Jaguar XJ MOT Results
Registered in 200572.0% pass rate
from 346 tests in 2017
(38% better than other 2005 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Jaguar XJ is unusually good or bad.
-
13% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(44% better than other 2005 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
2.9% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.3% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.29% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.29% fail on Side repeaters
-
2.9% fail on
Flashing type
-
2.6% fail on
Position lamps
(58% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Front lamps
- 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim (68% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Headlamps
(67% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.87% fail on Headlamp (79% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.58% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
(5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Horn
- 0.29% fail on Stop lamp
-
9.0% fail on
Brakes
-
3.2% fail on
Brake performance
(53% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Front wheels
- 1.2% fail on Rear wheels
- 0.87% fail on Parking brake performance (77% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Brake imbalance
-
2.9% fail on
Hub components
- 2.3% fail on Brake pads
- 0.29% fail on Brake discs
- 0.29% fail on Brake calipers
-
2.0% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
2.0% fail on
Components
- 1.7% fail on Pipes
- 0.87% fail on Hoses
-
2.0% fail on
Components
-
1.2% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.2% fail on Electronic parking brake (19 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Restricted movement
- 0.29% fail on Electronic stability system
-
0.29% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
-
0.29% fail on
Components
- 0.29% fail on Pipes
-
0.29% fail on
Components
- 0.29% fail on ABS
-
3.2% fail on
Brake performance
(53% better than other 2005 cars)
-
7.5% fail on
Suspension
(61% better than other 2005 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Suspension arms
- 4.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.29% fail on Attachment
-
2.0% fail on
Tie bars/rods
(9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(63% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (64% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.29% fail on Linkage condition
-
0.87% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.87% fail on Condition
- 0.58% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.29% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.29% fail on Rear
-
4.6% fail on
Suspension arms
-
6.9% fail on
Tyres
- 4.3% fail on Condition
- 2.6% fail on Tread depth
- 0.29% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
-
6.9% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 4.9% fail on Wipers
- 2.0% fail on Washers
- 0.29% fail on Bonnet
-
0.87% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.58% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.58% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
0.29% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.29% fail on Requirements
-
0.58% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
-
0.87% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(83% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.87% fail on Emissions
- 0.29% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.58% fail on
Steering
(86% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.58% fail on
Steering system
(84% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Track rod end
-
0.58% fail on
Steering system
(84% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.29% fail on Registration plate