Hyundai Veloster MOT Results
Registered in 201266.9% pass rate
from 1,533 tests in 2021
(11% worse than other 2012 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Veloster is unusually good or bad.
-
13% fail on
Suspension
(35% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
5.0% fail on
Suspension arms
(61% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 4.5% fail on Ball joint dust cover (11 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Ball joint (75% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Pins and bushes (79% better than other 2012 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Springs
-
4.3% fail on
Coil springs
- 4.3% fail on Coil spring
-
4.3% fail on
Coil springs
-
4.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(160% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Linkage ball joints (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.98% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (130% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.85% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Ball joint dust cover (180% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.065% fail on Linkage
- 0.78% fail on Wheel bearings (130% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.20% fail on Ball joint dust cover (6 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.065% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.065% fail on Ball joint
-
5.0% fail on
Suspension arms
(61% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
9.7% fail on
Brakes
(61% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Brake performance
(100% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.065% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
-
2.3% fail on
Parking brake performance
(4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Rbt
(4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (8 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.065% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
2.3% fail on
Rbt
(4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.98% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.98% fail on
Rbt
- 0.85% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.13% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.98% fail on
Rbt
-
0.26% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.26% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.20% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.13% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.26% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.20% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
4.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.8% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.8% fail on Brake pads
-
0.65% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.65% fail on Brake discs
-
0.20% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.065% fail on Cable
- 0.065% fail on Lever
- 0.065% fail on Linkage
-
2.8% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.46% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.46% fail on Lever
-
0.33% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.33% fail on Hand lever
- 0.13% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.13% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.13% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.065% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.065% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.065% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.065% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.065% fail on Electronic stability control
-
5.3% fail on
Brake performance
(100% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
7.8% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
4.9% fail on
Headlamps
(110% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Headlamp (120% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.52% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.46% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (67% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.33% fail on
Direction indicators
(80% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.33% fail on
Flashing type
(80% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.065% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.33% fail on
Flashing type
(80% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.13% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.065% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.065% fail on Stop lamp
-
0.065% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.065% fail on Reversing lamps
-
4.9% fail on
Headlamps
(110% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
6.9% fail on
Steering
(3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
6.1% fail on
Steering linkage components
(3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 5.9% fail on Track rod end (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.065% fail on Ball joint
- 0.065% fail on Locking devices
-
0.78% fail on
Steering gear
(5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Steering rack (6 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Steering play
(5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Steering rack (5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
6.1% fail on
Steering linkage components
(3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Tyres
- 2.3% fail on Tread depth
- 2.2% fail on Condition
- 0.065% fail on Size/type
-
3.2% fail on
Visibility
- 2.2% fail on Washers
- 1.0% fail on Wipers (54% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.98% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(52% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.91% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(53% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.85% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.52% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.33% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.065% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.065% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.065% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
-
0.85% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.065% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.065% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
0.91% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(53% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.52% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(79% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.33% fail on
Transmission
(70% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.33% fail on
Drive shafts
(68% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Joints (68% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.33% fail on
Drive shafts
(68% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Bumpers
- 0.065% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.33% fail on
Transmission
(70% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.52% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.39% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.13% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.13% fail on Condition
-
0.13% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.13% fail on Registration plates
-
0.065% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.065% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
Hyundai Veloster (2012 - 2015)
Punchy Turbo version. Distinctive looks. Decent specification.