Jaguar XF MOT Results

Registered in 2018
86.3% pass rate
from 6,024 tests in 2021
(16% worse than other 2018 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2018 cars and highlighted areas where the Jaguar XF is unusually good or bad.

  • 5.0% fail on Visibility (55% worse than other 2018 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Wipers (93% worse than other 2018 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Washers (53% better than other 2018 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.12% fail on Windscreen
  • 4.0% fail on Tyres (18% worse than other 2018 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Condition
    • 1.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.050% fail on Size/type
  • 2.2% fail on Brakes (57% worse than other 2018 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Mechanical brake components (94% worse than other 2018 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Brake linings and pads (96% worse than other 2018 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Brake pads (97% worse than other 2018 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.32% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.37% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.13% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.13% fail on Rbt
          • 0.13% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.12% fail on Brake performance not tested (3 times worse than other 2018 cars)
      • 0.066% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.033% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.017% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.017% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.033% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (12 times worse than other 2018 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.033% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.017% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
    • 0.066% fail on Flexible brake hoses (3 times worse than other 2018 cars)
    • 0.050% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.050% fail on Pedal
    • 0.050% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (4 times worse than other 2018 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (5 times worse than other 2018 cars)
    • 0.017% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.017% fail on Electronic parking brake
    • 0.017% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.017% fail on Electronic stability control
  • 1.7% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (36% better than other 2018 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.017% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.30% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.25% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (4 times worse than other 2018 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on Headlamp (85% better than other 2018 cars)
    • 0.083% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.083% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.066% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.017% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.050% fail on Stop lamp (74% better than other 2018 cars)
    • 0.033% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (81% better than other 2018 cars)
      • 0.033% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.033% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.033% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.033% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.017% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.017% fail on Horn
  • 0.46% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.46% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.25% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.20% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.033% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.017% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.22% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.18% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.033% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.017% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.017% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.28% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.28% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.20% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.050% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.033% fail on System (48 times worse than other 2018 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.050% fail on Doors
      • 0.050% fail on Other passenger's door (3 times worse than other 2018 cars)
        • 0.050% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other 2018 cars)
    • 0.033% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.017% fail on Transmission
      • 0.017% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.017% fail on Joints
    • 0.017% fail on Body
      • 0.017% fail on Panel
    • 0.017% fail on Seats
      • 0.017% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.017% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.017% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 0.17% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.100% fail on Attachment
    • 0.066% fail on Condition
  • 0.12% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (63% better than other 2018 cars)
    • 0.066% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.050% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.033% fail on Condition (79% better than other 2018 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Requirements
  • 0.100% fail on Suspension (72% better than other 2018 cars)
    • 0.050% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.033% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.017% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.033% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.017% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.017% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.017% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 0.033% fail on Steering
    • 0.017% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.017% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.017% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.017% fail on Track rod end
Read the Honest John Review

  • Jaguar XF (2015 on)
    Great blend of ride quality and enjoyable handling. Comfortable and refined. Well-equipped as standard. Fleet-friendly diesel engine.

    Search Good Garages