Isuzu Trooper MOT Results

Registered in 1998
58.1% pass rate
from 544 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 cars and highlighted areas where the Isuzu Trooper is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Body, chassis, structure (70% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 11% fail on Transmission (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 10% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 9.6% fail on Joints (190% worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 0.55% fail on Drive shaft (16 times worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Flexible couplings
        • 0.18% fail on Bearing housing
      • 0.74% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.74% fail on Joints
    • 6.1% fail on Exhaust system (67% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.7% fail on Chassis
      • 1.7% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.5% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.74% fail on Pipe (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Tank
      • 0.18% fail on System
    • 1.3% fail on Bumpers (4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.74% fail on Body
      • 0.55% fail on Panel
      • 0.18% fail on Other body component
    • 0.55% fail on Towbar
      • 0.55% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.37% fail on Cabs
      • 0.37% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.18% fail on Seats
      • 0.18% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.18% fail on Undertray
  • 18% fail on Brakes (32% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 9.9% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.0% fail on Rbt
          • 3.9% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.37% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.37% fail on Decelerometer (10 times worse than other 1998 cars)
          • 0.37% fail on Service brake performance (10 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.74% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.37% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt
          • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.55% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.18% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.18% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.7% fail on Brake performance not tested (4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 7.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes (160% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.5% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.37% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.18% fail on Cable
        • 0.18% fail on Linkage
      • 0.18% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.18% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.8% fail on Load sensing valves (7 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.5% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.74% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.74% fail on Pedal
      • 0.18% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.55% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.55% fail on Lever
    • 0.37% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.37% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.37% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.37% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.18% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
        • 0.18% fail on Other braking system component
    • 0.18% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.18% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.18% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 17% fail on Suspension
    • 5.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.8% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.37% fail on Suspension arm
    • 4.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.0% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.92% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.74% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.55% fail on Linkage
      • 0.37% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.18% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint
    • 3.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.9% fail on Wheel bearings (110% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.1% fail on Springs
      • 1.1% fail on Coil springs
        • 1.1% fail on Coil spring
    • 1.1% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.37% fail on Other suspension component (5 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.37% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.37% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.18% fail on Suspension rod
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.18% fail on Axles
      • 0.18% fail on Swivel joints/housing
    • 0.18% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.18% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.9% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.8% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.1% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.55% fail on Horn
      • 0.18% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 1.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.18% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.92% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.92% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.55% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.37% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.18% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.18% fail on Switch
    • 0.18% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 7.5% fail on Visibility
    • 4.0% fail on Washers
    • 3.3% fail on Wipers
    • 0.37% fail on View to rear
      • 0.37% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.18% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.18% fail on Windscreen
  • 6.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 6.1% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 5.1% fail on Compression ignition (5 times worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 2.8% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (7 times worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Emissions not tested (10 times worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 0.37% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.18% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.92% fail on Spark ignition (87% better than other 1998 cars)
        • 0.74% fail on Catalyst emissions (88% better than other 1998 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.55% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.37% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.18% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 3.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.9% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.6% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.37% fail on Condition
    • 0.37% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.18% fail on Airbags
      • 0.18% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 3.1% fail on Tyres
    • 2.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.92% fail on Condition
    • 0.37% fail on Size/type
  • 2.0% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 2.0% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.5% fail on Steering (61% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Steering linkage components (75% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.18% fail on Lock stop
    • 0.37% fail on Power steering
      • 0.18% fail on Operation
      • 0.18% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.18% fail on Other components
    • 0.37% fail on Steering column (12 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Steering play
      • 0.18% fail on Steering box
  • 0.37% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.37% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages