Jaguar XKR MOT Results
Registered in 200372.0% pass rate
from 511 tests in 2021
(38% better than other 2003 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Jaguar XKR is unusually good or bad.
-
8.4% fail on
Brakes
(40% better than other 2003 cars)
-
4.9% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Anti-lock braking system (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Electronic stability control
-
3.1% fail on
Brake performance
(59% better than other 2003 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 2.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.59% fail on
Service brake performance
(80% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.59% fail on
Rbt
(80% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.59% fail on Service brake performance (76% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.59% fail on
Rbt
(80% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.39% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.20% fail on
Rbt
- 0.20% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.20% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.20% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.20% fail on
Rbt
-
2.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 1.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes (69% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.39% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.39% fail on Lever
-
0.39% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(86% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.20% fail on Brake pads
-
0.20% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.20% fail on Brake discs
-
0.20% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.20% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.20% fail on Pedal
-
0.20% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.20% fail on Brake fluid
-
4.9% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
8.0% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(53% better than other 2003 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim
-
2.3% fail on
Hazard warning
(16 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Switch (16 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Headlamps
(67% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Headlamp (75% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.59% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
0.98% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
(16 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.98% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (23 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.78% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.78% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.78% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.78% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.59% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (76% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Stop lamp (92% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.39% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.39% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.39% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.39% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
2.7% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
7.8% fail on
Suspension
(54% better than other 2003 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.59% fail on Ball joint (76% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Suspension arm
- 1.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 1.2% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.98% fail on
Springs
(75% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.98% fail on
Coil springs
(75% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.98% fail on Coil spring (75% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.98% fail on
Coil springs
(75% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.98% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.98% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.78% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(84% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.39% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.20% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.20% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
-
0.59% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.39% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.20% fail on Shock absorbers
-
3.7% fail on
Suspension arms
-
6.3% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
6.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
6.1% fail on
Spark ignition
- 4.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 2.0% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.59% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.20% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.20% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
6.1% fail on
Spark ignition
-
6.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.5% fail on
Visibility
(44% better than other 2003 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Wipers
- 1.8% fail on Washers
- 0.20% fail on Bonnet
-
0.20% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.20% fail on Windscreen
-
0.20% fail on
View to rear
- 0.20% fail on Mirrors
-
3.9% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(58% better than other 2003 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(140% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (150% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.59% fail on
Chassis
- 0.59% fail on Chassis condition
- 0.59% fail on Exhaust system (83% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.59% fail on Floor (17 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Bumpers
-
0.20% fail on
Transmission
-
0.20% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.20% fail on Joints
-
0.20% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.20% fail on
Body
- 0.20% fail on Panel
-
2.2% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(140% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Tyres
- 1.8% fail on Condition
- 1.8% fail on Tread depth
-
2.3% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 1.4% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.98% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.78% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.20% fail on Condition
-
0.78% fail on
Steering
(82% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.39% fail on
Steering linkage components
(88% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Track rod end (87% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.20% fail on Steering rack
- 0.20% fail on Steering column
-
0.39% fail on
Steering linkage components
(88% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.39% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.39% fail on Registration plates
-
0.20% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.20% fail on Attachment