Jaguar XF MOT Results
Registered in 200973.7% pass rate
from 7,892 tests in 2017
(20% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Jaguar XF is unusually good or bad.
-
13% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(13% better than other 2009 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Registration plate lamp (39% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Headlamps
(29% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Headlamp (26% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.013% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.013% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
- 0.013% fail on Switch
-
3.3% fail on
Position lamps
- 3.1% fail on Front lamps
- 0.13% fail on Rear lamps (85% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.025% fail on All position lamps
- 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim (43% better than other 2009 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(190% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Fog lamp (200% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Switch
-
0.27% fail on
Direction indicators
(83% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Flashing type
(83% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Side repeaters (69% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.089% fail on Individual lamps (90% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Switch
-
0.27% fail on
Flashing type
(83% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Stop lamp (93% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Horn
- 0.10% fail on Battery
- 0.076% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.063% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.013% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
9.4% fail on
Tyres
(31% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Condition (66% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Tread depth
- 0.32% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Valve stem (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Size/type
-
4.1% fail on
Suspension
(62% better than other 2009 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.025% fail on Attachment
-
0.86% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(66% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.57% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (72% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.13% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (68% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Condition
- 0.013% fail on Attachment
-
0.71% fail on
Shock absorbers
(39% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.71% fail on Condition (39% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.60% fail on
Coil springs
(85% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Condition (85% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Tie bars/rods
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Condition
- 0.22% fail on Front suspension joints (57% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Wheel bearings
(62% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Front
- 0.063% fail on Rear (72% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.025% fail on
Trailing arms
(88% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (87% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.025% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.025% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.013% fail on
Torque/reaction arms
- 0.013% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.013% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.013% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 0.013% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
0.013% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
1.8% fail on
Suspension arms
-
3.8% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(27% better than other 2009 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Wipers (18% better than other 2009 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Washers (33% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Windscreen
- 0.038% fail on Mirrors (76% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Indirect vision devices (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Brakes
(51% better than other 2009 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Hub components
(31% better than other 2009 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Brake pads (27% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Brake discs (46% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Brake calipers
-
1.0% fail on
Brake performance
(64% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.51% fail on Rear wheels (66% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Parking brake performance (67% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Front wheels (70% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Brake imbalance (63% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.051% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.013% fail on Brake operation
- 0.013% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.33% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(58% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Components
(59% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Hoses
- 0.063% fail on Pipes (87% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Servos
- 0.038% fail on Leaks
- 0.013% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.013% fail on Operation
-
0.27% fail on
Components
(59% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Parking brake
(60% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Electronic parking brake (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.051% fail on Electronic stability system
- 0.051% fail on ABS (81% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Restricted movement (74% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.013% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.013% fail on Cable
- 0.013% fail on Locking devices
-
1.9% fail on
Hub components
(31% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.56% fail on
Road Wheels
(63% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Condition (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Attachment
-
0.42% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.42% fail on Registration plate
-
0.39% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(36% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.19% fail on Condition
- 0.038% fail on Requirements
-
0.16% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(52% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.15% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (52% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.23% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.35% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(82% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Exhaust system (86% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.10% fail on Cap
- 0.013% fail on System
- 0.051% fail on Emissions (91% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.28% fail on
Steering
(77% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Steering system
(85% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.089% fail on Steering rack
- 0.038% fail on Ball joint
-
0.013% fail on
Free play
- 0.013% fail on Steering rack
- 0.013% fail on Track rod end
- 0.013% fail on Steering arm
-
0.089% fail on
Power steering
- 0.038% fail on Operation
- 0.025% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.025% fail on Other components
- 0.013% fail on Steering operation
- 0.013% fail on Locking devices
-
0.16% fail on
Steering system
(85% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(43% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Doors
- 0.15% fail on Passengers other (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Drivers
- 0.013% fail on Passengers front
- 0.051% fail on Body condition
-
0.025% fail on
Seats
- 0.013% fail on Passengers
- 0.013% fail on Drivers
-
0.18% fail on
Doors
Read the Honest John Review
-
Jaguar XF (2008 - 2015)
Wonderful and bespoke feeling interior. Amazingly quiet and refined. More economical 2.2 diesel from 2011. Navigation not fitted as standard on most models.