Isuzu Trooper MOT Results

Registered in 1995
53.1% pass rate
from 271 tests in 2020
(23% worse than other 1995 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Isuzu Trooper is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (150% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 7.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (150% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 7.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (160% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.37% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.6% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.74% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.37% fail on Side repeaters
    • 3.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.0% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.6% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.5% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.37% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.37% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.37% fail on Horn
    • 1.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.74% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.74% fail on Switch
  • 21% fail on Brakes (69% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 11% fail on Brake performance (59% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (110% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 5.9% fail on Rbt (sp) (110% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.37% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 4.8% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 4.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 3.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.37% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 4.4% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 4.4% fail on Rbt (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 4.1% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 0.37% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 3.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.7% fail on Rbt
          • 3.0% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.74% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.37% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 8.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes (200% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.8% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.37% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.37% fail on Cable
    • 0.74% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.74% fail on Pedal
    • 0.74% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.74% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.74% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.37% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.37% fail on Operation
    • 0.37% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.37% fail on Lever
    • 0.37% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.37% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.37% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.37% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.37% fail on Load sensing valves
  • 20% fail on Suspension (48% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Suspension arms (89% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Ball joint (170% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.6% fail on Linkage ball joints (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Linkage
      • 0.37% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.37% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.37% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.37% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 4.4% fail on Shock absorbers (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.5% fail on Other suspension component
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.74% fail on Springs
      • 0.74% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.74% fail on Coil spring
  • 19% fail on Body, chassis, structure (69% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 8.9% fail on Exhaust system (140% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Transmission
      • 5.2% fail on Drive shafts (110% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 5.2% fail on Joints (110% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.37% fail on Prop shaft
    • 4.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure (150% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (150% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Chassis
      • 1.8% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.5% fail on Body
      • 0.74% fail on Mounting fixings (11 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Panel
      • 0.37% fail on Body condition
    • 1.1% fail on Towbar
      • 0.74% fail on Other towbar components (18 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.74% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.37% fail on Tank
      • 0.37% fail on Pipe
    • 0.74% fail on Cabs
      • 0.74% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.37% fail on Bumpers
  • 10% fail on Visibility
    • 5.2% fail on Wipers
    • 4.4% fail on Washers
    • 1.1% fail on View to rear
      • 1.1% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.74% fail on Driver's view
  • 5.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.4% fail on Compression ignition (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Emissions not tested (8 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.37% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 0.37% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.37% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 1.1% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.74% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.37% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.37% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.37% fail on Undertray
  • 5.2% fail on Tyres
    • 3.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.37% fail on Size/type
  • 3.7% fail on Steering
    • 2.2% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.2% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.74% fail on Prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.74% fail on Steering play
      • 0.74% fail on Steering box (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.37% fail on Flexible coupling
  • 2.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.6% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.74% fail on Condition
  • 1.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.37% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.37% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages