MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Jaguar » X-Type » 2002

Jaguar X-Type MOT Results

Registered in 2002
50.3% pass rate
from 7,889 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Jaguar X-Type is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Brakes (40% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 14% fail on Brake performance (63% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 12% fail on Parking brake performance (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 7.7% fail on Rear wheels (95% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Front wheels (45% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Service brake performance (58% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Brake imbalance (41% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Brake performance not tested (80% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.076% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.038% fail on Parking brake operation (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Gradient hand brake (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 7.7% fail on Hydraulic systems (22% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 7.4% fail on Components (24% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 6.8% fail on Pipes (57% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.71% fail on Hoses (50% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.089% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.35% fail on Leaks
      • 0.089% fail on Operation
      • 0.076% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 4.0% fail on Hub components (23% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs (36% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Brake calipers (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Brake linings
    • 2.6% fail on Parking brake (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Condition (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on ABS (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.35% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.15% fail on Lever (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Cable
      • 0.025% fail on Linkage
      • 0.013% fail on Brake slack adjuster
      • 0.013% fail on Relay lever
      • 0.013% fail on Pivot
    • 0.15% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.15% fail on Pedal
        • 0.10% fail on Condition
        • 0.051% fail on Anti-slip (75% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.051% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.025% fail on Leaks
      • 0.013% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
      • 0.013% fail on Components
        • 0.013% fail on Pipes
    • 0.013% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.013% fail on Locking devices
  • 23% fail on Suspension (7.5% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 10% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 8.5% fail on Component mounting (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Subframe mounting (200% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Spring mounting (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (17% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (75% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Attachment (170% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.15% fail on Condition
    • 5.5% fail on Suspension arms (14% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.5% fail on Condition (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.051% fail on Attachment
    • 3.2% fail on Coil springs (23% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Condition (26% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Location (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.5% fail on Rear (39% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Front (46% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Drive shafts (74% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Front drive shafts (74% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Constant velocity joints (74% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.038% fail on Drive shafts
    • 1.1% fail on Tie bars/rods (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Attachment
      • 0.013% fail on Condition
    • 0.85% fail on Trailing arms (170% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Attachment
    • 0.80% fail on Shock absorbers (45% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Condition (45% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.70% fail on Front suspension joints (55% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Radius arms (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.051% fail on Condition (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Attachment
    • 0.19% fail on Macpherson strut (68% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Condition (68% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Sub-frames (65% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.051% fail on Condition (72% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.025% fail on Attachment
    • 0.10% fail on Torque/reaction arms (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.013% fail on General condition
    • 0.013% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.013% fail on Condition
    • 0.013% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 20% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (27% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 7.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 5.9% fail on Registration plate lamp (17% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.6% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.063% fail on Switch
      • 0.051% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.038% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
        • 0.013% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.038% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.038% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 2.9% fail on Stop lamp (55% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Position lamps (61% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Front lamps (56% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Rear lamps (73% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.74% fail on Direction indicators (73% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Flashing type (73% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.38% fail on Individual lamps (78% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on Side repeaters (69% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.37% fail on Battery (61% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.18% fail on Rear fog lamp (88% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Fog lamp (91% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Switch
      • 0.025% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.16% fail on Horn (75% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.089% fail on Hazard warning (65% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.051% fail on Switch (71% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Lamp
      • 0.013% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.013% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.013% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 11% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 10% fail on Seat belts (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 10% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Condition
      • 0.013% fail on Requirements
      • 0.013% fail on Attachment
    • 0.38% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (78% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (78% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 9.6% fail on Tyres
    • 5.5% fail on Condition (41% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Tread depth (17% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Size/type
    • 0.15% fail on Valve stem
  • 7.8% fail on Driver's view of the road (18% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Wipers (19% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Washers (24% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.58% fail on Bonnet (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.41% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.013% fail on Indirect vision devices
  • 6.8% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Body condition (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Doors (40% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Drivers (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Passengers front (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.15% fail on Seats
      • 0.11% fail on Drivers
      • 0.038% fail on Passengers
    • 0.089% fail on Load security
      • 0.051% fail on Access panel (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Bootlid
    • 0.038% fail on Body security
  • 6.4% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (19% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Emissions (66% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Exhaust system (88% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Emissions not tested (60% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.089% fail on Fuel system (89% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Cap (87% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on System (90% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Tank
      • 0.013% fail on Hose
  • 1.6% fail on Steering (67% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Steering system (69% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Track rod end (63% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Steering rack (85% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.076% fail on Ball joint (73% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Free play
        • 0.013% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.013% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.013% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.19% fail on Power steering (63% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.076% fail on Operation
      • 0.051% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.051% fail on Other components (70% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Pump
    • 0.063% fail on Steering control
      • 0.025% fail on Steering wheel
      • 0.025% fail on Steering column
      • 0.013% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.013% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.063% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.013% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.013% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.91% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.91% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.57% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.52% fail on Attachment (56% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.063% fail on Condition
  • 0.013% fail on Towbars
    • 0.013% fail on Towbar
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages