Isuzu Trooper MOT Results
Registered in 199255.8% pass rate
from 52 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 cars and highlighted areas where the Isuzu Trooper is unusually good or bad.
-
19% fail on
Brakes
-
17% fail on
Brake performance
-
9.6% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 7.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 1.9% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
7.7% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
7.7% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 3.8% fail on Service brake performance
- 3.8% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
7.7% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
3.8% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.8% fail on
Rbt
- 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.9% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
3.8% fail on
Rbt
- 1.9% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
9.6% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 5.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 1.9% fail on Load sensing valves
-
17% fail on
Brake performance
-
19% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 7.7% fail on Exhaust system
-
7.7% fail on
Transmission
-
5.8% fail on
Drive shafts
- 5.8% fail on Joints
-
1.9% fail on
Prop shafts
- 1.9% fail on Joints
-
5.8% fail on
Drive shafts
-
3.8% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 3.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
3.8% fail on
Chassis
- 3.8% fail on Chassis condition
-
1.9% fail on
Fuel system
- 1.9% fail on Pipe
-
1.9% fail on
Towbar
- 1.9% fail on Vehicle structure
-
1.9% fail on
Body
- 1.9% fail on Mounting fixings
-
15% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
7.7% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
7.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 7.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
7.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
5.8% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 5.8% fail on Headlamp aim
- 3.8% fail on Stop lamp
-
1.9% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.9% fail on Headlamp
-
1.9% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.9% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
1.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
7.7% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
12% fail on
Suspension
-
5.8% fail on
Springs
(4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Leaf springs
(45 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Leaf spring (128 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Coil springs
- 1.9% fail on Coil spring
-
3.8% fail on
Leaf springs
(45 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
1.9% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.9% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
1.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.9% fail on Ball joint
-
1.9% fail on
Other suspension component
- 1.9% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
5.8% fail on
Springs
(4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
9.6% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
9.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
5.8% fail on
Compression ignition
(11 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (22 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Emissions not tested
-
3.8% fail on
Spark ignition
- 1.9% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 1.9% fail on Emissions not tested
-
5.8% fail on
Compression ignition
(11 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
9.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
7.7% fail on
Steering
-
3.8% fail on
Power steering
(7 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Operation
- 1.9% fail on Other components
-
1.9% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.9% fail on Track rod end
-
1.9% fail on
Steering play
- 1.9% fail on Steering box
-
3.8% fail on
Power steering
(7 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
5.8% fail on
Visibility
- 5.8% fail on Wipers
-
3.8% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
3.8% fail on
Seat belts
- 3.8% fail on Prescribed areas
-
3.8% fail on
Seat belts