Jaguar XE MOT Results
Registered in 201783.7% pass rate
from 11,103 tests in 2021
(19% worse than other 2017 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the Jaguar XE is unusually good or bad.
-
4.9% fail on
Visibility
(34% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Wipers (62% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Washers (45% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.045% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.045% fail on Windscreen
-
0.036% fail on
View to rear
- 0.027% fail on Mirrors
- 0.0090% fail on Indirect vision devices
- 0.018% fail on Bonnet
-
4.4% fail on
Tyres
(30% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Condition (58% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Tread depth
- 0.14% fail on Size/type (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(28% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Stop lamp (4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.93% fail on
Headlamp aim
(29% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.92% fail on Headlamp aim (27% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0090% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.70% fail on
Headlamps
(39% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Headlamp
- 0.35% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.081% fail on
Direction indicators
(67% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.081% fail on
Flashing type
(67% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.054% fail on Side repeaters (70% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.027% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.081% fail on
Flashing type
(67% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.036% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(75% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.036% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(75% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.036% fail on Rear fog lamp (75% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.036% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(75% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (91% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.018% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.0090% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.0090% fail on Horn
-
0.0090% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.0090% fail on Main beam tell-tale
-
2.7% fail on
Brakes
(31% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(48% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(50% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Brake pads (51% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.64% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(87% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.64% fail on Brake discs (87% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(50% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.33% fail on
Brake performance
-
0.18% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.18% fail on
Rbt
- 0.14% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.045% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.18% fail on
Rbt
-
0.099% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.090% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.0090% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.063% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.045% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.027% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.018% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.018% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.045% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.036% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.027% fail on
Rbt
- 0.027% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.0090% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.0090% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.027% fail on
Rbt
-
0.18% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.15% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(130% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Anti-lock braking system (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.045% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.036% fail on Electronic braking system (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.090% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.090% fail on Pedal (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.054% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.054% fail on Electronic parking brake (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.045% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.027% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.027% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
2.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(48% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.48% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
0.44% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.30% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.23% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.027% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
- 0.027% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.0090% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
-
0.14% fail on
Spark ignition
(54% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.099% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.045% fail on Catalyst emissions
-
0.30% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.027% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.018% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.0090% fail on Other leaks
-
0.0090% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.0090% fail on Undertray
-
0.44% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.32% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(58% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Registration plates (58% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Road Wheels
(80% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Attachment (110% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.072% fail on Condition
-
0.25% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.18% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.17% fail on Condition
- 0.0090% fail on Requirements
- 0.072% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.18% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.24% fail on
Suspension
(72% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.054% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.045% fail on
Suspension arms
(80% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Pins and bushes (85% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.0090% fail on Suspension arm
-
0.027% fail on
Springs
(92% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.027% fail on
Coil springs
(92% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.027% fail on Coil spring (92% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.027% fail on
Coil springs
(92% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(48% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.063% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.027% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.018% fail on Pipe
- 0.018% fail on System (10 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.036% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.018% fail on
Transmission
(82% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.018% fail on
Drive shafts
(81% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Joints (81% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.018% fail on
Drive shafts
(81% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.018% fail on
Seats
- 0.0090% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.0090% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.0090% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.0090% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
0.0090% fail on
Body
- 0.0090% fail on Body condition
-
0.0090% fail on
Doors
-
0.0090% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.0090% fail on Door condition
-
0.0090% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.063% fail on
Fuel system
-
0.054% fail on
Steering
(64% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.036% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.018% fail on Track rod end (80% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0090% fail on Ball joint
-
0.0090% fail on
Other components
- 0.0090% fail on Steering linkage
-
0.027% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.027% fail on Steering rack
-
0.036% fail on
Steering linkage components
Read the Honest John Review
-
Jaguar XE (2015 on)
Superb ride comfort and fuel economy. Eight-speed automatic is excellent. Interior is much improved from 2019.