MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Jaguar » X-Type » 2002

Jaguar X-Type MOT Results

Registered in 2002
53.0% pass rate
from 2,842 tests in 2021
(7.1% worse than other 2002 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Jaguar X-Type is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Suspension (21% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 8.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 7.7% fail on Suspension arms (40% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Pins and bushes (33% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Suspension arm (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.74% fail on Ball joint (68% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 4.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.6% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.99% fail on Pins and bushes (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Linkage ball joints (46% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.39% fail on Linkage
      • 0.25% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.070% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (87% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.3% fail on Springs
      • 3.2% fail on Coil springs
        • 3.0% fail on Coil spring
        • 0.21% fail on Mounting (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Sub-frames (170% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.77% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (200% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Sub-frame (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.035% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.3% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.39% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.14% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.11% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.14% fail on Shock absorbers (82% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.070% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.035% fail on Suspension rod
      • 0.035% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.070% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.070% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 19% fail on Brakes (33% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 12% fail on Brake performance (55% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 9.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 8.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 4.6% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 4.3% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.28% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.070% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.21% fail on Plate brake tester (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.18% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.035% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.2% fail on Service brake performance (30% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt (29% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.42% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.56% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (72% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.56% fail on Rbt (sp) (71% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.39% fail on Service brake imbalance (73% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.25% fail on Service brake performance (67% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes (51% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.7% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.4% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.4% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.32% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.18% fail on Cable
        • 0.14% fail on Lever
        • 0.035% fail on Linkage
    • 2.2% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (46% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Anti-lock braking system (68% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Parking brake control (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Lever (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.74% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.74% fail on Hand lever (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.28% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.21% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.035% fail on Master cylinder
      • 0.035% fail on Valves
    • 0.18% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.18% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.070% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.070% fail on Servos
    • 0.035% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.035% fail on Other components
  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (24% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Headlamp aim (57% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 5.7% fail on Headlamp aim (58% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp (22% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.035% fail on Dipswitch
    • 2.5% fail on Stop lamp (49% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (32% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Direction indicators (80% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Flashing type (80% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Individual direction indicators (84% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Side repeaters (70% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Electrical equipment (82% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Horn
      • 0.035% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.11% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (92% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Rear fog lamp (92% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Rear fog lamp (92% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.070% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.070% fail on Position lamp
  • 12% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (64% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 11% fail on Exhaust emissions (67% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 11% fail on Spark ignition (83% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 8.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 4.3% fail on Catalyst emissions (33% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.46% fail on Emissions not tested (58% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.070% fail on Other emission control equipment (10 times worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.035% fail on NOx sensor
        • 0.035% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.39% fail on Compression ignition (55% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.070% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (83% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.035% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
    • 0.81% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.74% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.035% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.035% fail on Other leaks
  • 8.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.11% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 1.9% fail on Chassis (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Chassis condition (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Transmission (69% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.99% fail on Drive shafts (71% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.99% fail on Joints (71% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.070% fail on Joints
        • 0.035% fail on Prop shaft
        • 0.035% fail on Flexible couplings
    • 1.1% fail on Doors
      • 0.46% fail on Driver's door (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.46% fail on Door condition (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Front passenger's door (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.46% fail on Door condition (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.21% fail on Door condition
        • 0.035% fail on Catch
    • 0.39% fail on Exhaust system (89% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Cabs (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Floor (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Fuel system (75% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.070% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.035% fail on Tank
      • 0.035% fail on Pipe
    • 0.11% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.11% fail on Body
      • 0.035% fail on Body condition
      • 0.035% fail on Panel
      • 0.035% fail on Other body component
    • 0.070% fail on Seats
      • 0.070% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.070% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.070% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.070% fail on Undertray
  • 8.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 7.8% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 7.4% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Condition
      • 0.070% fail on Requirements
    • 0.21% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (87% better than other 2002 cars)
  • 7.0% fail on Tyres (22% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Condition (66% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.28% fail on Size/type
  • 6.6% fail on Visibility (18% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Wipers (22% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Washers (28% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.74% fail on Bonnet (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on View to rear
      • 0.18% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.11% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.11% fail on Windscreen
  • 1.8% fail on Steering (58% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Steering linkage components (62% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Track rod end (59% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.070% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.035% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.46% fail on Steering gear (50% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.21% fail on Power steering
      • 0.14% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.070% fail on Other components
      • 0.035% fail on Operation
    • 0.035% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.39% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.35% fail on Attachment
    • 0.070% fail on Condition
  • 0.32% fail on Identification of the vehicle (62% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Registration plates (62% better than other 2002 cars)
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages