MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Jaguar » XF » 2016

Jaguar XF MOT Results

Registered in 2016
85.2% pass rate
from 9,009 tests in 2021
(11% better than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Jaguar XF is unusually good or bad.

  • 4.1% fail on Tyres
    • 2.2% fail on Condition
    • 2.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.033% fail on Size/type
  • 3.8% fail on Visibility
    • 3.4% fail on Wipers (19% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Washers (69% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.056% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.022% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.011% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.011% fail on Windscreen
  • 3.3% fail on Brakes (19% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Mechanical brake components (26% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Brake linings and pads (27% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Brake pads (27% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.011% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.60% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.60% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.52% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Anti-lock braking system (11 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Electronic stability control (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.022% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.51% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.27% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.26% fail on Rbt
          • 0.19% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.067% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.011% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.011% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.12% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.11% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.011% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 0.089% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.056% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.056% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.033% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.022% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.011% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.011% fail on Rbt
          • 0.011% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 0.089% fail on Flexible brake hoses (170% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.078% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.078% fail on Pedal
    • 0.033% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.033% fail on Electronic parking brake
    • 0.011% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.011% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.011% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.011% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 1.8% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (50% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.40% fail on Headlamps (45% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Headlamp (76% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.14% fail on Direction indicators (60% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Flashing type (60% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.078% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.067% fail on Side repeaters (76% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.056% fail on Stop lamp (91% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.044% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (87% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.044% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.044% fail on Horn
  • 0.80% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.79% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.58% fail on Compression ignition (69% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.44% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (77% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.078% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.044% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.022% fail on Emission control equipment (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.022% fail on Particulate filter (26 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.011% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
      • 0.21% fail on Spark ignition (55% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.011% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.011% fail on Oxygen sensor
        • 0.011% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.011% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.011% fail on Other leaks
  • 0.58% fail on Identification of the vehicle (170% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.58% fail on Registration plates (170% worse than other 2016 cars)
  • 0.52% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (82% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.100% fail on Condition
      • 0.011% fail on Requirements
    • 0.033% fail on Airbags (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.033% fail on Drivers airbag (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  • 0.37% fail on Suspension (82% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Suspension arms (73% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.100% fail on Pins and bushes (59% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.022% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.011% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.100% fail on Springs (91% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.100% fail on Coil springs (91% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.100% fail on Coil spring (91% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.089% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.022% fail on Anti-roll bars (89% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.011% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 0.011% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.011% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.011% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 0.34% fail on Body, chassis, structure (37% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Doors (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Other passenger's door (9 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Door condition (9 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.011% fail on Door condition
    • 0.044% fail on Exhaust system (72% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.033% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.022% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.011% fail on Hose
      • 0.011% fail on System
    • 0.022% fail on Seats
      • 0.022% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.011% fail on Undertray
  • 0.29% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.22% fail on Attachment
    • 0.067% fail on Condition
  • 0.056% fail on Steering (79% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.022% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.022% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.022% fail on Steering linkage components (90% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.011% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.011% fail on Steering wheel
Read the Honest John Review

  • Jaguar XF (2015 on)
    Great blend of ride quality and enjoyable handling. Comfortable and refined. Well-equipped as standard. Fleet-friendly diesel engine.

    Search Good Garages