Jaguar XJ MOT Results

Registered in 2002
66.8% pass rate
from 641 tests in 2020
(30% better than other 2002 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Jaguar XJ is unusually good or bad.

  • 12% fail on Suspension (31% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (82% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Suspension arms (39% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.5% fail on Sub-frames (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Sub-frame (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (71% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.94% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.31% fail on Linkage ball joints (81% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.16% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.62% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.16% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.31% fail on Springs (91% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.16% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.16% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.16% fail on Axles
      • 0.16% fail on Axle
    • 0.16% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 12% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (51% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 11% fail on Exhaust emissions (52% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 11% fail on Spark ignition (74% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 7.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 4.2% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.94% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.16% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.16% fail on NOx sensor
        • 0.16% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.16% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.16% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.94% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.62% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.31% fail on Other leaks
  • 7.6% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (63% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim (45% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.16% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamps (61% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp (64% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.9% fail on Stop lamp (68% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.78% fail on Direction indicators (67% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Flashing type (67% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.78% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.16% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.47% fail on Position lamps (87% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Position lamp (86% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (10 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.31% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.31% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.16% fail on Switch
    • 0.16% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.16% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.16% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 7.5% fail on Brakes (51% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Brake performance (61% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (52% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (50% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.94% fail on Service brake performance (71% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.94% fail on Rbt (70% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.62% fail on Service brake performance (76% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.31% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.78% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.62% fail on Rbt (sp) (69% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.31% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.31% fail on Service brake imbalance (78% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.16% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.47% fail on Parking brake performance (73% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.31% fail on Rbt (82% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.31% fail on Parking brake performance (79% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.16% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
    • 2.2% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 2.2% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 2.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.78% fail on Mechanical brake components (77% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Brake linings and pads (72% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.62% fail on Brake pads (72% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.16% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.16% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.16% fail on Lever
  • 7.0% fail on Body, chassis, structure (33% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure (200% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Exhaust system (55% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.78% fail on Chassis
      • 0.78% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.78% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.62% fail on Pipe (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Tank
    • 0.62% fail on Body
      • 0.47% fail on Panel
      • 0.16% fail on Other body component
    • 0.62% fail on Doors
      • 0.31% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.31% fail on Door condition
      • 0.31% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.31% fail on Door condition
    • 0.47% fail on Floor (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.16% fail on Transmission
      • 0.16% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.16% fail on Drive shaft
  • 5.0% fail on Tyres
    • 3.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.7% fail on Condition
  • 4.4% fail on Visibility (49% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Wipers (45% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.16% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.16% fail on Windscreen
  • 1.7% fail on Steering (63% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.94% fail on Steering linkage components (72% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Track rod end (79% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.47% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.47% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.31% fail on Prescribed areas (14 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  • 1.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (64% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.94% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.31% fail on Condition
    • 0.16% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.16% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.16% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.16% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.16% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages