Jaguar X-Type MOT Results
Registered in 200354.8% pass rate
from 4,114 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Jaguar X-Type is unusually good or bad.
-
20% fail on
Suspension
(19% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
8.7% fail on
Suspension arms
(50% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Pins and bushes (81% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Suspension arm (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Ball joint dust cover (54% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Ball joint (67% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.097% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 6.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (160% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Springs
-
3.5% fail on
Coil springs
- 3.4% fail on Coil spring
- 0.073% fail on Mounting
- 0.32% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
Coil springs
-
3.7% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(24% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.95% fail on Pins and bushes (150% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.85% fail on Linkage ball joints (40% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.85% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (35% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.51% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.29% fail on Ball joint
- 0.17% fail on Linkage
- 0.15% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (71% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.073% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.073% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.024% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 2.4% fail on Wheel bearings (63% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.58% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.34% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.19% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.024% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.024% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.29% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.19% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.049% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.024% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.024% fail on Ball joint
-
0.24% fail on
Suspension rods
(150% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.024% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.15% fail on Shock absorbers (82% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.073% fail on
Axles
- 0.073% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
-
0.073% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.049% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.024% fail on Macpherson strut
-
8.7% fail on
Suspension arms
(50% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
15% fail on
Brakes
-
9.2% fail on
Brake performance
(19% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
6.5% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(65% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 5.9% fail on Rbt (sp) (61% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Parking brake performance
(170% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
4.0% fail on
Rbt
(170% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Parking brake performance (180% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.12% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.073% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.049% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.024% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.024% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.024% fail on Parking brake performance
-
4.0% fail on
Rbt
(170% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Service brake performance
(24% better than other 2003 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Rbt
- 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.39% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.024% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.024% fail on Service brake performance
-
2.2% fail on
Rbt
-
0.66% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(61% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.58% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(65% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Service brake imbalance (66% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Service brake performance (68% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.073% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.58% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(65% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
6.5% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(65% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes (25% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.6% fail on Brake pads
-
1.3% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.3% fail on Brake discs
-
0.39% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.22% fail on Lever (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Cable
- 0.049% fail on Pivot (8 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.024% fail on Linkage
-
1.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
1.6% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 1.6% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.024% fail on Electronic braking system
- 0.024% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.53% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.53% fail on Lever
-
0.36% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.22% fail on Hand lever
- 0.15% fail on Pedal
-
0.24% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.22% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.024% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.24% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.049% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.049% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
9.2% fail on
Brake performance
(19% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
13% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(23% better than other 2003 cars)
-
6.0% fail on
Headlamps
- 5.3% fail on Headlamp
- 0.80% fail on Headlamp levelling device (58% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.049% fail on Dipswitch
-
5.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
(36% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Headlamp aim (32% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (83% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Stop lamp (72% better than other 2003 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Direction indicators
(45% better than other 2003 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Flashing type
(45% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.90% fail on Individual direction indicators (41% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Side repeaters (64% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.12% fail on All direction indicators
-
1.3% fail on
Flashing type
(45% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (58% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Electrical equipment
(65% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.12% fail on Horn (66% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.17% fail on Position lamp
-
0.17% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(88% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(88% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Rear fog lamp (88% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(88% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.024% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.024% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
6.0% fail on
Headlamps
-
12% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(64% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
12% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(65% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
11% fail on
Spark ignition
(69% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 8.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (180% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.56% fail on Emissions not tested (48% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.073% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.024% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.024% fail on Oxygen sensor
-
1.3% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.68% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.44% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (170% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.073% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.073% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.024% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.024% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve
- 0.024% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.024% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
-
11% fail on
Spark ignition
(69% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.95% fail on
Fluid leaks
(82% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.88% fail on Engine oil leaks (110% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.049% fail on Other leaks
- 0.024% fail on Transmission oil leaks
- 0.024% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
-
12% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(65% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
7.9% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(14% better than other 2003 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.024% fail on
Sub-frame
- 0.024% fail on Sub-frame condition
-
1.8% fail on
Chassis
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Chassis condition (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Doors
(120% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.61% fail on
Front passenger's door
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.61% fail on Door condition (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.53% fail on
Driver's door
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.27% fail on Door condition
-
0.61% fail on
Front passenger's door
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.97% fail on
Transmission
(71% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.92% fail on
Drive shafts
(71% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.92% fail on Joints (70% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.049% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.049% fail on Prop shaft
-
0.92% fail on
Drive shafts
(71% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.66% fail on Exhaust system (81% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.24% fail on
Seats
- 0.15% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.097% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.17% fail on
Boot lid
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Boot lid condition (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.024% fail on Other boot lid component
-
0.15% fail on
Body
- 0.073% fail on Other body component
- 0.049% fail on Panel
- 0.024% fail on Body condition
-
0.073% fail on
Fuel system
(86% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.073% fail on Pipe
-
0.073% fail on
Cabs
- 0.049% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.024% fail on Cab condition
- 0.024% fail on Bumpers
-
0.024% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.024% fail on Engine mounting condition
- 0.024% fail on Floor
-
3.0% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
7.3% fail on
Visibility
- 4.1% fail on Wipers
- 2.5% fail on Washers (31% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Bonnet (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.19% fail on Windscreen
-
0.049% fail on
View to rear
(82% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.049% fail on Mirrors (81% better than other 2003 cars)
-
6.3% fail on
Tyres
- 3.9% fail on Condition (49% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Tread depth (23% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Size/type
-
5.4% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(75% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Seat belts
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 5.2% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Condition (79% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.024% fail on Requirements
- 0.17% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (88% better than other 2003 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Seat belts
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Steering
(65% better than other 2003 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Steering linkage components
(65% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Track rod end (62% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.024% fail on Drag link end
-
0.22% fail on
Power steering
- 0.12% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.097% fail on Operation
- 0.024% fail on Pump
- 0.024% fail on Other components
-
0.19% fail on
Steering gear
(76% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Steering rack (75% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.049% fail on
Steering play
- 0.049% fail on Steering rack
-
1.1% fail on
Steering linkage components
(65% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.49% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.44% fail on Attachment
- 0.049% fail on Condition
-
0.44% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(49% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Registration plates (49% better than other 2003 cars)
Read the Honest John Review
-
Jaguar X-Type (2001 - 2009)
Compact Jaguar, launched as V6 only with four wheel drive. Held price well at first.