Jaguar XKR MOT Results
Registered in 200979.2% pass rate
from 665 tests in 2021
(47% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Jaguar XKR is unusually good or bad.
-
5.7% fail on
Tyres
- 3.8% fail on Condition
- 1.8% fail on Tread depth
- 0.30% fail on Size/type
-
5.4% fail on
Suspension
(63% better than other 2009 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Suspension arms
(55% better than other 2009 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Pins and bushes (85% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Ball joint
-
1.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(65% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.60% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
1.2% fail on
Springs
(79% better than other 2009 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Coil springs
(79% better than other 2009 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Coil spring (79% better than other 2009 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Coil springs
(79% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.75% fail on
Suspension rods
(11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Ball joint dust cover (30 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.30% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.30% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.15% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.15% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
2.1% fail on
Suspension arms
(55% better than other 2009 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(58% better than other 2009 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim
- 1.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.90% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.90% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.90% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.90% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.60% fail on
Headlamps
(81% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (22 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Headlamp
- 0.45% fail on Stop lamp (87% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Direction indicators
(85% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Flashing type
(85% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.30% fail on
Flashing type
(85% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.15% fail on Horn
-
2.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
2.9% fail on
Brakes
(67% better than other 2009 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Brake performance
(71% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.75% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.60% fail on Rbt (sp) (69% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.45% fail on
Service brake performance
(82% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.45% fail on
Rbt
(81% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Service brake performance (78% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.45% fail on
Rbt
(81% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.45% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.30% fail on
Rbt
- 0.30% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.15% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.15% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.30% fail on
Rbt
-
0.15% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.15% fail on
Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.15% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.15% fail on
Plate brake tester (sp)
-
0.75% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
-
0.90% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(70% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.75% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.75% fail on Brake pads
-
0.15% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.15% fail on Brake discs
-
0.75% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.30% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.30% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.15% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.15% fail on Electronic stability control
-
1.4% fail on
Brake performance
(71% better than other 2009 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Visibility
(54% better than other 2009 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Washers
- 1.2% fail on Wipers
-
2.0% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 1.8% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.15% fail on Condition
-
1.4% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(69% better than other 2009 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(67% better than other 2009 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.75% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.45% fail on Catalyst emissions
-
0.15% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.15% fail on NOx sensor
-
1.4% fail on
Spark ignition
-
1.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(67% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.75% fail on
Steering
(68% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.75% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.75% fail on Track rod end
-
0.75% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
0.60% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.60% fail on Registration plates
-
0.45% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(90% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Engine mounting
(5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Engine mounting condition (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.15% fail on Tank
-
0.30% fail on
Engine mounting
(5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.45% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.45% fail on Attachment