MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Hyundai » Tucson » 2017

Hyundai Tucson MOT Results

Registered in 2017
87.5% pass rate
from 24,454 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Tucson is unusually good or bad.

  • 5.0% fail on Visibility (35% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Wipers (54% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.79% fail on Washers (19% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.049% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.049% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.041% fail on Bonnet (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.020% fail on View to rear
      • 0.020% fail on Mirrors
  • 3.3% fail on Brakes (61% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Mechanical brake components (38% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Brake linings and pads (57% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Brake pads (57% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.016% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.16% fail on Brake discs and drums (52% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Brake discs (52% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.020% fail on Lever (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.0041% fail on Cable
    • 0.67% fail on Brake performance (40% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.37% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.0082% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.21% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.21% fail on Rbt
          • 0.16% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.061% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.13% fail on Parking brake performance (180% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Rbt (190% worse than other 2017 cars)
          • 0.11% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
          • 0.0082% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.0041% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.0041% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.0041% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.094% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.094% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.074% fail on Service brake performance (180% worse than other 2017 cars)
          • 0.020% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.020% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.66% fail on Parking brake control (7 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Lever (7 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Electronic parking brake (6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Hand lever (9 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Pedal
    • 0.0082% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.0041% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.0041% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.0082% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.0041% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.0041% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 2.8% fail on Tyres (18% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Tread depth (17% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Condition (47% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.020% fail on Size/type
  • 1.7% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (35% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.97% fail on Headlamp aim (26% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.94% fail on Headlamp aim (25% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.020% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.39% fail on Headlamps (23% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Headlamp (31% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.074% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.020% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.14% fail on Direction indicators (42% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Flashing type (42% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Side repeaters (39% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.037% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.14% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.14% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.14% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.061% fail on Stop lamp (82% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.045% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.033% fail on Trailer electrical socket (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.0082% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.0041% fail on Horn
    • 0.041% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (80% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.016% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.016% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.012% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.012% fail on Position lamp
  • 0.23% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (57% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Exhaust emissions (59% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Spark ignition (65% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.070% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (65% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.041% fail on Catalyst emissions (61% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.0041% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.11% fail on Compression ignition (49% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.0041% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.016% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.016% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.0041% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 0.18% fail on Suspension (79% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.078% fail on Suspension arms (66% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.061% fail on Pins and bushes (50% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.012% fail on Ball joint (84% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.0041% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.0041% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.041% fail on Anti-roll bars (70% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.012% fail on Linkage ball joints (80% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.012% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.0082% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0041% fail on Linkage
      • 0.0041% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 0.029% fail on Shock absorbers (72% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.016% fail on Wheel bearings (70% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.0082% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.0041% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.0041% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.0041% fail on Axles
      • 0.0041% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.0041% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.0041% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.0041% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.0041% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.0041% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 0.17% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.17% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.16% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (34% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.13% fail on Condition
      • 0.012% fail on Requirements
    • 0.016% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (84% better than other 2017 cars)
  • 0.13% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.13% fail on Attachment
  • 0.11% fail on Body, chassis, structure (66% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.029% fail on Transmission (72% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Drive shafts (75% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.025% fail on Joints (74% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.0041% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.0041% fail on Joints
    • 0.025% fail on Doors
      • 0.012% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.012% fail on Door condition
      • 0.0082% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.0082% fail on Door condition
      • 0.0041% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.0041% fail on Door condition
    • 0.016% fail on Body
      • 0.0082% fail on Panel
      • 0.0082% fail on Other body component
    • 0.012% fail on Exhaust system (83% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.0082% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.0082% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.0082% fail on Spare wheel condition (7 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.0041% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.0041% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.0041% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.0041% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.0041% fail on Seats
      • 0.0041% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 0.053% fail on Steering (65% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.049% fail on Steering linkage components (52% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.0041% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.0041% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.0041% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.0041% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages