Isuzu Trooper MOT Results

Registered in 1995

64.6% pass rate

from 82 tests in 2021

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Isuzu Trooper is unusually good or bad.

16% fail on Brakes
- 13% fail on Brake performance
  - 4.9% fail on Service brake performance
    - 4.9% fail on Rbt
      - 3.7% fail on Service brake performance
      - 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
  - 4.9% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 4.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 4.9% fail on Service brake performance
      - 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
  - 2.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
    - 2.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
  - 1.2% fail on Brake performance not tested
  - 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 1.2% fail on Rbt
      - 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance
- 3.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 3.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 3.7% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 3.7% fail on Brake pads
- 2.4% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
  - 1.2% fail on Pedal
  - 1.2% fail on Hand lever
- 2.4% fail on Air and vacuum systems (19 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  - 2.4% fail on Servos (20 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
  - 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas
    - 1.2% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
16% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 6.1% fail on Exhaust system
- 4.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure
  - 4.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 4.9% fail on Transmission
  - 3.7% fail on Drive shafts
    - 3.7% fail on Joints
  - 1.2% fail on Prop shafts
    - 1.2% fail on Prop shaft
- 3.7% fail on Chassis
  - 3.7% fail on Chassis condition
- 2.4% fail on Body
  - 2.4% fail on Mounting fixings (29 times worse than other 1995 cars)
15% fail on Suspension
- 8.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  - 3.7% fail on Linkage ball joints (8 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  - 2.4% fail on Ball joint (30 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  - 1.2% fail on Anti-roll bar
  - 1.2% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  - 1.2% fail on Linkage
- 7.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 2.4% fail on Springs
  - 2.4% fail on Coil springs
    - 2.4% fail on Coil spring
- 2.4% fail on Suspension arms
  - 1.2% fail on Ball joint
  - 1.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 1.2% fail on Wheel bearings
13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 3.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 2.4% fail on Headlamps
  - 2.4% fail on Headlamp
- 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
- 2.4% fail on Stop lamp
- 2.4% fail on Direction indicators
  - 2.4% fail on Flashing type
    - 1.2% fail on All direction indicators
    - 1.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 1.2% fail on Position lamps
  - 1.2% fail on Position lamp
7.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 7.3% fail on Seat belts
  - 7.3% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
6.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 6.1% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 6.1% fail on Compression ignition (7 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    - 3.7% fail on Emissions not tested (13 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    - 2.4% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Fluid leaks
  - 1.2% fail on Engine oil leaks
4.9% fail on Tyres
- 4.9% fail on Condition
3.7% fail on Visibility
- 2.4% fail on Washers
- 1.2% fail on Wipers
1.2% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 1.2% fail on Registration plates
1.2% fail on Steering
- 1.2% fail on Steering linkage components
  - 1.2% fail on Track rod end