MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Jaguar » F-Pace » 2017

Jaguar F-Pace MOT Results

Registered in 2017
85.1% pass rate
from 12,690 tests in 2021
(19% worse than other 2017 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the Jaguar F-Pace is unusually good or bad.

  • 4.6% fail on Visibility (24% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Wipers (40% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.72% fail on Washers (26% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Bonnet (8 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.079% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.079% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.024% fail on View to rear
      • 0.024% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.0079% fail on Driver's view
  • 3.1% fail on Tyres
    • 1.9% fail on Tread depth (21% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Condition (33% better than other 2017 cars)
  • 2.6% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.047% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.1% fail on Headlamps (110% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Headlamp levelling device (14 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (7 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Headlamp (59% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (130% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Rear fog lamp (130% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Rear fog lamp (130% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.16% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.13% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.024% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.0079% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.047% fail on Stop lamp (86% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.039% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.039% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.024% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.0079% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.0079% fail on Horn
    • 0.016% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (92% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.0079% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.0079% fail on Switch
    • 0.0079% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.0079% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 2.6% fail on Steering (15 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Steering linkage components (24 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Track rod end (26 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.055% fail on Ball joint (10 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.0079% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.0079% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.0079% fail on Operation
  • 2.3% fail on Brakes
    • 1.8% fail on Mechanical brake components (23% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Brake linings and pads (32% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Brake pads (32% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.0079% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.27% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.27% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.32% fail on Brake performance (35% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Service brake performance (58% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Rbt (60% better than other 2017 cars)
          • 0.10% fail on Service brake performance (55% better than other 2017 cars)
          • 0.0079% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.0079% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.0079% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.095% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.055% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.032% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.0079% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
      • 0.079% fail on Brake performance not tested (140% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.032% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.024% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.0079% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.0079% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.0079% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.0079% fail on Rbt
          • 0.0079% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 0.13% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.11% fail on Anti-lock braking system (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.071% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.016% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.10% fail on Flexible brake hoses (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.087% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.087% fail on Electronic parking brake (4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.0079% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.0079% fail on Pedal
    • 0.0079% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.0079% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 0.54% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.51% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.41% fail on Compression ignition (91% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (99% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.071% fail on Emissions not tested (6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.032% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 0.10% fail on Spark ignition (67% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.032% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.024% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.0079% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 0.45% fail on Identification of the vehicle (120% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.45% fail on Registration plates (120% worse than other 2017 cars)
  • 0.41% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.19% fail on Doors (4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Other passenger's door (10 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Door condition (10 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.016% fail on Door condition
    • 0.12% fail on Transmission
      • 0.10% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.10% fail on Joints
      • 0.016% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.016% fail on Joints
    • 0.032% fail on Body
      • 0.024% fail on Other body component
      • 0.0079% fail on Panel
    • 0.024% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.016% fail on Pipe
      • 0.0079% fail on Hose
    • 0.024% fail on Seats
      • 0.016% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.0079% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.016% fail on Exhaust system (79% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.016% fail on Bumpers
  • 0.27% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.20% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (96% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.047% fail on Seat belts (64% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.039% fail on Condition (68% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.0079% fail on Requirements
    • 0.016% fail on Airbags (5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Drivers airbag (6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
  • 0.24% fail on Suspension (72% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.10% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.039% fail on Suspension arm (6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.0079% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.039% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.024% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.024% fail on Anti-roll bars (82% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.024% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 0.0079% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.0079% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 0.16% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.16% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

  • Jaguar F-Pace (2016 on)
    Handles incredibly well for an SUV. Very quiet and refined at speed. Huge boot space. Wide range of engines, including plug-in hybrid and monstrous V8 SVR.

    Search Good Garages