MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Hyundai » Tucson » 2016

Hyundai Tucson MOT Results

Registered in 2016
85.5% pass rate
from 20,931 tests in 2021
(11% better than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Tucson is unusually good or bad.

  • 5.2% fail on Visibility (31% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Wipers (48% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.96% fail on Washers
    • 0.062% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.062% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.048% fail on Bonnet (170% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.024% fail on View to rear
      • 0.024% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.0096% fail on Driver's view
  • 4.2% fail on Brakes (50% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Mechanical brake components (40% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Brake linings and pads (62% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Brake pads (62% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.014% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.25% fail on Brake discs and drums (48% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Brake discs (48% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.029% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.0096% fail on Cable
        • 0.0096% fail on Lever
        • 0.0096% fail on Linkage (10 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Brake performance (61% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.65% fail on Rbt (sp) (190% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.081% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.0048% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 0.46% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.43% fail on Rbt (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.39% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.033% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.014% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.014% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.0096% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.0048% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.0096% fail on Decelerometer (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.0096% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (15 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Service brake performance (54% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Rbt (55% better than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.17% fail on Service brake performance (50% better than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.014% fail on Service brake imbalance (82% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.0048% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.0048% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.072% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.062% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.038% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.024% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.0048% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.0048% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.0048% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.067% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.59% fail on Parking brake control (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Lever (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Electronic parking brake (9 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (160% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Hand lever (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.043% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.029% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.014% fail on Electronic braking system
      • 0.0096% fail on Electronic stability control (81% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.024% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.0096% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.0048% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.0048% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.0048% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.0048% fail on Leaks
    • 0.0048% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.0048% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 2.9% fail on Tyres (25% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.1% fail on Condition (49% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.019% fail on Size/type
  • 2.1% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (39% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.038% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.50% fail on Headlamps (31% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Headlamp (38% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (91% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0096% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.17% fail on Direction indicators (54% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Flashing type (54% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Side repeaters (50% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.024% fail on Individual direction indicators (71% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.0048% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.15% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.15% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.15% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.062% fail on Stop lamp (90% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.053% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (85% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.043% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.033% fail on Trailer electrical socket (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0048% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.0048% fail on Horn
    • 0.014% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.014% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.0048% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 0.37% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (56% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on Exhaust emissions (56% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Compression ignition (41% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.019% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.0096% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (86% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.0048% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 0.16% fail on Spark ignition (67% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.086% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (71% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.067% fail on Catalyst emissions (61% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.0096% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.0096% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.0096% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.29% fail on Suspension (86% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Suspension arms (66% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint (46% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.048% fail on Pins and bushes (80% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Ball joint dust cover (73% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.048% fail on Anti-roll bars (76% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.019% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.014% fail on Linkage ball joints (81% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0048% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.0048% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.0048% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.038% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.029% fail on Shock absorbers (79% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.014% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.0096% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.0048% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.0048% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.0048% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 0.20% fail on Body, chassis, structure (64% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Doors (180% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Other passenger's door (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.062% fail on Door condition (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.029% fail on Front passenger's door (200% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.029% fail on Door condition (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.014% fail on Door condition
    • 0.033% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.029% fail on Transmission (87% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.029% fail on Drive shafts (86% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.029% fail on Joints (86% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.014% fail on Body
      • 0.0096% fail on Other body component
      • 0.0048% fail on Panel
    • 0.0096% fail on Exhaust system (94% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.0048% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.0048% fail on Tank
    • 0.0048% fail on Undertray
  • 0.16% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.16% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.14% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.14% fail on Attachment
  • 0.13% fail on Steering (50% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Steering linkage components (39% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Track rod end
  • 0.11% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (62% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.091% fail on Seat belts (45% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.091% fail on Condition
    • 0.019% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (84% better than other 2016 cars)
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages