Jaguar X-Type MOT Results
Registered in 200250.3% pass rate
from 7,889 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Jaguar X-Type is unusually good or bad.
-
24% fail on
Brakes
(40% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
(63% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 12% fail on Parking brake performance (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 7.7% fail on Rear wheels (95% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Front wheels (45% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Service brake performance (58% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Brake imbalance (41% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Brake performance not tested (80% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.076% fail on Brake operation
- 0.038% fail on Parking brake operation (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Gradient hand brake (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
7.7% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(22% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
7.4% fail on
Components
(24% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 6.8% fail on Pipes (57% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.71% fail on Hoses (50% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.089% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.35% fail on Leaks
- 0.089% fail on Operation
- 0.076% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
-
7.4% fail on
Components
(24% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
4.0% fail on
Hub components
(23% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Brake pads
- 1.3% fail on Brake discs (36% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Brake calipers (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Brake linings
-
2.6% fail on
Parking brake
(150% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Condition (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 2.6% fail on ABS (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.35% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.15% fail on Lever (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Cable
- 0.025% fail on Linkage
- 0.013% fail on Brake slack adjuster
- 0.013% fail on Relay lever
- 0.013% fail on Pivot
-
0.15% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.15% fail on
Pedal
- 0.10% fail on Condition
- 0.051% fail on Anti-slip (75% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Pedal
-
0.051% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.025% fail on Leaks
- 0.013% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
-
0.013% fail on
Components
- 0.013% fail on Pipes
- 0.013% fail on Electronic stability system
- 0.013% fail on Locking devices
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
(63% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
23% fail on
Suspension
(7.5% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
10% fail on
Prescribed areas
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 8.5% fail on Component mounting (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Subframe mounting (200% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Spring mounting (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
5.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 3.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (17% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (75% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Attachment (170% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.15% fail on Condition
-
5.5% fail on
Suspension arms
(14% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 1.5% fail on Condition (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.051% fail on Attachment
-
3.2% fail on
Coil springs
(23% better than other 2002 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Condition (26% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Location (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.5% fail on Rear (39% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Front (46% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Drive shafts
(74% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Front drive shafts
(74% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Constant velocity joints (74% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.038% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.038% fail on Drive shafts
-
1.1% fail on
Front drive shafts
(74% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Tie bars/rods
(3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Attachment
- 0.013% fail on Condition
-
0.85% fail on
Trailing arms
(170% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.66% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Attachment
-
0.80% fail on
Shock absorbers
(45% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Condition (45% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.70% fail on Front suspension joints (55% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.41% fail on
Radius arms
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.051% fail on Condition (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Attachment
-
0.19% fail on
Macpherson strut
(68% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Condition (68% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Sub-frames
(65% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.051% fail on Condition (72% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.025% fail on Attachment
-
0.10% fail on
Torque/reaction arms
(3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.013% fail on General condition
-
0.013% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.013% fail on Condition
- 0.013% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
-
10% fail on
Prescribed areas
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
20% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(27% better than other 2002 cars)
- 7.4% fail on Headlamp aim
- 5.9% fail on Registration plate lamp (17% better than other 2002 cars)
-
4.7% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.6% fail on Headlamp
- 0.063% fail on Switch
-
0.051% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.038% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
- 0.013% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
-
0.038% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.038% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
- 2.9% fail on Stop lamp (55% better than other 2002 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Position lamps
(61% better than other 2002 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Front lamps (56% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Rear lamps (73% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.025% fail on All position lamps
-
0.74% fail on
Direction indicators
(73% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.74% fail on
Flashing type
(73% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Individual lamps (78% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Side repeaters (69% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.13% fail on All direction indicators
-
0.74% fail on
Flashing type
(73% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Battery (61% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.18% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(88% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Fog lamp (91% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Switch
- 0.025% fail on Tell tale
- 0.16% fail on Horn (75% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.089% fail on
Hazard warning
(65% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.051% fail on Switch (71% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Lamp
- 0.013% fail on Tell tale
- 0.013% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.013% fail on Rear reflectors
-
11% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(160% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
10% fail on
Seat belts
(3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 10% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Condition
- 0.013% fail on Requirements
- 0.013% fail on Attachment
-
0.38% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(78% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.35% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (78% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Drivers airbag
-
10% fail on
Seat belts
(3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
9.6% fail on
Tyres
- 5.5% fail on Condition (41% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Tread depth (17% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Size/type
- 0.15% fail on Valve stem
-
7.8% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(18% better than other 2002 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Wipers (19% better than other 2002 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Washers (24% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Bonnet (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Windscreen
- 0.41% fail on Mirrors
- 0.013% fail on Indirect vision devices
-
6.8% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(140% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Body condition (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Vehicle structure
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Doors
(40% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Drivers (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Passengers front (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Passengers other
-
0.15% fail on
Seats
- 0.11% fail on Drivers
- 0.038% fail on Passengers
-
0.089% fail on
Load security
- 0.051% fail on Access panel (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Bootlid
- 0.038% fail on Body security
-
6.4% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(19% better than other 2002 cars)
- 5.7% fail on Emissions (66% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Exhaust system (88% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Emissions not tested (60% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.089% fail on
Fuel system
(89% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Cap (87% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.025% fail on System (90% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Tank
- 0.013% fail on Hose
-
1.6% fail on
Steering
(67% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Steering system
(69% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Track rod end (63% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Steering rack (85% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.076% fail on Ball joint (73% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.013% fail on
Free play
- 0.013% fail on Steering rack
- 0.013% fail on Drag link end
- 0.013% fail on Steering arm
-
0.19% fail on
Power steering
(63% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.076% fail on Operation
- 0.051% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.051% fail on Other components (70% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Pump
-
0.063% fail on
Steering control
- 0.025% fail on Steering wheel
- 0.025% fail on Steering column
-
0.013% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.013% fail on Universal joint
- 0.063% fail on Steering operation
- 0.013% fail on Locking devices
- 0.013% fail on Prescribed areas
-
1.3% fail on
Steering system
(69% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.91% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.91% fail on Registration plate
-
0.57% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.52% fail on Attachment (56% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.063% fail on Condition
-
0.013% fail on
Towbars
- 0.013% fail on Towbar
Read the Honest John Review
-
Jaguar X-Type (2001 - 2009)
Compact Jaguar, launched as V6 only with four wheel drive. Held price well at first.