Jaguar F-Pace MOT Results

Registered in 2016
87.6% pass rate
from 7,911 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Jaguar F-Pace is unusually good or bad.

  • 3.0% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.025% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.0% fail on Headlamps (110% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Headlamp levelling device (16 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp (72% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.24% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.23% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.013% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.20% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.20% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.20% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.063% fail on Stop lamp (84% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.038% fail on Position lamps (78% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Position lamp (77% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.025% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (91% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.025% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.013% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.013% fail on Horn
    • 0.013% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.013% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.013% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 2.8% fail on Steering (21 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Steering linkage components (29 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Track rod end (33 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Ball joint (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.025% fail on Steering play (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Steering rack (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.013% fail on Power steering
      • 0.013% fail on Operation
  • 2.7% fail on Tyres (23% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.1% fail on Condition (41% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.013% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
  • 1.6% fail on Visibility (44% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.95% fail on Wipers (49% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Washers (47% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.088% fail on Bonnet (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.063% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.063% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.051% fail on View to rear
      • 0.051% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.038% fail on Driver's view
  • 1.5% fail on Brakes (26% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.97% fail on Brake linings and pads (25% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.97% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.27% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.27% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.20% fail on Brake performance (52% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.076% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.063% fail on Service brake performance (73% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.025% fail on Rbt (89% better than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.013% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.013% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.025% fail on Decelerometer (16 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.025% fail on Service brake performance (16 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.013% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.013% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.051% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.038% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.013% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.025% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.025% fail on Rbt
          • 0.025% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.013% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.013% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
    • 0.10% fail on Flexible brake hoses (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.063% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.063% fail on Electronic parking brake (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.063% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.063% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.025% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.051% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.051% fail on Pedal
  • 0.59% fail on Identification of the vehicle (150% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.59% fail on Registration plates (150% worse than other 2016 cars)
  • 0.51% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.48% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.29% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.23% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (92% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.063% fail on Emissions not tested (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.19% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.013% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.013% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.013% fail on Undertray
    • 0.013% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.013% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.21% fail on Suspension (65% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.076% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.051% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.025% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.025% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.038% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.025% fail on Pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.025% fail on Shock absorbers (86% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.025% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.025% fail on Ball joint
  • 0.20% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.15% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.051% fail on Seat belts (69% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.051% fail on Condition
  • 0.16% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.063% fail on Transmission
      • 0.051% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.051% fail on Joints
      • 0.013% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.013% fail on Joints
    • 0.063% fail on Doors
      • 0.063% fail on Other passenger's door (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.063% fail on Door condition (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.013% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.013% fail on Load security
      • 0.013% fail on Access panel
    • 0.013% fail on Seats
      • 0.013% fail on Driver's seat
  • 0.025% fail on Road Wheels (82% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.025% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

  • Jaguar F-Pace (2016 on)
    Handles incredibly well for an SUV. Very quiet and refined at speed. Huge boot space. Wide range of engines, including plug-in hybrid and monstrous V8 SVR.

    Search Good Garages