Jaguar X-Type MOT Results

Registered in 2009
74.2% pass rate
from 4,840 tests in 2017
(25% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Jaguar X-Type is unusually good or bad.

  • 8.5% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (45% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim (36% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Position lamps (47% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Front lamps (44% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Rear lamps (55% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Headlamps (35% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp (40% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.083% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
        • 0.021% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.062% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.062% fail on Headlamp levelling device
        • 0.041% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.021% fail on Switch
    • 1.5% fail on Stop lamp (54% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Direction indicators (34% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Flashing type (34% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.56% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.43% fail on Individual lamps (50% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.021% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.68% fail on Registration plate lamp (83% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.27% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.14% fail on Battery
    • 0.12% fail on Horn
    • 0.021% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.021% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.021% fail on Lamp
    • 0.021% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 7.5% fail on Tyres
    • 5.0% fail on Condition (44% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth (31% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Valve stem (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Size/type
  • 7.0% fail on Suspension (35% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Coil springs (18% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Condition (18% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Location
    • 1.2% fail on Anti-roll bars (52% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.95% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (53% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (69% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.062% fail on Condition
      • 0.062% fail on Attachment
    • 0.62% fail on Trailing arms (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Condition
      • 0.021% fail on Attachment
    • 0.60% fail on Suspension arms (68% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (68% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Attachment
    • 0.60% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.45% fail on Rear (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Front
    • 0.52% fail on Drive shafts (53% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Front drive shafts (52% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.52% fail on Constant velocity joints (52% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Shock absorbers (62% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Condition (62% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Radius arms (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.041% fail on Condition (74 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Attachment
    • 0.083% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.062% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.021% fail on Condition
    • 0.083% fail on Front suspension joints (84% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.083% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.083% fail on Component mounting (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.062% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.021% fail on Condition
      • 0.021% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.021% fail on Attachment
    • 0.021% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.021% fail on Condition
    • 0.021% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.021% fail on Condition
  • 5.7% fail on Brakes
    • 2.7% fail on Hub components
      • 1.9% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.79% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.50% fail on Brake calipers (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance (50% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.52% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.17% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.041% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.021% fail on Service brake performance
    • 0.74% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.37% fail on Leaks (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Components (59% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Hoses
        • 0.062% fail on Pipes (88% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Operation (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 0.33% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.33% fail on Condition
    • 0.12% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.10% fail on ABS
    • 0.083% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.083% fail on Pedal
        • 0.041% fail on Condition
        • 0.041% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.041% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.021% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.021% fail on Cable
  • 3.4% fail on Driver's view of the road (36% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Wipers
    • 1.1% fail on Washers (49% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.041% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.021% fail on Bonnet
  • 0.54% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.54% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.52% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (74% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.12% fail on System
      • 0.062% fail on Cap
      • 0.041% fail on Tank
    • 0.10% fail on Exhaust system (92% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Emissions (82% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.083% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.37% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.23% fail on Attachment
    • 0.14% fail on Condition
  • 0.33% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.12% fail on Doors
      • 0.12% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.12% fail on Seats
      • 0.10% fail on Drivers
      • 0.041% fail on Passengers
    • 0.083% fail on Body condition
    • 0.021% fail on Body security
  • 0.21% fail on Steering (83% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Steering system (88% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.021% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.021% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.021% fail on Other components
        • 0.021% fail on Steering component
    • 0.041% fail on Power steering
      • 0.021% fail on Operation
      • 0.021% fail on Other components
    • 0.021% fail on Steering control
      • 0.021% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.021% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.021% fail on Steering operation
  • 0.17% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (73% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.083% fail on Condition
      • 0.021% fail on Attachment
    • 0.062% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (82% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.041% fail on Passengers airbag (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages