Jeep Cherokee MOT Results

Registered in 1999
64.7% pass rate
from 529 tests in 2020
(21% better than other 1999 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Jeep Cherokee is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 9.1% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 4.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 3.4% fail on Service brake imbalance (91% worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 0.95% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.38% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (8 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.2% fail on Rbt
          • 3.4% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 3.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (55% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (9 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.95% fail on Rbt
          • 0.95% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.38% fail on Decelerometer (24 times worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 0.19% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.19% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.38% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.7% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.5% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.19% fail on Brake drums
      • 1.5% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.5% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.5% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.5% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 1.3% fail on Parking brake control (180% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Lever (180% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.76% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.57% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.38% fail on Pedal
      • 0.19% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.19% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.19% fail on Servos
    • 0.19% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.19% fail on Master cylinder
    • 0.19% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.19% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.19% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.19% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.19% fail on Other braking system component
  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.19% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.5% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.76% fail on Horn
      • 0.38% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.19% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.19% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 1.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.1% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.95% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.95% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.76% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.19% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.38% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.38% fail on Switch
    • 0.38% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.38% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.19% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 12% fail on Suspension (30% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.8% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.57% fail on Linkage
      • 0.19% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.19% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 2.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.9% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.9% fail on Suspension arms (62% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.38% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.19% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.1% fail on Other suspension component
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.95% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.95% fail on Springs
      • 0.57% fail on Coil springs (73% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.57% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.38% fail on Leaf springs (41 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Shackle bracket
        • 0.19% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
    • 0.38% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.19% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.19% fail on Axles
      • 0.19% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
  • 8.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.0% fail on Transmission
      • 3.0% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.8% fail on Joints
        • 0.19% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.19% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.19% fail on Prop shaft
    • 0.76% fail on Seats
      • 0.76% fail on Driver's seat (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.57% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.57% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.57% fail on Chassis
      • 0.57% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.57% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.38% fail on Tank
      • 0.19% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.57% fail on Body
      • 0.57% fail on Panel
    • 0.38% fail on Doors
      • 0.38% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.38% fail on Door condition
    • 0.19% fail on Bumpers
  • 6.2% fail on Visibility
    • 3.0% fail on Wipers
    • 2.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.76% fail on View to rear
      • 0.76% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.38% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.38% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.19% fail on Driver's view
  • 4.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (56% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Exhaust emissions (62% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Spark ignition (62% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on Catalyst emissions (60% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.57% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.19% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.19% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.19% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
    • 0.95% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.57% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.57% fail on Other leaks (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.19% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 3.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.5% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.76% fail on Condition
    • 1.5% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.19% fail on Airbags
      • 0.19% fail on Passengers airbag
  • 2.3% fail on Steering
    • 0.95% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.57% fail on Track rod end (73% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.19% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.95% fail on Power steering
      • 0.57% fail on Other components
      • 0.19% fail on Operation
      • 0.19% fail on Rams
    • 0.19% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.19% fail on Steering box
    • 0.19% fail on Steering column
  • 1.3% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.3% fail on Tyres (77% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.95% fail on Condition
    • 0.38% fail on Tread depth (89% better than other 1999 cars)
  • 0.38% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.38% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages