Jeep Compass MOT Results
Registered in 201275.6% pass rate
from 780 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 cars and highlighted areas where the Jeep Compass is unusually good or bad.
-
8.6% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
-
3.6% fail on
Position lamps
(140% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Front lamps (190% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Rear lamps
- 1.9% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
1.5% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.5% fail on Headlamp
- 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim
-
0.77% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.64% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.13% fail on Tell tale
-
0.26% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.26% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.13% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.13% fail on Individual lamps
-
0.26% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.13% fail on Battery
- 0.13% fail on Stop lamp
- 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
3.6% fail on
Position lamps
(140% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
7.2% fail on
Suspension
(99% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Suspension arms
(6 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (6 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Attachment
-
1.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Attachment
-
1.3% fail on
Tie bars/rods
(88 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (97 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.51% fail on Front suspension joints (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.38% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.38% fail on Rear (5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.13% fail on Condition
-
0.13% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.13% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.13% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.13% fail on Condition
-
4.2% fail on
Suspension arms
(6 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
5.4% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 4.0% fail on Wipers
- 1.9% fail on Washers
- 0.13% fail on Windscreen
-
5.0% fail on
Tyres
- 2.7% fail on Tread depth
- 2.3% fail on Condition
- 0.13% fail on Valve stem
-
4.9% fail on
Brakes
-
3.3% fail on
Hub components
- 2.9% fail on Brake pads
- 0.77% fail on Brake discs
-
1.3% fail on
Brake performance
- 0.51% fail on Service brake performance (6 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Front wheels
- 0.38% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.26% fail on Rear wheels
-
0.38% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.38% fail on Condition
- 0.26% fail on ABS
- 0.13% fail on Electronic stability system
-
0.13% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
0.13% fail on
Components
- 0.13% fail on Hoses
-
0.13% fail on
Components
- 0.13% fail on Restricted movement
-
3.3% fail on
Hub components
-
0.77% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.64% fail on
Seat belts
(2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.51% fail on Condition
- 0.13% fail on Requirements
-
0.13% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.13% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
0.64% fail on
Seat belts
(2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.38% fail on
Steering
-
0.26% fail on
Steering system
- 0.13% fail on Ball joint
- 0.13% fail on Track rod end
-
0.13% fail on
Power steering
- 0.13% fail on Operation
-
0.26% fail on
Steering system
-
0.38% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
-
0.26% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.26% fail on Cap
- 0.13% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.26% fail on
Fuel system
-
0.26% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 0.13% fail on Body condition
-
0.13% fail on
Doors
- 0.13% fail on Passengers front
-
0.26% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.26% fail on Registration plate
Read the Honest John Review
-
Jeep Compass (2011 - 2014)
Has full time AWD. Strong chain cam 2.2 litre diesel engine. Decent handling and grip.