Jaguar X-Type MOT Results

Registered in 2005
54.4% pass rate
from 11,193 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Jaguar X-Type is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Suspension (22% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 8.0% fail on Anti-roll bars (47% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (21% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Linkage condition (66% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Attachment (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Condition (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Presence
    • 6.4% fail on Prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 6.0% fail on Component mounting (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Subframe mounting (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.089% fail on Spring mounting
    • 4.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.28% fail on Condition (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.045% fail on Attachment
    • 3.5% fail on Coil springs (31% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Condition (31% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.098% fail on Location
    • 2.8% fail on Wheel bearings (88% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Rear (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Front (71% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Drive shafts (49% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Front drive shafts (49% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Constant velocity joints (50% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.036% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.018% fail on Couplings
      • 0.018% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.018% fail on Drive shafts
    • 1.7% fail on Trailing arms (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
    • 1.2% fail on Tie bars/rods (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.027% fail on Condition
      • 0.018% fail on Attachment
    • 0.65% fail on Front suspension joints (48% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.45% fail on Radius arms (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.036% fail on Condition (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Attachment (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Sub-frames (67% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Condition (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.080% fail on Attachment (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.0089% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.20% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.20% fail on Condition
    • 0.12% fail on Torque/reaction arms (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.0089% fail on Attachment
    • 0.027% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.027% fail on Condition
    • 0.018% fail on Panhard rods
      • 0.018% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.0089% fail on General condition
  • 18% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (22% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.9% fail on Position lamps (21% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Front lamps (19% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Rear lamps (23% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.8% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.089% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.080% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
        • 0.0089% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.054% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.027% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
        • 0.018% fail on Headlamp levelling device
        • 0.0089% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.018% fail on Switch
      • 0.0089% fail on Matched pair
    • 3.4% fail on Registration plate lamp (46% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Direction indicators (16% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Flashing type (16% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.34% fail on Side repeaters (53% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.1% fail on Stop lamp (55% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Battery (37% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Rear fog lamp (73% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Fog lamp (72% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.0089% fail on Switch
    • 0.17% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.11% fail on Horn (77% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.054% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.018% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.018% fail on Hazard warning (81% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.0089% fail on Lamp
      • 0.0089% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.0089% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 15% fail on Brakes (10% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Hydraulic systems (63% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.5% fail on Components (57% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 4.7% fail on Pipes (70% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.88% fail on Hoses
        • 0.15% fail on Reservoirs (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.045% fail on Cylinders
      • 0.88% fail on Leaks (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Operation
      • 0.071% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 6.1% fail on Brake performance (11% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.8% fail on Rear wheels (15% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.44% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.33% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.21% fail on Brake performance not tested (81% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.027% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.0089% fail on Gradient hand brake
    • 4.3% fail on Hub components (23% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.5% fail on Brake discs (58% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Brake calipers (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.0089% fail on Brake back plates
    • 0.80% fail on ABS
    • 0.61% fail on Parking brake (30% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Condition
    • 0.21% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.13% fail on Cable
      • 0.071% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.0089% fail on Linkage
    • 0.15% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.13% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.13% fail on Pedal
        • 0.11% fail on Condition
        • 0.027% fail on Anti-slip (76% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.063% fail on Electronic stability system (73% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.0089% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.0089% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
  • 11% fail on Tyres (30% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 7.2% fail on Condition (87% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.30% fail on Size/type
    • 0.15% fail on Valve stem
  • 6.6% fail on Driver's view of the road (16% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Wipers (15% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Washers (28% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.52% fail on Bonnet (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.19% fail on Mirrors
  • 5.3% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 2.8% fail on Emissions (37% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Exhaust system (40% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.58% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.25% fail on System
      • 0.18% fail on Pipe (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.098% fail on Cap
      • 0.054% fail on Tank
      • 0.0089% fail on Hose
    • 0.39% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 4.5% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (85% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Condition (70% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Requirements
      • 0.0089% fail on Attachment
    • 0.38% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (73% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (75% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.045% fail on Passengers airbag (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.0089% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 2.9% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Body condition (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.82% fail on Vehicle structure (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Chassis (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.53% fail on Doors
      • 0.29% fail on Drivers (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.098% fail on Passengers other (57% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Seats
      • 0.11% fail on Drivers
      • 0.0089% fail on Passengers
    • 0.027% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.027% fail on Body security
    • 0.027% fail on Load security
      • 0.018% fail on Access panel
      • 0.0089% fail on Bootlid
    • 0.0089% fail on Speedometer
  • 1.5% fail on Steering (63% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Steering system (72% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Track rod end (78% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Steering rack (43% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint (61% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.036% fail on Free play (74% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.036% fail on Steering rack (74% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.027% fail on Steering arm (81% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Power steering
      • 0.11% fail on Other components
      • 0.080% fail on Operation
      • 0.071% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.045% fail on Pump (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.0089% fail on Rams
    • 0.098% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.080% fail on Steering control
      • 0.045% fail on Steering wheel (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.036% fail on Steering column
      • 0.0089% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.0089% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.018% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.93% fail on Road Wheels (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.74% fail on Attachment (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Condition
  • 0.68% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.68% fail on Registration plate
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages