Infiniti Q50 MOT Results
Registered in 201679.0% pass rate
from 671 tests in 2021
(31% worse than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Infiniti Q50 is unusually good or bad.
-
7.3% fail on
Tyres
(87% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Tread depth (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Condition
- 0.15% fail on Size/type
-
7.0% fail on
Brakes
(150% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(170% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(190% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Brake pads (190% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(180% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Brake discs (180% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(190% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Brake performance
(150% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.89% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.89% fail on
Rbt
- 0.89% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.89% fail on
Rbt
-
0.89% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.45% fail on
Parking brake performance
(3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.45% fail on
Rbt
(3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.15% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.45% fail on
Rbt
(3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.15% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.15% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.15% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.89% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.45% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Hand lever (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.30% fail on Lever
- 0.15% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
5.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(170% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Visibility
- 3.6% fail on Wipers
- 0.30% fail on Washers
-
2.2% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
1.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim
-
0.60% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.60% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.45% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.15% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.60% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.30% fail on
Headlamps
- 0.15% fail on Headlamp
- 0.15% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.15% fail on Stop lamp
- 0.15% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
2.2% fail on
Suspension
- 1.0% fail on Wheel bearings (11 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.89% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Linkage ball joints (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Ball joint (12 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
-
0.15% fail on
Springs
-
0.15% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.15% fail on Coil spring
-
0.15% fail on
Coil springs
-
0.15% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.15% fail on Ball joint
-
0.15% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.15% fail on Ball joint
-
1.6% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
1.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
1.0% fail on
Compression ignition
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.60% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.60% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.0% fail on
Compression ignition
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.45% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.45% fail on Registration plates
-
0.30% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
0.30% fail on
Doors
(7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Front passenger's door
(30 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Door condition (32 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Front passenger's door
(30 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Doors
(7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.15% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.15% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.15% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
Infiniti Q50 (2013 - 2020)
Good economy from Mercedes-sourced diesel. Hybrid offers strong performance. Well equipped.