MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Jeep » Cherokee » 2002

Jeep Cherokee MOT Results

Registered in 2002
60.4% pass rate
from 1,380 tests in 2017
(20% better than other 2002 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Jeep Cherokee is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (24% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 5.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.4% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.65% fail on Rear lamps (67% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim (53% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Battery (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Stop lamp (56% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamps (56% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp (59% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.072% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.072% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.072% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.072% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.072% fail on Switch
    • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.1% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.14% fail on Switch
      • 0.072% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.87% fail on Direction indicators (68% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Flashing type (68% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.51% fail on Individual lamps (70% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.14% fail on Side repeaters (81% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Rear reflectors (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.14% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.14% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 13% fail on Brakes (22% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on Brake performance (27% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.8% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.2% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.94% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.58% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.22% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.7% fail on Hub components
      • 2.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.80% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.43% fail on Wheel cylinder (20 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Brake drums (20 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.072% fail on Brake calipers
    • 3.6% fail on Hydraulic systems (43% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Components (49% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Hoses
        • 0.87% fail on Pipes (80% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.072% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.072% fail on Servos
        • 0.072% fail on Pump
      • 0.65% fail on Leaks
      • 0.29% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 1.9% fail on ABS (72% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.36% fail on Restricted movement
  • 8.6% fail on Suspension (61% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Suspension arms (47% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (54% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Condition
      • 0.22% fail on Attachment
    • 2.0% fail on Prescribed areas (38% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.14% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 1.7% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.4% fail on Front
      • 0.29% fail on Rear (73% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Trailing arms (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Condition (25 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.072% fail on Attachment
    • 0.58% fail on Anti-roll bars (90% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (95% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Attachment
      • 0.14% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (86% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.51% fail on Front suspension joints (67% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.51% fail on Drive shafts (88% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Front drive shafts (88% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.51% fail on Constant velocity joints (88% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Shock absorbers (70% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Condition (70% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Coil springs (93% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Condition (95% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.072% fail on Location
    • 0.22% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.14% fail on Condition (23 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.072% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.22% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.22% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.22% fail on Torque/reaction arms (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (9 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.14% fail on Condition
      • 0.072% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.072% fail on Axles
      • 0.072% fail on Swivel joints/housing
  • 7.0% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 4.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.3% fail on Emissions
    • 1.3% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.80% fail on Tank (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Cap
      • 0.14% fail on System
    • 0.72% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 6.2% fail on Driver's view of the road (35% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Wipers
    • 1.5% fail on Washers (59% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.65% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.51% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.072% fail on Bonnet
  • 5.9% fail on Tyres (36% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.4% fail on Condition (64% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Valve stem
  • 4.1% fail on Steering
    • 3.4% fail on Steering system
      • 3.2% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.22% fail on Steering rack (77% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Power steering
      • 0.22% fail on Operation
      • 0.22% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.14% fail on Other components
      • 0.072% fail on Rams
    • 0.14% fail on Steering control
      • 0.14% fail on Steering lock (11 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Steering operation
  • 4.0% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.8% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.65% fail on Condition
      • 0.072% fail on Attachment
    • 0.94% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.87% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.072% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 1.8% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.87% fail on Body condition
    • 0.65% fail on Seats
      • 0.58% fail on Drivers (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.072% fail on Passengers
    • 0.29% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.29% fail on Chassis
    • 0.072% fail on Body security
  • 1.4% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.87% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.87% fail on Attachment (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages