Isuzu Trooper MOT Results
Registered in 200257.5% pass rate
from 612 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Isuzu Trooper is unusually good or bad.
-
19% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(91% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
8.2% fail on
Transmission
(130% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
7.5% fail on
Drive shafts
(120% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 7.2% fail on Joints (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Drive shaft
- 0.16% fail on Flexible couplings
-
0.98% fail on
Prop shafts
(4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.98% fail on Joints (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
7.5% fail on
Drive shafts
(120% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 7.2% fail on Exhaust system (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(120% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Chassis
(150% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Chassis condition (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.82% fail on Pipe (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Hose (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Tank
-
0.65% fail on
Cabs
(9 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Prescribed areas (9 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.49% fail on
Body
- 0.16% fail on Mounting fixings
- 0.16% fail on Panel
- 0.16% fail on Other body component
- 0.33% fail on Bumpers
-
0.33% fail on
Doors
-
0.16% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.16% fail on Door condition
-
0.16% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.16% fail on Door condition
-
0.16% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
0.16% fail on
Seats
- 0.16% fail on Passenger's seat
-
8.2% fail on
Transmission
(130% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
19% fail on
Brakes
(32% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
13% fail on
Brake performance
(59% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
5.6% fail on
Service brake performance
(77% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Rbt
(71% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Service brake performance (71% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.33% fail on
Decelerometer
(8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Service brake performance (9 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Rbt
(71% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(96% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(91% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.16% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
3.8% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(91% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 3.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.65% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
2.1% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
2.0% fail on
Rbt
- 2.0% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.16% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.16% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
2.0% fail on
Rbt
- 0.98% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
5.6% fail on
Service brake performance
(77% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 6.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes (92% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.1% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.1% fail on Brake pads
-
0.65% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.65% fail on Brake discs
-
0.49% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.33% fail on Cable
- 0.16% fail on Lever
-
2.1% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.82% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.49% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.49% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.49% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
(5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.49% fail on
Prescribed areas
(8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Other braking system component (19 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.49% fail on
Prescribed areas
(8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.33% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.33% fail on Pedal
-
0.16% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.16% fail on Lever
- 0.16% fail on Load sensing valves
-
0.16% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.16% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
13% fail on
Brake performance
(59% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
18% fail on
Suspension
-
6.9% fail on
Suspension arms
- 4.1% fail on Ball joint (77% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover (190% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.16% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
5.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 3.9% fail on Linkage ball joints (200% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.33% fail on Linkage
- 0.16% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.16% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 3.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 1.8% fail on Wheel bearings
-
1.8% fail on
Springs
-
1.5% fail on
Coil springs
(58% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Coil spring (58% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
1.5% fail on
Coil springs
(58% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Shock absorbers (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.65% fail on Ball joint
- 0.49% fail on Ball joint dust cover (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.16% fail on Suspension rod
-
0.16% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.16% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
6.9% fail on
Suspension arms
-
14% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 4.4% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.9% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim
-
3.9% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(200% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.5% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.16% fail on All direction indicators
-
0.16% fail on
Semaphore
- 0.16% fail on Switch
-
1.5% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.3% fail on
Position lamps
(4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Position lamp (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Headlamps
(77% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.98% fail on Headlamp (78% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
1.1% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.49% fail on Trailer electrical socket (39 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.33% fail on Horn
- 0.65% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (71% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.33% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.33% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.16% fail on Switch
-
8.5% fail on
Visibility
- 5.2% fail on Wipers
- 3.4% fail on Washers
-
0.16% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.16% fail on Windscreen
-
7.7% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
6.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
6.0% fail on
Compression ignition
(5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Emissions not tested (15 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
0.82% fail on
Spark ignition
(86% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.16% fail on Catalyst emissions
-
6.0% fail on
Compression ignition
(5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.65% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.65% fail on Other leaks (9 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
6.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.9% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
4.2% fail on
Seat belts
(110% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Prescribed areas (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Condition
- 0.16% fail on Requirements
- 1.1% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
4.2% fail on
Seat belts
(110% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Tyres
(54% better than other 2002 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Tread depth
- 0.33% fail on Condition (87% better than other 2002 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Steering
-
1.8% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.98% fail on Track rod end (62% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Ball joint
- 0.16% fail on Intermediate drop arm
-
0.16% fail on
Other components
- 0.16% fail on Steering linkage
- 0.16% fail on Locking devices
-
0.33% fail on
Steering play
- 0.16% fail on Steering box
- 0.16% fail on Steering rack
-
0.16% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.16% fail on Steering box
- 0.16% fail on Steering wheel
-
1.8% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
1.5% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.5% fail on Registration plates
-
0.82% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.82% fail on Attachment
-
0.16% fail on
Seat belt installation check
- 0.16% fail on Belt(s)/padding