Jaguar XJ MOT Results

Registered in 2000
67.6% pass rate
from 290 tests in 2017
(34% better than other 2000 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Jaguar XJ is unusually good or bad.

  • 13% fail on Suspension (41% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 7.9% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 4.1% fail on Component mounting
      • 4.1% fail on Subframe mounting (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Spring mounting
    • 1.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.4% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.0% fail on Attachment (17 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.0% fail on Anti-roll bars (79% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.69% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.34% fail on Front
      • 0.34% fail on Rear
    • 0.34% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.34% fail on Condition
    • 0.34% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.34% fail on Attachment
    • 0.34% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.34% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.34% fail on Front suspension joints
  • 11% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (55% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.4% fail on Registration plate lamp (59% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.1% fail on Stop lamp (63% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.69% fail on Position lamps (89% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.34% fail on Rear lamps
    • 0.69% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.69% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.69% fail on Individual lamps
    • 0.34% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.34% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.34% fail on Horn
  • 8.3% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 5.5% fail on Emissions
    • 2.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.7% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.34% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.34% fail on Pipe
  • 7.6% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (100% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Body condition (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.69% fail on Doors
      • 0.69% fail on Drivers
    • 0.34% fail on Seats
      • 0.34% fail on Drivers
  • 6.9% fail on Brakes (60% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Brake performance (74% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.0% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.69% fail on Rear wheels (83% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Hydraulic systems (68% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Components (66% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Pipes
        • 0.69% fail on Hoses
    • 2.1% fail on ABS
    • 0.69% fail on Hub components
      • 0.34% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.34% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.34% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.34% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
  • 5.2% fail on Tyres
    • 2.8% fail on Condition
    • 1.7% fail on Tread depth (66% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.69% fail on Size/type
  • 4.8% fail on Driver's view of the road (50% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Wipers
    • 2.8% fail on Washers
  • 4.5% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 4.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 4.1% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.34% fail on Condition
  • 2.1% fail on Steering
    • 2.1% fail on Steering system
      • 1.4% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.34% fail on Free play
        • 0.34% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.34% fail on Steering arm

Search Good Garages