Isuzu Trooper MOT Results

Registered in 2002
57.5% pass rate
from 612 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Isuzu Trooper is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Body, chassis, structure (91% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 8.2% fail on Transmission (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 7.5% fail on Drive shafts (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 7.2% fail on Joints (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Drive shaft
        • 0.16% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.98% fail on Prop shafts (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.98% fail on Joints (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 7.2% fail on Exhaust system (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Chassis (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Chassis condition (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.82% fail on Pipe (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Hose (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Tank
    • 0.65% fail on Cabs (9 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Prescribed areas (9 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on Body
      • 0.16% fail on Mounting fixings
      • 0.16% fail on Panel
      • 0.16% fail on Other body component
    • 0.33% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.33% fail on Doors
      • 0.16% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.16% fail on Door condition
      • 0.16% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.16% fail on Door condition
    • 0.16% fail on Seats
      • 0.16% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 19% fail on Brakes (32% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 13% fail on Brake performance (59% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Service brake performance (77% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 5.2% fail on Rbt (71% worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 4.4% fail on Service brake performance (71% worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Decelerometer (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.33% fail on Service brake performance (9 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (96% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 3.8% fail on Rbt (sp) (91% worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 2.6% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.16% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 3.8% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 3.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.65% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 2.1% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt
          • 2.0% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.16% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.16% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.98% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 6.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes (92% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.65% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.65% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.49% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.33% fail on Cable
        • 0.16% fail on Lever
    • 0.82% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.49% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.49% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Prescribed areas (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.49% fail on Other braking system component (19 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.33% fail on Pedal
    • 0.16% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.16% fail on Lever
    • 0.16% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.16% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.16% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 6.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.1% fail on Ball joint (77% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover (190% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.16% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 5.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.9% fail on Linkage ball joints (200% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.33% fail on Linkage
      • 0.16% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.16% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 3.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.8% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.8% fail on Springs
      • 1.5% fail on Coil springs (58% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Coil spring (58% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.8% fail on Shock absorbers (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.65% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.49% fail on Ball joint dust cover (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.16% fail on Suspension rod
    • 0.16% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.16% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.9% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (200% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 3.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.16% fail on All direction indicators
      • 0.16% fail on Semaphore
        • 0.16% fail on Switch
    • 1.3% fail on Position lamps (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Position lamp (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Headlamps (77% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Headlamp (78% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.1% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.49% fail on Trailer electrical socket (39 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.33% fail on Horn
    • 0.65% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (71% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.33% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.16% fail on Switch
  • 8.5% fail on Visibility
    • 5.2% fail on Wipers
    • 3.4% fail on Washers
    • 0.16% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.16% fail on Windscreen
  • 7.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 6.9% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 6.0% fail on Compression ignition (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 2.9% fail on Emissions not tested (15 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 2.8% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.49% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 0.82% fail on Spark ignition (86% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.82% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.16% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 1.3% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.65% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.65% fail on Other leaks (9 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  • 4.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 4.2% fail on Seat belts (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Prescribed areas (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Condition
      • 0.16% fail on Requirements
    • 1.1% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 2.6% fail on Tyres (54% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.33% fail on Condition (87% better than other 2002 cars)
  • 2.5% fail on Steering
    • 1.8% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.98% fail on Track rod end (62% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.16% fail on Intermediate drop arm
      • 0.16% fail on Other components
        • 0.16% fail on Steering linkage
      • 0.16% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.33% fail on Steering play
      • 0.16% fail on Steering box
      • 0.16% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.16% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.16% fail on Steering box
    • 0.16% fail on Steering wheel
  • 1.5% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.82% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.82% fail on Attachment
  • 0.16% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.16% fail on Belt(s)/padding

Search Good Garages