MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Jaguar » F-Pace » 2016

Jaguar F-Pace MOT Results

Registered in 2016
84.9% pass rate
from 7,720 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Jaguar F-Pace is unusually good or bad.

  • 4.6% fail on Visibility (17% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Wipers (32% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.67% fail on Washers (40% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Bonnet (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.091% fail on Windscreen
      • 0.013% fail on Window
    • 0.026% fail on View to rear
      • 0.026% fail on Mirrors
  • 2.9% fail on Tyres (27% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.1% fail on Condition (46% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.013% fail on Size/type
  • 2.8% fail on Brakes
    • 2.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.9% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.9% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.013% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.45% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.45% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.31% fail on Brake performance (57% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Brake performance not tested (180% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.091% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.026% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.065% fail on Service brake performance (84% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.065% fail on Rbt (84% better than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.052% fail on Service brake performance (84% better than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.013% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.039% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.039% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.026% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.013% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 0.17% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.13% fail on Electronic stability control (150% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.078% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.013% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.10% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.10% fail on Electronic parking brake (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Flexible brake hoses (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.039% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.026% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.013% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 2.5% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (29% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.026% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.78% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.35% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Headlamp levelling device (9 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Headlamp (82% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Rear fog lamp (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.40% fail on Rear fog lamp (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Direction indicators (64% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Flashing type (64% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Side repeaters (62% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.026% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.039% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.026% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.013% fail on Horn
    • 0.013% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.013% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.013% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.013% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 2.2% fail on Steering (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Steering linkage components (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Track rod end (9 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.039% fail on Power steering (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.039% fail on Operation (13 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  • 0.95% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.91% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.62% fail on Compression ignition (83% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.54% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.052% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.026% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 0.28% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.26% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.026% fail on Catalyst emissions (85% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.039% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.026% fail on Other leaks (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 0.57% fail on Identification of the vehicle (170% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.57% fail on Registration plates (170% worse than other 2016 cars)
  • 0.45% fail on Suspension (78% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Suspension arms (53% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.039% fail on Ball joint (80% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.039% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.013% fail on Suspension arm
    • 0.13% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.039% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.013% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.013% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.013% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.013% fail on Axles
      • 0.013% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.013% fail on Springs
      • 0.013% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.013% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.013% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.013% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.013% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 0.36% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.13% fail on Doors (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Other passenger's door (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Door condition (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.013% fail on Door condition
    • 0.091% fail on Transmission
      • 0.078% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.078% fail on Joints
      • 0.013% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.013% fail on Bearing housing
    • 0.065% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.052% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.026% fail on Pipe (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.026% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.026% fail on Body
      • 0.013% fail on Body condition
      • 0.013% fail on Other body component
  • 0.31% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.27% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (130% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.026% fail on Airbags (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.026% fail on Drivers airbag (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.013% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.013% fail on Condition
  • 0.10% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.091% fail on Attachment
    • 0.013% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

  • Jaguar F-Pace (2016 on)
    Handles incredibly well for an SUV. Very quiet and refined at speed. Huge boot space. Wide range of engines, including plug-in hybrid and monstrous V8 SVR.

    Search Good Garages