Jaguar XK MOT Results

Registered in 2008
81.4% pass rate
from 623 tests in 2017
(50% better than other 2008 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Jaguar XK is unusually good or bad.

  • 6.7% fail on Tyres
    • 5.3% fail on Condition
    • 1.8% fail on Tread depth (59% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Size/type
    • 0.16% fail on Valve stem
  • 6.1% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (67% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.96% fail on Headlamp (68% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest (6 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.48% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (7 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.16% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim (66% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Position lamps (74% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Front lamps (67% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Stop lamp (67% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.64% fail on Registration plate lamp (87% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.64% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.64% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.64% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.32% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.16% fail on Horn
    • 0.16% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 4.0% fail on Suspension (70% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.16% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.96% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.96% fail on Condition
    • 0.80% fail on Tie bars/rods (7 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (6 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Condition
    • 0.32% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.16% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.16% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 3.2% fail on Brakes (60% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 1.1% fail on Components
        • 1.1% fail on Hoses (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Hub components (63% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake pads
    • 0.64% fail on Brake performance (82% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 0.32% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.32% fail on Electronic parking brake (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on ABS
  • 3.2% fail on Driver's view of the road (45% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Wipers
    • 0.48% fail on Washers (80% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Mirrors
  • 0.64% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.64% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.64% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 0.48% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.48% fail on Condition
  • 0.32% fail on Steering (80% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Steering system
      • 0.32% fail on Track rod end
  • 0.32% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.32% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.16% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.16% fail on Seats
      • 0.16% fail on Passengers
  • 0.16% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.16% fail on Emissions
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages