Jeep Cherokee MOT Results
Registered in 200961.7% pass rate
from 193 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Jeep Cherokee is unusually good or bad.
-
17% fail on
Brakes
(90% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
9.8% fail on
Brake performance
(110% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
7.8% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 5.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (30 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
2.6% fail on
Rbt
- 2.6% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
2.6% fail on
Rbt
-
2.1% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.1% fail on
Rbt
- 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
-
2.1% fail on
Rbt
-
1.0% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
1.0% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 1.0% fail on Service brake performance (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
1.0% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.52% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
7.8% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
5.7% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
5.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(150% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 5.2% fail on Brake pads (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.6% fail on Brake discs
-
5.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(150% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 1.6% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 1.6% fail on Electronic stability control (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Parking brake control
- 1.0% fail on Lever
-
0.52% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.52% fail on Hand lever
- 0.52% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.52% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.52% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
9.8% fail on
Brake performance
(110% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
14% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
5.2% fail on
Headlamps
- 5.2% fail on Headlamp
- 3.1% fail on Stop lamp
- 2.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
2.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
-
2.1% fail on
Electrical equipment
(4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Horn
- 0.52% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.52% fail on Battery(ies)
-
1.0% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.0% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.0% fail on Side repeaters
-
1.0% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.52% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.52% fail on Switch
-
0.52% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.52% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.52% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.52% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
5.2% fail on
Headlamps
-
8.3% fail on
Visibility
- 6.2% fail on Washers
- 2.1% fail on Wipers
-
7.8% fail on
Suspension
(47% better than other 2009 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.1% fail on Ball joint
-
2.1% fail on
Other suspension component
(6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Ball joint (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
1.6% fail on
Springs
(73% better than other 2009 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Coil springs
(73% better than other 2009 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Coil spring (82% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Mounting
-
1.6% fail on
Coil springs
(73% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.52% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.52% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.52% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
3.1% fail on
Suspension arms
-
4.1% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
2.1% fail on
Transmission
-
1.6% fail on
Prop shafts
(16 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Joints (14 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Bearing housing
-
0.52% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.52% fail on Joints
-
1.6% fail on
Prop shafts
(16 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.0% fail on
Doors
-
0.52% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.52% fail on Door condition
-
0.52% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.52% fail on Door condition
-
0.52% fail on
Driver's door
-
0.52% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.52% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
2.1% fail on
Transmission
-
3.1% fail on
Tyres
- 2.6% fail on Tread depth
- 0.52% fail on Condition
-
2.1% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
1.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
1.0% fail on
Spark ignition
- 1.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.52% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.52% fail on Emissions not tested
-
1.0% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.52% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.52% fail on Transmission oil leaks
-
1.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
1.6% fail on
Road Wheels
- 1.6% fail on Attachment
-
1.0% fail on
Steering
-
0.52% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.52% fail on Track rod end
-
0.52% fail on
Steering play
- 0.52% fail on Steering rack
-
0.52% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
1.0% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 1.0% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.52% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.52% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review
-
Jeep Cherokee (2008 - 2011)
Tough and very capable off-road, manual and auto both pull 2,800kg, emissions of 222g/km with manual, leather comes as standard.