

Registered in 2012
75.6% pass rate
from 780 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 cars and highlighted areas where the Jeep Compass is unusually good or bad.

  • 8.6% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 3.6% fail on Position lamps (140% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Front lamps (190% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Rear lamps
    • 1.9% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.77% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.13% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.26% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.26% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.13% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.13% fail on Individual lamps
    • 0.13% fail on Battery
    • 0.13% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 7.2% fail on Suspension (99% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Suspension arms (6 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (6 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment
    • 1.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment
    • 1.3% fail on Tie bars/rods (88 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (97 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.51% fail on Front suspension joints (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.38% fail on Rear (5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.13% fail on Condition
    • 0.13% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.13% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.13% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.13% fail on Condition
  • 5.4% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.0% fail on Wipers
    • 1.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.13% fail on Windscreen
  • 5.0% fail on Tyres
    • 2.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.13% fail on Valve stem
  • 4.9% fail on Brakes
    • 3.3% fail on Hub components
      • 2.9% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.77% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.51% fail on Service brake performance (6 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.38% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.26% fail on Rear wheels
    • 0.38% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.38% fail on Condition
    • 0.26% fail on ABS
    • 0.13% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.13% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.13% fail on Components
        • 0.13% fail on Hoses
    • 0.13% fail on Restricted movement
  • 0.77% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.64% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Condition
      • 0.13% fail on Requirements
    • 0.13% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.13% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 0.38% fail on Steering
    • 0.26% fail on Steering system
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.13% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.13% fail on Power steering
      • 0.13% fail on Operation
  • 0.38% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.26% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.26% fail on Cap
    • 0.13% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.26% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.13% fail on Body condition
    • 0.13% fail on Doors
      • 0.13% fail on Passengers front
  • 0.26% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.26% fail on Registration plate
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages