Jaguar XF MOT Results

Registered in 2010
73.4% pass rate
from 11,343 tests in 2020
(25% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Jaguar XF is unusually good or bad.

  • 11% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (14% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamps (30% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp (29% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.071% fail on Dipswitch (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.026% fail on Headlamp levelling device (73% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (69% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim (18% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim (22% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.7% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Position lamps (31% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Position lamp (30% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.026% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.26% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.18% fail on Horn
      • 0.062% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.026% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.15% fail on Stop lamp (95% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Direction indicators (94% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Flashing type (94% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.053% fail on Individual direction indicators (95% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.053% fail on Side repeaters (92% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0088% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.0088% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.0088% fail on Switch
  • 8.0% fail on Tyres (26% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Condition (68% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.053% fail on Size/type (68% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 4.6% fail on Suspension (57% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Suspension arms (21% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Pins and bushes (41% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Ball joint (70% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.0088% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.0088% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.2% fail on Anti-roll bars (59% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Linkage ball joints (62% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (66% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint dust cover (50% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Linkage
      • 0.071% fail on Ball joint (73% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.018% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (81% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0088% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.0088% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.77% fail on Springs (80% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.77% fail on Coil springs (80% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.77% fail on Coil spring (80% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Suspension rods (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint dust cover (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.026% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.22% fail on Wheel bearings (51% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.062% fail on Other suspension component (70% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.018% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.0088% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.0088% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0088% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.053% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.026% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.018% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.0088% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.035% fail on Shock absorbers (97% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.0088% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.0088% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 3.5% fail on Brakes (51% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Mechanical brake components (30% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Brake linings and pads (24% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Brake pads (24% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0088% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.63% fail on Brake discs and drums (38% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.62% fail on Brake discs (39% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0088% fail on Brake drums
    • 1.1% fail on Brake performance (65% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Service brake performance (47% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.86% fail on Rbt (47% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.75% fail on Service brake performance (46% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.16% fail on Service brake imbalance (56% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.026% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.026% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.19% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (85% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Rbt (sp) (86% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0088% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.0088% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 0.079% fail on Parking brake performance (87% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.079% fail on Rbt (86% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.071% fail on Parking brake performance (86% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.0088% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.053% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (88% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.053% fail on Rbt (sp) (88% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.053% fail on Service brake imbalance (84% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.0088% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.044% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.13% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (66% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Anti-lock braking system (59% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Electronic stability control (71% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0088% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.11% fail on Parking brake control (63% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Electronic parking brake (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.071% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.071% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.062% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.0088% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.035% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.026% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.0088% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.035% fail on Rigid brake pipes (93% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.018% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.0088% fail on Other components
      • 0.0088% fail on Additional braking device
    • 0.0088% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.0088% fail on Pedal
    • 0.0088% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.0088% fail on Operation
  • 3.3% fail on Visibility (33% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Wipers
    • 1.1% fail on Washers (54% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.071% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.071% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.071% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.053% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.026% fail on View to rear (81% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.026% fail on Mirrors (81% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 1.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (64% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.00% fail on Exhaust emissions (63% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Compression ignition (40% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (54% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.071% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.018% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.018% fail on Particulate filter
        • 0.018% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.0088% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 0.27% fail on Spark ignition (82% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (66% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0088% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.035% fail on Fluid leaks (81% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.0088% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.0088% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
    • 0.0088% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.0088% fail on Undertray
  • 0.64% fail on Body, chassis, structure (80% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Doors
      • 0.22% fail on Other passenger's door (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.026% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.026% fail on Door condition
    • 0.15% fail on Exhaust system (89% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.053% fail on Seats
      • 0.035% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.018% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.053% fail on Undertray
    • 0.044% fail on Fuel system (78% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (65% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.026% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.026% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.026% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.0088% fail on Chassis
      • 0.0088% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.0088% fail on Towbar
      • 0.0088% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.0088% fail on Transmission
      • 0.0088% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.0088% fail on Joints
    • 0.0088% fail on Body
      • 0.0088% fail on Other body component
    • 0.0088% fail on Load security
      • 0.0088% fail on Access panel
  • 0.56% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.39% fail on Attachment
    • 0.17% fail on Condition
  • 0.47% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.47% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.23% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (69% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Seat belts (60% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Condition (58% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0088% fail on Requirements
    • 0.088% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (77% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.19% fail on Steering (89% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Steering linkage components (91% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Track rod end (96% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.026% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.018% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0088% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.0088% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.0088% fail on Rear wheel steering
        • 0.0088% fail on Components
    • 0.044% fail on Power steering
      • 0.018% fail on Operation
      • 0.018% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.0088% fail on Other components
    • 0.018% fail on Steering gear (90% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Steering rack (89% better than other 2010 cars)
Read the Honest John Review

  • Jaguar XF (2008 - 2015)
    Wonderful and bespoke feeling interior. Amazingly quiet and refined. More economical 2.2 diesel from 2011. Navigation not fitted as standard on most models.

    Search Good Garages