Jaguar S-Type MOT Results
Registered in 199959.4% pass rate
from 800 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Jaguar S-Type is unusually good or bad.
-
21% fail on
Suspension
(44% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
9.5% fail on
Suspension arms
(120% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 5.9% fail on Ball joint dust cover (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Ball joint
- 2.3% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.13% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
8.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(150% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 1.3% fail on Linkage (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Ball joint
- 3.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
2.5% fail on
Suspension rods
(18 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover (69 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Suspension rod
- 0.13% fail on Ball joint
-
2.4% fail on
Sub-frames
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Sub-frame (8 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.63% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
1.3% fail on
Other suspension component
(170% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.88% fail on Ball joint dust cover (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Ball joint
- 1.0% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.50% fail on
Springs
(79% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Coil springs
(89% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Coil spring (89% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
0.25% fail on
Coil springs
(89% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.13% fail on
Axles
- 0.13% fail on Swivel joints/housing
-
9.5% fail on
Suspension arms
(120% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
14% fail on
Brakes
-
6.9% fail on
Brake performance
-
3.6% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 3.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
3.0% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.0% fail on
Rbt
- 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.50% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
3.0% fail on
Rbt
-
1.4% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt
- 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.13% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt
-
0.63% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(75% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.50% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(80% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Service brake imbalance (69% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.13% fail on
Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.13% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.50% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(80% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
3.6% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
-
4.4% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.63% fail on Electronic stability control
-
3.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.4% fail on Brake pads
-
1.0% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.0% fail on Brake discs
-
0.13% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.13% fail on Lever
-
2.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes (59% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.75% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.38% fail on Pedal
- 0.38% fail on Hand lever
-
0.63% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.63% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.50% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.50% fail on Lever
-
0.13% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.13% fail on Valves
- 0.13% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
6.9% fail on
Brake performance
-
11% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
3.8% fail on
Direction indicators
(69% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Flashing type
(69% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Individual direction indicators (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.13% fail on All direction indicators
-
3.8% fail on
Flashing type
(69% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.0% fail on Headlamp
- 1.1% fail on Headlamp levelling device (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.25% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 1.5% fail on Stop lamp (59% better than other 1999 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.63% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.50% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.50% fail on Horn
-
0.13% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.13% fail on Switch
-
0.13% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.13% fail on Main beam tell-tale
- 0.13% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
3.8% fail on
Direction indicators
(69% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
9.4% fail on
Steering
(150% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
8.9% fail on
Steering linkage components
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 8.5% fail on Track rod end (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Ball joint
- 0.13% fail on Drag link end
-
0.38% fail on
Power steering
- 0.25% fail on Other components
- 0.13% fail on Pump
-
0.25% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.25% fail on Steering rack
-
0.13% fail on
Steering play
- 0.13% fail on Steering rack
-
8.9% fail on
Steering linkage components
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
7.9% fail on
Visibility
- 5.4% fail on Wipers
- 2.5% fail on Washers
- 0.50% fail on Bonnet
-
6.4% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(34% better than other 1999 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 2.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
1.4% fail on
Chassis
- 1.4% fail on Chassis condition
- 1.3% fail on Exhaust system (61% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.75% fail on
Doors
-
0.63% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.63% fail on Door condition
-
0.13% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.13% fail on Door condition
-
0.13% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.13% fail on Door condition
-
0.63% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.25% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.25% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.25% fail on
Body
- 0.25% fail on Panel
-
0.25% fail on
Seats
- 0.25% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.13% fail on Undertray
-
2.5% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
-
5.3% fail on
Tyres
- 2.9% fail on Condition
- 2.8% fail on Tread depth
- 0.13% fail on Size/type
-
4.0% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(51% better than other 1999 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(52% better than other 1999 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Spark ignition
(49% better than other 1999 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Catalyst emissions (56% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.88% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.25% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.13% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.13% fail on Oxygen sensor
- 0.13% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
3.8% fail on
Spark ignition
(49% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.25% fail on Other leaks
-
3.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(52% better than other 1999 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
3.3% fail on
Seat belts
- 3.0% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.25% fail on Condition
- 0.75% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
3.3% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.63% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.63% fail on Attachment
-
0.50% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.50% fail on Registration plates