Isuzu Trooper MOT Results

Registered in 1995
63.7% pass rate
from 190 tests in 2020
(2.6% worse than other 1995 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Isuzu Trooper is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Brakes (40% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 9.5% fail on Brake performance (40% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (74% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 3.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (45% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Brake performance not tested (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Parking brake performance (120% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt (120% worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 2.1% fail on Parking brake performance (160% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance (37% better than other 1995 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt (34% better than other 1995 cars)
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance (21% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (46% better than other 1995 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (62% better than other 1995 cars)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance (25% better than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.53% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
    • 7.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Mechanical brake components (40% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.53% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.53% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.53% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.53% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.53% fail on Operation
  • 15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (8.2% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 6.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (160% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 6.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (160% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 6.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (170% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.53% fail on Switch
    • 5.8% fail on Direction indicators (130% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 5.8% fail on Flashing type (130% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 4.2% fail on Individual direction indicators (170% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Side repeaters (22% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.53% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim (41% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim (38% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Stop lamp (51% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Headlamps (63% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp (60% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Position lamps (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Position lamp (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Electrical equipment (35% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.53% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.53% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.53% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.53% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 14% fail on Body, chassis, structure (42% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 5.8% fail on Transmission (130% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Drive shafts (130% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 4.7% fail on Joints (130% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Prop shafts (170% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Exhaust system (33% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure (68% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (70% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Fuel system (130% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Pipe (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Tank
    • 1.6% fail on Body (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Mounting fixings
      • 0.53% fail on Panel
      • 0.53% fail on Other body component
    • 1.1% fail on Towbar (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Vehicle structure (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.53% fail on Chassis
      • 0.53% fail on Chassis condition
  • 13% fail on Suspension (5.5% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Suspension arms (31% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Ball joint (110% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover (51% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Suspension arm
    • 3.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (18% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Wheel bearings (81% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Shock absorbers (88% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (0.13% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage ball joints (120% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.53% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.1% fail on Springs (7.6% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Coil springs (39% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Coil spring (48% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.53% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.53% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 5.8% fail on Visibility (14% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Wipers (27% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Washers (49% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Driver's view (10 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.53% fail on View to rear
      • 0.53% fail on Mirrors
  • 5.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (21% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Exhaust emissions (30% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Compression ignition (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Emissions not tested (12 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.53% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.53% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.53% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 2.1% fail on Fluid leaks (180% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Engine oil leaks (82% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Transmission oil leaks (18 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  • 2.1% fail on Steering (51% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Steering linkage components (59% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.53% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.53% fail on Steering column
    • 0.53% fail on Steering play
      • 0.53% fail on Steering box
  • 2.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (36% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Seat belts (25% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Condition (200% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 1.6% fail on Identification of the vehicle (77% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plates (78% worse than other 1995 cars)
  • 1.1% fail on Road Wheels (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  • 1.1% fail on Tyres (67% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Condition (31% better than other 1995 cars)

Search Good Garages