Jaguar XF MOT Results

Registered in 2010
75.9% pass rate
from 9,817 tests in 2017
(17% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Jaguar XF is unusually good or bad.

  • 13% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 6.5% fail on Registration plate lamp (80% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamps (65% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Headlamp (57% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.071% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.071% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Switch (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.010% fail on Dipswitch
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim (36% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Position lamps (31% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Front lamps (19% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.061% fail on Rear lamps (90% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.010% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.13% fail on Direction indicators (91% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Flashing type (91% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.081% fail on Individual lamps (90% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.031% fail on All direction indicators (79% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.020% fail on Side repeaters (96% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Horn
    • 0.071% fail on Stop lamp (97% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.031% fail on Battery (74% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.010% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.010% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 8.6% fail on Tyres (27% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Condition (59% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.28% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.071% fail on Valve stem
    • 0.051% fail on Size/type
  • 3.2% fail on Driver's view of the road (33% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Wipers
    • 0.72% fail on Washers (60% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Windscreen (56% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.051% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.041% fail on Mirrors
  • 2.7% fail on Suspension (67% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.051% fail on Attachment
      • 0.010% fail on Condition
    • 0.67% fail on Anti-roll bars (58% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (60% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.061% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (74% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.61% fail on Shock absorbers (42% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Condition (42% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Coil springs (94% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Condition (94% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Tie bars/rods (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.010% fail on Condition
      • 0.010% fail on Attachment
    • 0.11% fail on Front suspension joints (68% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Wheel bearings (68% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.092% fail on Front
      • 0.010% fail on Rear
    • 0.031% fail on Torque/reaction arms (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.010% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.010% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 0.010% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.010% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.010% fail on Drive shafts
  • 2.4% fail on Brakes (58% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Hub components (49% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Brake pads (51% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Brake discs (45% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Brake back plates (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Brake calipers
    • 0.63% fail on Brake performance (71% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Front wheels (57% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Rear wheels (76% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Parking brake performance (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.071% fail on Brake imbalance (66% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.020% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.30% fail on Hydraulic systems (46% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Components (49% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Hoses
        • 0.041% fail on Pipes (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on Leaks
    • 0.10% fail on Parking brake (71% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Electronic parking brake (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.061% fail on ABS (69% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.041% fail on Additional braking devices (26 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.010% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.010% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.010% fail on Components
        • 0.010% fail on Servos
    • 0.010% fail on Restricted movement
  • 0.51% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.51% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.42% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.25% fail on Attachment
    • 0.16% fail on Condition
  • 0.34% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (76% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Exhaust system (79% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.081% fail on Cap
      • 0.010% fail on Tank
      • 0.010% fail on System
    • 0.031% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.020% fail on Emissions (93% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.26% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.19% fail on Doors
      • 0.17% fail on Passengers other (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.010% fail on Drivers
      • 0.010% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.041% fail on Body condition
    • 0.020% fail on Seats
      • 0.010% fail on Passengers
      • 0.010% fail on Drivers
    • 0.010% fail on Body security
  • 0.24% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (55% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.14% fail on Condition
      • 0.041% fail on Requirements
    • 0.071% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (74% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.071% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (72% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.17% fail on Steering (83% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.092% fail on Steering system (90% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Steering rack (76% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Track rod end (96% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.010% fail on Free play
        • 0.010% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.010% fail on Intermediate drop arm
      • 0.010% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.010% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.051% fail on Power steering
      • 0.051% fail on Operation
      • 0.031% fail on Other components
    • 0.020% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.010% fail on Locking devices
Read the Honest John Review

  • Jaguar XF (2008 - 2015)
    Wonderful and bespoke feeling interior. Amazingly quiet and refined. More economical 2.2 diesel from 2011. Navigation not fitted as standard on most models.

    Search Good Garages