Jaguar XJ MOT Results

Registered in 2010
81.2% pass rate
from 1,530 tests in 2020
(45% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Jaguar XJ is unusually good or bad.

  • 7.1% fail on Tyres
    • 3.9% fail on Condition
    • 3.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.065% fail on Size/type
    • 0.065% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
  • 4.1% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (69% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.0% fail on Headlamp aim (65% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Headlamp aim (62% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.92% fail on Headlamps (68% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.065% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.065% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.20% fail on Position lamps (90% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Position lamp (90% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.13% fail on Horn
    • 0.065% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.065% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.065% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.065% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.065% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.065% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.065% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 3.8% fail on Visibility
    • 2.4% fail on Wipers
    • 1.4% fail on Washers
    • 0.065% fail on Driver's view
  • 2.5% fail on Suspension (76% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.98% fail on Suspension arms (69% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.13% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.065% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.065% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.59% fail on Anti-roll bars (80% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Linkage ball joints (71% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (80% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.065% fail on Linkage
    • 0.52% fail on Springs (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Coil springs (86% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.52% fail on Coil spring (86% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Suspension rods (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint (15 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.13% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.065% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.065% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.13% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Operation (50 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.065% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.065% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.065% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 1.3% fail on Road Wheels (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.72% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.59% fail on Attachment
  • 1.2% fail on Brakes (83% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.59% fail on Mechanical brake components (82% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Brake linings and pads (84% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.39% fail on Brake pads (84% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Brake discs and drums (74% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Brake discs (74% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Brake performance (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Service brake performance (88% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Rbt (88% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.20% fail on Service brake performance (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (85% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Rbt (sp) (84% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.065% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.065% fail on Rbt
          • 0.065% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
    • 0.13% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.13% fail on Electronic parking brake
    • 0.065% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.065% fail on Pedal
    • 0.065% fail on Low pressure warning
      • 0.065% fail on Full power hydraulic systems
    • 0.065% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.065% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.065% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.065% fail on Electronic braking system
  • 0.85% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (70% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.72% fail on Exhaust emissions (73% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Compression ignition (62% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.13% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (81% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.065% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.065% fail on Particulate filter
      • 0.26% fail on Spark ignition (82% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.13% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.065% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.065% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
    • 0.065% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.065% fail on Undertray
  • 0.72% fail on Body, chassis, structure (77% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Doors (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Other passenger's door (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.46% fail on Door condition (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Exhaust system (86% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.065% fail on Undertray
  • 0.52% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.52% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.46% fail on Steering (75% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.26% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.13% fail on Steering linkage components (91% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.065% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.065% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.065% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.065% fail on Universal joint
  • 0.39% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.20% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.20% fail on Condition
    • 0.20% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
Read the Honest John Review

  • Jaguar XJ (2010 - 2019)
    A characterful alternative to the go-to German luxury saloons and far more engaging to drive. Diesel offers low emissions and tax but is very strong. Excellent overall refinement.

    Search Good Garages