Isuzu Trooper MOT Results

Registered in 1999
54.1% pass rate
from 828 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Isuzu Trooper is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 8.7% fail on Position lamps (37% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 7.0% fail on Front lamps (49% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Rear lamps
    • 6.0% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 5.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim (35% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 2.3% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.12% fail on Tell tale
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamps (54% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp (59% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.12% fail on Headlamp levelling device
        • 0.12% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.12% fail on Matched pair
    • 1.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.85% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.60% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.36% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.60% fail on Trailer electrical socket (14 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on Battery
    • 0.36% fail on Rear reflectors (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.24% fail on Tell tale (15 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Lamp
    • 0.36% fail on Horn
    • 0.24% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 22% fail on Suspension
    • 8.7% fail on Drive shafts (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 8.7% fail on Front drive shafts (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 8.7% fail on Constant velocity joints (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 5.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.7% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.48% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.24% fail on Attachment
      • 0.12% fail on Condition
    • 4.1% fail on Shock absorbers (160% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Condition (160% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.12% fail on Condition
    • 3.3% fail on Wheel bearings (76% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Front (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Prescribed areas (62% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Component mounting (60% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Subframe mounting (79% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Spring mounting
    • 2.2% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.2% fail on Coil springs (57% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Condition (55% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on General condition
    • 0.12% fail on Leaf springs
      • 0.12% fail on Pins and bushes
        • 0.12% fail on Shackle
    • 0.12% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.12% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.12% fail on Panhard rods
      • 0.12% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 21% fail on Brakes
    • 13% fail on Hydraulic systems (89% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 11% fail on Components (84% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 9.8% fail on Pipes (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Hoses
        • 0.97% fail on Valves
        • 0.24% fail on Reservoirs
      • 1.2% fail on Leaks (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Operation (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 10% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.9% fail on Rear wheels
      • 3.4% fail on Front wheels
      • 2.9% fail on Service brake performance (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Parking brake performance (43% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake performance not tested (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.97% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.24% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.12% fail on Gradient hand brake
    • 3.0% fail on Hub components
      • 2.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.60% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.24% fail on Brake back plates (9 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.12% fail on Brake calipers
    • 1.6% fail on ABS
    • 0.60% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.60% fail on Condition
    • 0.60% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.24% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.24% fail on Pedal
        • 0.24% fail on Condition
    • 0.12% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.12% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.12% fail on Cable
  • 11% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 7.2% fail on Exhaust system (40% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Fuel system (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Pipe (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Tank (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on System
      • 0.24% fail on Hose
    • 1.9% fail on Emissions (71% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 9.4% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.2% fail on Wipers
    • 4.5% fail on Washers
    • 0.12% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.12% fail on Mirrors
  • 6.6% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.9% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.7% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.12% fail on Requirements
    • 3.0% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (74% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (74% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 5.2% fail on Tyres (37% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.8% fail on Condition (49% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Size/type
  • 5.1% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 3.5% fail on Body condition (70% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.7% fail on Chassis
    • 0.24% fail on Doors
      • 0.12% fail on Drivers
      • 0.12% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.12% fail on Body security
  • 3.0% fail on Registration plates and VIN (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Registration plate (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
  • 2.9% fail on Steering
    • 1.7% fail on Steering system (56% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Track rod end (63% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.36% fail on Steering box (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Free play
        • 0.12% fail on Steering box
    • 0.60% fail on Power steering
      • 0.36% fail on Operation
      • 0.24% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.12% fail on Pump
      • 0.12% fail on Other components
    • 0.36% fail on Prescribed areas (8 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Steering control
      • 0.12% fail on Steering column
      • 0.12% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.12% fail on Universal joint
  • 1.2% fail on Towbars (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.97% fail on Vehicle structure (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Towbar (9 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  • 0.85% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.85% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)

Search Good Garages