Jaguar XKR MOT Results

Registered in 2009
80.2% pass rate
from 655 tests in 2020
(48% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Jaguar XKR is unusually good or bad.

  • 4.9% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (62% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim (55% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim (51% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (42% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Stop lamp (91% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.15% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.15% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.15% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.15% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.15% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.15% fail on Side repeaters
  • 4.1% fail on Brakes (51% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Mechanical brake components (44% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Brake linings and pads (34% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Brake pads (34% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Brake discs and drums (62% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.46% fail on Brake discs (61% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Brake performance (68% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.76% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (58% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.61% fail on Rbt (sp) (64% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 0.46% fail on Service brake performance (80% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.46% fail on Rbt (80% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.46% fail on Service brake performance (76% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Parking brake performance (61% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.31% fail on Rbt (60% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.15% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.15% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.15% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.15% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.15% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 0.46% fail on Flexible brake hoses (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Parking brake control (17% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Electronic parking brake (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (45% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Electronic stability control (81% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.15% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.15% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 4.1% fail on Suspension (69% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Suspension arms (54% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.92% fail on Pins and bushes (52% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Anti-roll bars (47% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (3.6% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Ball joint dust cover (16% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.15% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 0.46% fail on Springs (90% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Coil springs (90% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.46% fail on Coil spring (90% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Suspension rods (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Ball joint dust cover (19 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.15% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.15% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.15% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 3.4% fail on Visibility (40% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Wipers (33% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Washers (48% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.15% fail on Windscreen
  • 3.2% fail on Tyres (52% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Condition (13% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.61% fail on Tread depth (84% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 2.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.15% fail on Condition
  • 0.76% fail on Identification of the vehicle (69% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.76% fail on Registration plates (69% worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.61% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (84% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.61% fail on Exhaust emissions (84% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Spark ignition (74% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.46% fail on Catalyst emissions (61% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.46% fail on Body, chassis, structure (89% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Exhaust system (76% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.46% fail on Road Wheels (3.4% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.31% fail on Steering (85% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Steering linkage components (81% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Track rod end (80% better than other 2009 cars)

Search Good Garages