Jeep Cherokee MOT Results
Registered in 200260.3% pass rate
from 764 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Jeep Cherokee is unusually good or bad.
-
16% fail on
Suspension
-
9.7% fail on
Suspension arms
(76% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Suspension arm (10 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Pins and bushes
- 2.4% fail on Ball joint
- 0.92% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.26% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 5.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (75% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.79% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.39% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Ball joint
- 0.13% fail on Other suspension component
-
0.52% fail on
Springs
(85% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.52% fail on
Coil springs
(85% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Coil spring (92% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Mounting
-
0.52% fail on
Coil springs
(85% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.39% fail on
Axles
- 0.26% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
- 0.13% fail on Axle
-
0.39% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(92% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
-
0.26% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.13% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.13% fail on Ball joint
-
0.26% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.13% fail on Suspension rod
- 0.13% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.13% fail on Shock absorbers
-
9.7% fail on
Suspension arms
(76% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
14% fail on
Brakes
-
8.5% fail on
Brake performance
-
4.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 3.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 1.0% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
-
3.5% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.4% fail on
Rbt
- 2.5% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.13% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.13% fail on Service brake performance
-
3.4% fail on
Rbt
-
2.2% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
2.1% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 2.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.39% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.13% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
2.1% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
1.6% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.6% fail on
Rbt
- 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.13% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
1.6% fail on
Rbt
- 0.26% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
4.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
-
3.4% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(130% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Anti-lock braking system (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.3% fail on Brake pads
-
0.52% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.26% fail on Brake discs
- 0.26% fail on Brake drums (12 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.13% fail on Lever
-
1.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.92% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.65% fail on Hand lever
- 0.26% fail on Pedal
-
0.92% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.92% fail on Lever
-
0.79% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.79% fail on Brake fluid (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.65% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.39% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.52% fail on Rigid brake pipes (85% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
8.5% fail on
Brake performance
-
13% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
3.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.39% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
3.1% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.1% fail on Headlamp
- 3.0% fail on Stop lamp
- 2.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.6% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.4% fail on Battery(ies) (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Electrical wiring
-
1.4% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.79% fail on
Direction indicators
(65% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.79% fail on
Flashing type
(65% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.79% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.79% fail on
Flashing type
(65% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Rear reflectors (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.26% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.26% fail on Position lamp
-
3.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
11% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 4.7% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.2% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(96% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Transmission
(52% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Prop shafts
(5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.79% fail on Joints (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Prop shaft (12 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.65% fail on
Drive shafts
(81% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Joints (81% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Prop shafts
(5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Fuel system
(150% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.92% fail on Tank (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.92% fail on
Seats
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.92% fail on Driver's seat (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.79% fail on
Chassis
- 0.65% fail on Chassis condition
- 0.13% fail on Strengthening plate
-
0.26% fail on
Body
- 0.26% fail on Other body component
-
0.26% fail on
Cabs
- 0.26% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.13% fail on Bumpers
-
0.13% fail on
Towbar
- 0.13% fail on Other towbar components
- 0.13% fail on Vehicle structure
- 0.13% fail on Passenger compartment
-
6.0% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(67% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
5.0% fail on
Seat belts
(140% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Condition
- 1.0% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.13% fail on
Airbags
- 0.13% fail on Drivers airbag
-
5.0% fail on
Seat belts
(140% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
5.9% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
3.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(41% better than other 2002 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Spark ignition
(56% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Catalyst emissions (59% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.79% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.65% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (71% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.92% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.52% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.13% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
-
2.6% fail on
Spark ignition
(56% better than other 2002 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Fluid leaks
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Engine oil leaks (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Transmission oil leaks
- 0.13% fail on Other leaks
-
0.13% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.13% fail on Sound deadening material
-
3.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(41% better than other 2002 cars)
-
5.6% fail on
Steering
-
3.8% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 3.3% fail on Track rod end
- 0.52% fail on Ball joint
-
1.3% fail on
Steering gear
- 1.2% fail on Steering rack
- 0.13% fail on Steering box
-
1.0% fail on
Power steering
(160% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.79% fail on Pipes and hoses (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Other components
- 0.13% fail on Pump
-
3.8% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
5.0% fail on
Visibility
(38% better than other 2002 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Wipers
- 1.4% fail on Washers (60% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.39% fail on
View to rear
- 0.39% fail on Mirrors
-
0.26% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.26% fail on Windscreen
-
3.1% fail on
Tyres
(45% better than other 2002 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Tread depth
- 1.0% fail on Condition (59% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Size/type
-
1.3% fail on
Road Wheels
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.39% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.39% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review
-
Jeep Cherokee (2002 - 2007)
Better than the previous Cherokee model. Cute old-school looks.