Jeep Compass MOT Results

Registered in 2009
41.5% pass rate
from 65 tests in 2020
(61% worse than other 2009 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Jeep Compass is unusually good or bad.

  • 37% fail on Suspension (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 23% fail on Suspension arms (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 17% fail on Ball joint (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 9.2% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Shock absorbers (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.1% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 1.5% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 3.1% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 3.1% fail on Sub-frames (15 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Sub-frame
      • 1.5% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.1% fail on Other suspension component (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Ball joint (20 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Springs
      • 1.5% fail on Coil springs
        • 1.5% fail on Coil spring
    • 1.5% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 1.5% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.5% fail on Suspension rods
      • 1.5% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 17% fail on Visibility (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 7.7% fail on Wipers
    • 7.7% fail on Washers
    • 1.5% fail on View to rear
      • 1.5% fail on Mirrors
  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.2% fail on Position lamp
    • 6.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.5% fail on Stop lamp
  • 15% fail on Brakes
    • 7.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 6.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 6.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 3.1% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 3.1% fail on Brake discs
    • 3.1% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 1.5% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
    • 3.1% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 1.5% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 1.5% fail on Brake fluid
    • 1.5% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 1.5% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 9.2% fail on Steering (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 7.7% fail on Steering linkage components (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 7.7% fail on Track rod end (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Steering play
      • 1.5% fail on Steering rack
  • 7.7% fail on Tyres
    • 4.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.1% fail on Condition
  • 3.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Registration plates (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 1.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 1.5% fail on Exhaust system
  • 1.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.5% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 1.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 1.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.5% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.5% fail on Catalyst emissions
  • 1.5% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.5% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages