Infiniti Q50 MOT Results

Registered in 2015

79.6% pass rate

from 809 tests in 2021

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2015 cars and highlighted areas where the Infiniti Q50 is unusually good or bad.

8.2% fail on Brakes (130% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Mechanical brake components (120% worse than other 2015 cars)
  - 4.0% fail on Brake linings and pads (120% worse than other 2015 cars)
    - 4.0% fail on Brake pads (120% worse than other 2015 cars)
  - 2.2% fail on Brake discs and drums (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    - 2.2% fail on Brake discs (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Brake performance (94% worse than other 2015 cars)
  - 1.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    - 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    - 0.12% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
  - 0.74% fail on Service brake performance
    - 0.74% fail on Rbt
      - 0.62% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.12% fail on Service brake imbalance
  - 0.37% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 0.37% fail on Rbt
      - 0.25% fail on Parking brake performance
      - 0.12% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 1.1% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (7 times worse than other 2015 cars)
  - 1.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system (15 times worse than other 2015 cars)
  - 0.62% fail on Electronic stability control (6 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.62% fail on Parking brake control (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
  - 0.62% fail on Lever (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
  - 0.49% fail on Hand lever (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
6.2% fail on Tyres
- 3.6% fail on Tread depth
- 2.8% fail on Condition
4.1% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 1.4% fail on Direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
  - 1.4% fail on Flashing type (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    - 0.99% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    - 0.37% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.87% fail on Headlamps
  - 0.87% fail on Headlamp
- 0.87% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 0.87% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.87% fail on Stop lamp
- 0.37% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 0.12% fail on Position lamps
  - 0.12% fail on Position lamp
- 0.12% fail on Hazard warning
  - 0.12% fail on Switch
2.8% fail on Visibility
- 2.1% fail on Wipers
- 0.74% fail on Washers
- 0.12% fail on Bonnet
- 0.12% fail on View to rear
  - 0.12% fail on Mirrors
2.6% fail on Suspension
- 1.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
  - 1.2% fail on Linkage ball joints (10 times worse than other 2015 cars)
  - 0.12% fail on Ball joint
- 0.87% fail on Wheel bearings (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.87% fail on Suspension arms
  - 0.87% fail on Ball joint
- 0.12% fail on Springs
  - 0.12% fail on Coil springs
    - 0.12% fail on Coil spring
0.62% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 0.37% fail on Body (9 times worse than other 2015 cars)
  - 0.37% fail on Other body component (12 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Bumpers
- 0.12% fail on Seats
  - 0.12% fail on Driver's seat
0.49% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 0.49% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 0.25% fail on Spark ignition
    - 0.25% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  - 0.25% fail on Compression ignition
    - 0.25% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
0.37% fail on Road Wheels
- 0.37% fail on Attachment
0.12% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 0.12% fail on Registration plates