Jaguar XKR MOT Results

Registered in 2002
68.8% pass rate
from 565 tests in 2017
(37% better than other 2002 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Jaguar XKR is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Suspension (32% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 3.7% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 2.1% fail on Component mounting
      • 1.6% fail on Subframe mounting (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.7% fail on Condition
    • 2.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (62% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (65% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.35% fail on Linkage condition
    • 1.9% fail on Coil springs (53% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Condition (52% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.2% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.71% fail on Front
      • 0.53% fail on Rear
    • 1.1% fail on Sub-frames (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Attachment (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.71% fail on Drive shafts (84% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.35% fail on Universal joint (140 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.35% fail on Drive shafts
  • 9.7% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (64% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim (49% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Hazard warning (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Switch (10 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.4% fail on Tell tale (17 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Fog lamp
    • 1.1% fail on Headlamps (78% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Headlamp (81% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.18% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.18% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.18% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 0.88% fail on Registration plate lamp (88% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.53% fail on Position lamps (93% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Front lamps (94% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Rear lamps
    • 0.53% fail on Stop lamp (92% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.53% fail on Direction indicators (80% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Flashing type (80% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.53% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.18% fail on Battery
    • 0.18% fail on Horn
  • 9.6% fail on Brakes (44% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Brake performance (46% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.3% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.18% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.18% fail on Front wheels
    • 2.7% fail on Hydraulic systems (58% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Components (58% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Pipes (51% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.53% fail on Hoses
      • 0.18% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.18% fail on Leaks
    • 1.9% fail on ABS
    • 1.2% fail on Hub components (62% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.35% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.71% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.71% fail on Condition
    • 0.18% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.18% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.18% fail on Cable
    • 0.18% fail on Restricted movement
  • 5.7% fail on Tyres (38% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Condition
    • 2.5% fail on Tread depth (56% better than other 2002 cars)
  • 5.0% fail on Driver's view of the road (48% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Wipers (48% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.18% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.18% fail on Mirrors
  • 3.7% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (53% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Emissions
    • 1.8% fail on Exhaust system (61% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.35% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.18% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.18% fail on Cap
  • 3.0% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.1% fail on Body condition
    • 0.88% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.88% fail on Chassis
    • 0.18% fail on Doors
      • 0.18% fail on Drivers
    • 0.18% fail on Seats
      • 0.18% fail on Drivers
  • 2.7% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 1.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.18% fail on Condition
    • 1.2% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.2% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 1.4% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.71% fail on Steering (86% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.53% fail on Steering system (88% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.18% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.18% fail on Power steering
      • 0.18% fail on Operation
  • 0.53% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.35% fail on Condition
    • 0.18% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages