Isuzu Trooper MOT Results

Registered in 1995
55.8% pass rate
from 382 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Isuzu Trooper is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Brakes (50% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 13% fail on Brake performance (60% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 8.6% fail on Rear wheels (170% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 7.9% fail on Parking brake performance (140% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.4% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.79% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.26% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 12% fail on Hydraulic systems (100% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 9.7% fail on Components (85% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 8.9% fail on Pipes (150% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.52% fail on Hoses
        • 0.26% fail on Reservoirs
      • 1.6% fail on Leaks (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.26% fail on Operation
    • 1.0% fail on Hub components
      • 1.0% fail on Brake pads
    • 0.79% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.52% fail on ABS
    • 0.26% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.26% fail on Condition
    • 0.26% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.26% fail on Operation
  • 21% fail on Suspension
    • 5.5% fail on Drive shafts (80% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 5.5% fail on Front drive shafts (86% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 5.5% fail on Constant velocity joints (88% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Front suspension joints (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 4.2% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.52% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 0.26% fail on Spring mounting
    • 3.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.8% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.52% fail on Condition (9 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.26% fail on Attachment
    • 3.7% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 3.7% fail on Condition
    • 2.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.0% fail on Coil springs
      • 1.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.79% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.79% fail on Front
    • 0.26% fail on General condition
    • 0.26% fail on Torsion bars
      • 0.26% fail on Attachment
    • 0.26% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.26% fail on Condition
    • 0.26% fail on Panhard rods
      • 0.26% fail on Attachment
  • 21% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 7.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (130% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 6.5% fail on Fog lamp (130% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Tell tale
    • 4.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.6% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.6% fail on Rear lamps
    • 4.2% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.6% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.79% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.52% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.8% fail on Battery
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.0% fail on Trailer electrical socket (11 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Horn
    • 0.52% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.52% fail on Switch
    • 0.26% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.26% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.26% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 9.4% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 7.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.9% fail on Fuel system (150% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Pipe (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Tank (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Emissions (73% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.79% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 7.6% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.7% fail on Wipers
    • 2.1% fail on Washers
    • 1.3% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.52% fail on Mirrors
  • 5.5% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 3.1% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 3.1% fail on Chassis
    • 2.1% fail on Body condition
    • 0.52% fail on Body security
    • 0.26% fail on Doors
      • 0.26% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.26% fail on Seats
      • 0.26% fail on Passengers
    • 0.26% fail on Load security
      • 0.26% fail on Access panel
  • 5.0% fail on Steering
    • 3.1% fail on Steering system
      • 1.3% fail on Steering box (7 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.52% fail on Free play
        • 0.52% fail on Steering box (8 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.0% fail on Power steering
      • 0.52% fail on Operation
      • 0.52% fail on Other components
    • 0.52% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.26% fail on Steering control
      • 0.26% fail on Steering column
    • 0.26% fail on Steering operation
  • 4.2% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 4.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.4% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.79% fail on Condition
  • 2.6% fail on Tyres
    • 1.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.79% fail on Condition
  • 2.1% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 2.1% fail on Registration plate
  • 1.3% fail on Road Wheels (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  • 0.79% fail on Towbars
    • 0.52% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.26% fail on Towbar

Search Good Garages