Jaguar XF MOT Results

Registered in 2016
86.4% pass rate
from 9,401 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Jaguar XF is unusually good or bad.

  • 4.4% fail on Tyres (25% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Condition (29% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Tread depth (26% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.085% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
    • 0.064% fail on Size/type
  • 2.9% fail on Visibility
    • 2.5% fail on Wipers (35% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Washers (71% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.064% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.064% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.064% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.021% fail on View to rear
      • 0.021% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.011% fail on Bonnet
  • 2.7% fail on Brakes (33% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Mechanical brake components (52% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Brake linings and pads (46% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Brake pads (45% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.021% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.52% fail on Brake discs and drums (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.52% fail on Brake discs (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.19% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.18% fail on Rbt
          • 0.14% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.043% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.011% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.011% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.13% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.11% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.011% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.011% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 0.074% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.011% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.011% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.011% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 0.096% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.096% fail on Pedal
    • 0.085% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.085% fail on Anti-lock braking system (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.043% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.043% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.032% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.032% fail on Electronic parking brake
  • 2.4% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (30% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.52% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.43% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.085% fail on Headlamp (79% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.13% fail on Direction indicators (59% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Flashing type (59% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.096% fail on Side repeaters (63% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.011% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.011% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.011% fail on Switch
    • 0.096% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (65% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.074% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.074% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.064% fail on Stop lamp (84% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.032% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (79% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.032% fail on Rear fog lamp (79% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.021% fail on Rear fog lamp (85% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.011% fail on Switch
    • 0.021% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.021% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.011% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.011% fail on Horn
  • 0.51% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (100% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.35% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.13% fail on Condition
      • 0.011% fail on Attachment
      • 0.011% fail on Pre-tensioners
    • 0.011% fail on Airbags
      • 0.011% fail on Drivers airbag
      • 0.011% fail on Passengers airbag
  • 0.45% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.40% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.30% fail on Compression ignition (69% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (110% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.064% fail on Emissions not tested (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.11% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.011% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.043% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.032% fail on Other leaks (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 0.41% fail on Identification of the vehicle (75% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Registration plates (76% worse than other 2016 cars)
  • 0.14% fail on Body, chassis, structure (51% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.032% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.021% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.021% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.021% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.021% fail on Doors
      • 0.021% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.021% fail on Door condition
    • 0.011% fail on Transmission
      • 0.011% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.011% fail on Joints
    • 0.011% fail on Body
      • 0.011% fail on Other body component
    • 0.011% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.011% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.011% fail on Undertray
  • 0.13% fail on Suspension (79% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.064% fail on Shock absorbers (64% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.021% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.021% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.011% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.011% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 0.011% fail on Springs
      • 0.011% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.011% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.011% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.011% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 0.12% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.074% fail on Attachment
    • 0.043% fail on Condition
  • 0.032% fail on Steering (75% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.021% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.021% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.011% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.011% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.011% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.011% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review

  • Jaguar XF (2015 on)
    Superb blend of ride quality and enjoyable handling. Comfortable and refined. Well-equipped as standard. Available with low CO2 diesel engines.

    Search Good Garages