Jaguar XF MOT Results
Registered in 201886.3% pass rate
from 6,024 tests in 2021
(16% worse than other 2018 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2018 cars and highlighted areas where the Jaguar XF is unusually good or bad.
-
5.0% fail on
Visibility
(55% worse than other 2018 cars)
- 4.5% fail on Wipers (93% worse than other 2018 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Washers (53% better than other 2018 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.12% fail on Windscreen
-
4.0% fail on
Tyres
(18% worse than other 2018 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Condition
- 1.7% fail on Tread depth
- 0.050% fail on Size/type
-
2.2% fail on
Brakes
(57% worse than other 2018 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(94% worse than other 2018 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(96% worse than other 2018 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Brake pads (97% worse than other 2018 cars)
-
0.32% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.32% fail on Brake discs
-
1.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(96% worse than other 2018 cars)
-
0.37% fail on
Brake performance
-
0.13% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.13% fail on
Rbt
- 0.13% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.13% fail on
Rbt
- 0.12% fail on Brake performance not tested (3 times worse than other 2018 cars)
-
0.066% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.033% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.017% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.017% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.033% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (12 times worse than other 2018 cars)
-
0.033% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.050% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.033% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.017% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
-
0.13% fail on
Service brake performance
- 0.066% fail on Flexible brake hoses (3 times worse than other 2018 cars)
-
0.050% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.050% fail on Pedal
-
0.050% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
(4 times worse than other 2018 cars)
- 0.050% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (5 times worse than other 2018 cars)
-
0.017% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.017% fail on Electronic parking brake
-
0.017% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.017% fail on Electronic stability control
-
1.9% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(94% worse than other 2018 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(36% better than other 2018 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.017% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.30% fail on
Headlamps
- 0.25% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (4 times worse than other 2018 cars)
- 0.050% fail on Headlamp (85% better than other 2018 cars)
-
0.083% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.083% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.066% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.017% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.083% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.050% fail on Stop lamp (74% better than other 2018 cars)
-
0.033% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(81% better than other 2018 cars)
-
0.033% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.033% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.033% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.033% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.033% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.017% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.017% fail on Horn
-
1.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
0.46% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
0.46% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.25% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.20% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.033% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
- 0.017% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.22% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.18% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.033% fail on Catalyst emissions
-
0.25% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.017% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.017% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
0.46% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.28% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.28% fail on Registration plates
-
0.20% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
0.050% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.033% fail on System (48 times worse than other 2018 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.050% fail on
Doors
-
0.050% fail on
Other passenger's door
(3 times worse than other 2018 cars)
- 0.050% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other 2018 cars)
-
0.050% fail on
Other passenger's door
(3 times worse than other 2018 cars)
- 0.033% fail on Bumpers
-
0.017% fail on
Transmission
-
0.017% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.017% fail on Joints
-
0.017% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.017% fail on
Body
- 0.017% fail on Panel
-
0.017% fail on
Seats
- 0.017% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.017% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.017% fail on Boot lid condition
-
0.050% fail on
Fuel system
-
0.17% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.100% fail on Attachment
- 0.066% fail on Condition
-
0.12% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(63% better than other 2018 cars)
- 0.066% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.050% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.033% fail on Condition (79% better than other 2018 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Requirements
-
0.100% fail on
Suspension
(72% better than other 2018 cars)
-
0.050% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.033% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.017% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.033% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.017% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.017% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.017% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.050% fail on
Suspension arms
-
0.033% fail on
Steering
-
0.017% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.017% fail on Steering rack
-
0.017% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.017% fail on Track rod end
-
0.017% fail on
Steering gear
Read the Honest John Review
-
Jaguar XF (2015 on)
Great blend of ride quality and enjoyable handling. Comfortable and refined. Well-equipped as standard. Fleet-friendly diesel engine.