Jaguar XK8 MOT Results
Registered in 199869.3% pass rate
from 1,160 tests in 2021
(20% better than other 1998 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 cars and highlighted areas where the Jaguar XK8 is unusually good or bad.
-
11% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
3.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.26% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
2.8% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.2% fail on Headlamp
- 0.52% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 2.2% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.2% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.8% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.26% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.086% fail on All direction indicators
-
2.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.78% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.78% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
(3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.69% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.086% fail on Main beam tell-tale
-
0.69% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.69% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.69% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.69% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.43% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.26% fail on Horn
- 0.17% fail on Battery(ies)
-
0.26% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.26% fail on Switch
-
3.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
11% fail on
Brakes
-
4.9% fail on
Brake performance
(33% better than other 1998 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 3.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.086% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
- 0.086% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
-
0.95% fail on
Service brake performance
(66% better than other 1998 cars)
-
0.95% fail on
Rbt
(65% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.86% fail on Service brake performance (62% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.086% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.95% fail on
Rbt
(65% better than other 1998 cars)
-
0.95% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.86% fail on
Rbt
- 0.78% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.17% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.086% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.086% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.86% fail on
Rbt
- 0.43% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.26% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(91% better than other 1998 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(94% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.086% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.086% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.086% fail on
Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.086% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.17% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(94% better than other 1998 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
-
4.1% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Anti-lock braking system (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.95% fail on Electronic stability control (4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Electronic braking system (11 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.86% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.69% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.69% fail on Brake pads
-
0.17% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.086% fail on Cable
- 0.086% fail on Clevis joint
-
0.086% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.086% fail on Brake discs
-
0.69% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.43% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.43% fail on Lever
- 0.26% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.086% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.086% fail on Hand lever
-
0.086% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.086% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
4.9% fail on
Brake performance
(33% better than other 1998 cars)
-
10% fail on
Suspension
(24% better than other 1998 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
3.7% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.4% fail on Pins and bushes (83% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.86% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.69% fail on Ball joint
- 0.17% fail on Suspension arm
- 1.9% fail on Wheel bearings
-
1.7% fail on
Sub-frames
(160% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.086% fail on Pins and bushes
-
1.2% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(52% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.34% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.17% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.086% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.086% fail on Ball joint
- 0.086% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
-
0.60% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.34% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.17% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.086% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.17% fail on
Springs
(91% better than other 1998 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Coil springs
(91% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Coil spring (90% better than other 1998 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Coil springs
(91% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.086% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.086% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.086% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
5.3% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(33% better than other 1998 cars)
-
5.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(32% better than other 1998 cars)
-
4.9% fail on
Spark ignition
(30% better than other 1998 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.86% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.17% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.17% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.086% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.086% fail on Oxygen sensor
-
0.17% fail on
Emission control equipment
-
4.9% fail on
Spark ignition
(30% better than other 1998 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.17% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.17% fail on Other leaks
-
5.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(32% better than other 1998 cars)
-
5.0% fail on
Visibility
- 2.6% fail on Wipers
- 2.3% fail on Washers
-
0.26% fail on
View to rear
- 0.26% fail on Mirrors
-
0.17% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.17% fail on Windscreen
- 0.086% fail on Bonnet
-
4.3% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(55% better than other 1998 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 1.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.086% fail on
Sub-frame
- 0.086% fail on Sub-frame condition
-
1.4% fail on
Chassis
- 1.4% fail on Chassis condition
- 0.60% fail on Exhaust system (80% better than other 1998 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Seats
- 0.34% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.26% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.17% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.086% fail on Pipe
-
0.086% fail on
Doors
-
0.086% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.086% fail on Door condition
-
0.086% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.086% fail on Floor
-
0.086% fail on
Cabs
- 0.086% fail on Prescribed areas
-
1.8% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
-
2.9% fail on
Tyres
- 1.8% fail on Tread depth
- 1.1% fail on Condition
- 0.17% fail on Size/type
-
1.6% fail on
Steering
(56% better than other 1998 cars)
-
0.86% fail on
Steering linkage components
(57% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Track rod end (65% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Ball joint
- 0.086% fail on Locking devices
-
0.43% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.43% fail on Steering rack
-
0.34% fail on
Power steering
- 0.086% fail on Operation
- 0.086% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.086% fail on Rams
- 0.086% fail on Other components
-
0.86% fail on
Steering linkage components
(57% better than other 1998 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(62% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.78% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.69% fail on
Seat belts
(76% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.69% fail on Prescribed areas (71% better than other 1998 cars)
-
0.086% fail on
Airbags
- 0.086% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.95% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.95% fail on Registration plates
-
0.17% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.17% fail on Attachment
-
0.086% fail on
Speedometer and speed limiter
- 0.086% fail on Speedometer