Isuzu Trooper MOT Results

Registered in 1994
61.3% pass rate
from 282 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1994 cars and highlighted areas where the Isuzu Trooper is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Body, chassis, structure (53% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on Transmission (120% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Drive shafts
        • 4.6% fail on Joints
        • 0.35% fail on Drive shaft
      • 1.8% fail on Prop shafts (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Joints
        • 0.71% fail on Prop shaft (6 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 3.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 2.8% fail on Chassis
      • 2.8% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.8% fail on Body (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Mounting fixings (11 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Body condition
      • 0.35% fail on Panel
    • 1.4% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.71% fail on Tank
      • 0.71% fail on System (5 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Pipe
    • 1.4% fail on Towbar (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.35% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.35% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.35% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.35% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.35% fail on Cabs
      • 0.35% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.7% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (110% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 6.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (110% worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 6.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (120% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.8% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.4% fail on Horn
      • 0.71% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.35% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.35% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.8% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.71% fail on Switch (30 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.1% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.35% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.35% fail on Dipswitch
    • 0.35% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 8.9% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 5.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 4.3% fail on Service brake performance (170% worse than other 1994 cars)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.35% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 3.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.2% fail on Rbt
          • 2.5% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.71% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 3.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.35% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 2.8% fail on Parking brake performance (150% worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 2.8% fail on Rbt (160% worse than other 1994 cars)
          • 2.8% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes (140% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.35% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.35% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.71% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.35% fail on Servos
      • 0.35% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.71% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.71% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.35% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.35% fail on Lever
    • 0.35% fail on Load sensing valves
  • 14% fail on Suspension
    • 3.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.35% fail on Suspension arm
    • 3.5% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.4% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.71% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.71% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.35% fail on Linkage
      • 0.35% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 2.5% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 2.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.1% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.71% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.35% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.71% fail on Springs
      • 0.35% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.35% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.35% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
  • 7.1% fail on Visibility
    • 3.5% fail on Wipers
    • 3.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.35% fail on Driver's view
  • 4.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.8% fail on Fluid leaks (190% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Engine oil leaks (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Exhaust emissions (70% better than other 1994 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.1% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.71% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.35% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.35% fail on Catalyst emissions
  • 3.5% fail on Steering
    • 2.1% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.1% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.71% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.35% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.71% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.71% fail on Steering play
      • 0.71% fail on Steering box
  • 3.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.1% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.4% fail on Condition
  • 1.4% fail on Tyres
    • 1.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.71% fail on Condition
  • 0.35% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.35% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.35% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.35% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages