Jaguar XF MOT Results

Registered in 2017

86.9% pass rate

from 7,391 tests in 2021

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the Jaguar XF is unusually good or bad.

4.5% fail on Visibility (23% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Wipers (49% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Washers (56% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.095% fail on Condition of glass
  - 0.095% fail on Windscreen
- 0.027% fail on View to rear
  - 0.014% fail on Mirrors
  - 0.014% fail on Indirect vision devices
3.7% fail on Tyres
- 1.9% fail on Condition
- 1.9% fail on Tread depth
- 0.027% fail on Size/type
2.4% fail on Brakes
- 1.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 1.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 1.6% fail on Brake pads
  - 0.39% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 0.39% fail on Brake discs
- 0.45% fail on Brake performance
  - 0.24% fail on Service brake performance
    - 0.24% fail on Rbt
      - 0.22% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.027% fail on Service brake imbalance
  - 0.11% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
    - 0.11% fail on Rbt (sp)
  - 0.054% fail on Brake performance not tested
  - 0.041% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 0.041% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 0.027% fail on Service brake imbalance
      - 0.014% fail on Service brake performance
  - 0.041% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 0.027% fail on Rbt
      - 0.027% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 0.014% fail on Plate brake tester
      - 0.014% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.16% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (150% worse than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.11% fail on Anti-lock braking system (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.081% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.054% fail on Parking brake control
  - 0.054% fail on Electronic parking brake
- 0.041% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
  - 0.041% fail on Pedal
- 0.041% fail on Flexible brake hoses
- 0.014% fail on Rigid brake pipes
1.6% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (41% better than other 2017 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 0.99% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 0.014% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.35% fail on Headlamps
  - 0.27% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.081% fail on Headlamp (81% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Direction indicators
  - 0.11% fail on Flashing type
    - 0.054% fail on Side repeaters (70% better than other 2017 cars)
    - 0.041% fail on Individual direction indicators
    - 0.014% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.068% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 0.041% fail on Horn
  - 0.014% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  - 0.014% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.054% fail on Stop lamp (84% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.014% fail on Position lamps
  - 0.014% fail on All position lamps
- 0.014% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 0.014% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 0.014% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 0.014% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
0.76% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 0.73% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 0.54% fail on Compression ignition (150% worse than other 2017 cars)
    - 0.45% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (180% worse than other 2017 cars)
    - 0.054% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
    - 0.027% fail on Emissions not tested
    - 0.014% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
  - 0.19% fail on Spark ignition
    - 0.19% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.027% fail on Fluid leaks
  - 0.027% fail on Engine oil leaks
0.32% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 0.32% fail on Registration plates
0.19% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 0.054% fail on Doors
  - 0.041% fail on Other passenger's door
    - 0.041% fail on Door condition
  - 0.014% fail on Front passenger's door
    - 0.014% fail on Door condition
- 0.041% fail on Bumpers
- 0.027% fail on Undertray
- 0.014% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.014% fail on Fuel system
  - 0.014% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.014% fail on Transmission
  - 0.014% fail on Drive shafts
    - 0.014% fail on Joints
- 0.014% fail on Engine mounting
  - 0.014% fail on Engine mounting condition
- 0.014% fail on Body
  - 0.014% fail on Panel
0.12% fail on Suspension (86% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.068% fail on Suspension arms (71% better than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.054% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.014% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.027% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.027% fail on Shock absorbers
0.11% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.095% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.014% fail on Seat belts
  - 0.014% fail on Condition
0.11% fail on Road Wheels
- 0.095% fail on Attachment
- 0.014% fail on Condition

Read the Honest John Review

Jaguar XF (2015 on)
Great blend of ride quality and enjoyable handling. Comfortable and refined. Well-equipped as standard. Fleet-friendly diesel engine.