Jaguar XK MOT Results

Registered in 2010
80.4% pass rate
from 623 tests in 2020
(44% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Jaguar XK is unusually good or bad.

  • 6.1% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (53% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (15 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Headlamp (82% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.96% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.96% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.96% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.64% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.64% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.32% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.32% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.16% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.16% fail on Horn
  • 4.7% fail on Tyres
    • 3.0% fail on Condition
    • 1.8% fail on Tread depth (52% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 3.5% fail on Suspension (67% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.96% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.32% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.48% fail on Suspension rods (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Ball joint dust cover (25 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.16% fail on Springs
      • 0.16% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.16% fail on Coil spring
  • 3.4% fail on Visibility
    • 2.7% fail on Wipers
    • 0.64% fail on Washers (72% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 1.6% fail on Brakes (78% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.64% fail on Mechanical brake components (80% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Brake linings and pads (81% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.48% fail on Brake pads (81% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.16% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.48% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.48% fail on Electronic parking brake (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.16% fail on Master cylinder
      • 0.16% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.32% fail on Brake performance (90% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.32% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 0.16% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.16% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 1.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (61% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.1% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.96% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.32% fail on Catalyst emissions
  • 0.80% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.64% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.16% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.16% fail on Condition
  • 0.64% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.64% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.48% fail on Steering (74% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.48% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.32% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.16% fail on Drag link end
  • 0.32% fail on Body, chassis, structure (90% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.16% fail on Body
      • 0.16% fail on Panel
  • 0.16% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.16% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages