Jaguar XKR MOT Results

Registered in 1999
71.1% pass rate
from 630 tests in 2020
(37% better than other 1999 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Jaguar XKR is unusually good or bad.

  • 10% fail on Suspension (40% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.1% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.16% fail on Suspension arm
    • 2.7% fail on Sub-frames (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.32% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.16% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.3% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.48% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.32% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.16% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.16% fail on Springs
      • 0.16% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.16% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.16% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 9.8% fail on Brakes (31% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.8% fail on Brake performance (53% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.16% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.79% fail on Service brake performance (74% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.79% fail on Rbt (73% better than other 1999 cars)
          • 0.63% fail on Service brake performance (74% better than other 1999 cars)
          • 0.16% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.48% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.48% fail on Rbt
          • 0.32% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.16% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.16% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.16% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.16% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.16% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.16% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 2.1% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 2.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.79% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 1.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.79% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.79% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.32% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.32% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.32% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.16% fail on Cable
        • 0.16% fail on Pivot
    • 0.48% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.48% fail on Lever
    • 0.32% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.32% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.16% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.16% fail on Pedal
  • 9.8% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (44% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.32% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim (62% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim (63% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.48% fail on Switch (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.16% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.1% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.95% fail on Horn
      • 0.16% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.95% fail on Position lamps (64% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.95% fail on Position lamp (64% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.63% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.48% fail on Stop lamp (90% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.16% fail on Switch
  • 5.2% fail on Visibility
    • 2.9% fail on Wipers
    • 2.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.63% fail on View to rear
      • 0.63% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.32% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.32% fail on Windscreen
  • 5.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (41% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Exhaust emissions (38% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on Spark ignition
        • 4.4% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.79% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 4.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure (58% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Chassis
      • 1.7% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.1% fail on Exhaust system (70% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.95% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.95% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.16% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.79% fail on Floor (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Transmission (91% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Drive shafts (90% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Joints (90% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.16% fail on Pipe
    • 0.16% fail on Seats
      • 0.16% fail on Driver's seat
  • 3.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.1% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 1.7% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 2.9% fail on Tyres (50% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Condition
    • 1.4% fail on Tread depth (59% better than other 1999 cars)
  • 1.6% fail on Steering (61% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.79% fail on Steering linkage components (69% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Track rod end (77% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.32% fail on Prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Steering column (12 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.16% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.16% fail on Power steering
      • 0.16% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.16% fail on Steering play
      • 0.16% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.3% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages