Jeep Cherokee MOT Results
Registered in 200559.0% pass rate
from 1,389 tests in 2017
(9.1% better than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Jeep Cherokee is unusually good or bad.
-
21% fail on
Brakes
(56% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
13% fail on
Brake performance
(88% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 9.9% fail on Parking brake performance (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Rear wheels (68% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.79% fail on Front wheels
- 0.43% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.22% fail on Gradient hand brake (32 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Brake operation (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.072% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
5.8% fail on
Hub components
(68% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.5% fail on Brake pads (74% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Brake discs (75% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.072% fail on Brake drums
-
5.3% fail on
Parking brake
(5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 5.3% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.2% fail on ABS (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(44% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Components
(55% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Hoses
- 0.29% fail on Pipes (90% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.29% fail on Leaks
-
1.6% fail on
Components
(55% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.14% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.14% fail on Cable
- 0.072% fail on Electronic stability system
-
0.072% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.072% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
-
13% fail on
Brake performance
(88% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
21% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 7.6% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
6.1% fail on
Position lamps
- 5.4% fail on Front lamps
- 0.65% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.14% fail on All position lamps
- 3.8% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.0% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.0% fail on Headlamp
- 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim (59% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Battery (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(120% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Fog lamp (93% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Switch (11 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.072% fail on Tell tale
-
1.3% fail on
Direction indicators
(55% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Flashing type
(55% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.14% fail on All direction indicators
-
1.3% fail on
Flashing type
(55% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Rear reflectors (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Horn
- 0.14% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.14% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.072% fail on Electrical wiring
-
6.6% fail on
Steering
(63% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
5.7% fail on
Steering system
(59% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 5.5% fail on Track rod end (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Steering rack
-
0.86% fail on
Power steering
(140% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Operation
- 0.29% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.14% fail on Rams (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.072% fail on Drive system
- 0.072% fail on Other components
-
5.7% fail on
Steering system
(59% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Suspension
(73% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Suspension arms
(67% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (65% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.0% fail on Front
-
0.72% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.58% fail on Component mounting
- 0.14% fail on Spring mounting
- 0.072% fail on Subframe mounting
-
0.58% fail on
Drive shafts
(84% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Front drive shafts
(88% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Constant velocity joints (88% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.072% fail on Universal joint
- 0.072% fail on Drive shafts
-
0.43% fail on
Front drive shafts
(88% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Front suspension joints (60% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Shock absorbers
(79% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Condition (79% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Coil springs
(96% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Condition (96% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.14% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.072% fail on Condition
-
0.14% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.14% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.14% fail on
Torque/reaction arms
(7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.072% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.072% fail on Attachment
-
0.14% fail on
Axles
- 0.072% fail on Axle beam
- 0.072% fail on King pins
-
0.072% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.072% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.072% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.072% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
1.4% fail on
Suspension arms
(67% better than other 2005 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(33% better than other 2005 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Wipers
- 0.94% fail on Washers (71% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Windscreen
- 0.36% fail on Mirrors
- 0.072% fail on Bonnet
-
4.5% fail on
Tyres
(48% better than other 2005 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Tread depth (34% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Condition (66% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.072% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
- 0.072% fail on Size/type
- 0.072% fail on Valve stem
-
4.0% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 2.8% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.79% fail on Emissions (61% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.36% fail on Cap
- 0.072% fail on Hose
- 0.14% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.94% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.94% fail on Attachment (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.79% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 0.29% fail on Body condition
-
0.29% fail on
Seats
- 0.29% fail on Drivers
-
0.22% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.22% fail on Chassis
-
0.58% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(76% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.50% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.36% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.14% fail on Condition
-
0.072% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.072% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
0.50% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.29% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.29% fail on Registration plate
-
0.072% fail on
Towbars
- 0.072% fail on Towbar
Read the Honest John Review
-
Jeep Cherokee (2002 - 2007)
Better than the previous Cherokee model. Cute old-school looks.