Isuzu Trooper MOT Results
Registered in 200254.8% pass rate
from 922 tests in 2017
(8.8% better than other 2002 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Isuzu Trooper is unusually good or bad.
-
23% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(16% better than other 2002 cars)
-
8.8% fail on
Position lamps
- 7.0% fail on Front lamps
- 2.0% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.33% fail on All position lamps
- 6.6% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 5.4% fail on Stop lamp
- 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim (59% better than other 2002 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 2.3% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.43% fail on Tell tale (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Switch
-
1.3% fail on
Headlamps
(73% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Headlamp (72% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Battery
- 0.98% fail on Trailer electrical socket (32 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.98% fail on
Direction indicators
(64% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.98% fail on
Flashing type
(64% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Individual lamps (62% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.11% fail on All direction indicators
-
0.98% fail on
Flashing type
(64% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.22% fail on Horn
-
0.11% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.11% fail on Switch
-
8.8% fail on
Position lamps
-
22% fail on
Suspension
-
11% fail on
Drive shafts
(170% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
11% fail on
Front drive shafts
(170% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 11% fail on Constant velocity joints (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Drive shafts (12 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Couplings
-
0.22% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.22% fail on Drive shafts
-
11% fail on
Front drive shafts
(170% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
4.7% fail on
Shock absorbers
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.8% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.33% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.22% fail on Attachment
- 0.11% fail on Condition
-
3.5% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 2.7% fail on Front suspension joints (76% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.8% fail on Front (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Coil springs
(74% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Condition (73% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.87% fail on
Prescribed areas
(73% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.76% fail on Component mounting (70% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Subframe mounting
-
11% fail on
Drive shafts
(170% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
20% fail on
Brakes
-
12% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(88% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
11% fail on
Components
(80% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 9.4% fail on Pipes (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Hoses
- 0.33% fail on Valves
- 0.11% fail on Cylinders
- 0.11% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.98% fail on Leaks (170% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Operation
-
11% fail on
Components
(80% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
9.5% fail on
Brake performance
- 4.0% fail on Rear wheels
- 3.1% fail on Parking brake performance
- 2.9% fail on Front wheels
- 2.2% fail on Service brake performance (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.76% fail on Brake performance not tested (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Brake operation (12 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.11% fail on Parking brake operation
-
2.4% fail on
Hub components
- 1.2% fail on Brake pads
- 0.76% fail on Brake discs
- 0.65% fail on Brake calipers (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Brake back plates (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.98% fail on ABS
- 0.76% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.43% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.43% fail on
Pedal
- 0.33% fail on Condition
- 0.11% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.43% fail on
Pedal
-
0.22% fail on
Parking brake
(79% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Condition (79% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Locking devices (28 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.11% fail on Cable
-
0.11% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.11% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
-
0.11% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.11% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
-
12% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(88% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
10.0% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 6.7% fail on Exhaust system (48% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Fuel system
(170% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Pipe (12 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Tank
- 0.43% fail on System
- 0.11% fail on Cap
- 2.0% fail on Emissions not tested (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Emissions (69% better than other 2002 cars)
-
8.4% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 4.9% fail on Wipers
- 3.3% fail on Washers
- 0.65% fail on Mirrors
- 0.54% fail on Windscreen
-
4.9% fail on
Tyres
(47% better than other 2002 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Tread depth (38% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Condition (55% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Size/type
- 0.11% fail on Valve stem
-
3.5% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 2.3% fail on Body condition (92% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.65% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.65% fail on Chassis
- 0.33% fail on Body security (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Speedometer (9 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Seats
- 0.11% fail on Passengers
-
3.4% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
2.0% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 1.7% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
- 0.22% fail on Drivers airbag
-
1.6% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.33% fail on Condition
-
2.0% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
-
2.6% fail on
Steering
(47% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Steering system
(70% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Track rod end (78% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Steering box (14 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Ball joint
- 0.22% fail on Drag link end
-
0.98% fail on
Steering control
(11 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.98% fail on Steering column (27 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Power steering
- 0.22% fail on Operation
- 0.22% fail on Other components
- 0.11% fail on Locking devices
-
1.3% fail on
Steering system
(70% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.1% fail on Registration plate
-
0.33% fail on
Towbars
(5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Vehicle structure
- 0.11% fail on Towbar
-
0.22% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.22% fail on Attachment