Hyundai Tucson MOT Results
Registered in 201581.7% pass rate
from 5,000 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2015 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Tucson is unusually good or bad.
-
8.1% fail on
Brakes
(130% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(62% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(89% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Brake pads (89% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Brake linings
-
0.40% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.40% fail on Brake discs
-
0.020% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.020% fail on Lever
-
3.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(89% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Brake performance
(2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (17 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.040% fail on Gradient tester (sp) (48 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Parking brake performance
(10 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Rbt
(10 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance (11 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.080% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.020% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.020% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
1.8% fail on
Rbt
(10 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Service brake performance
(64% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Rbt
(67% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Service brake performance (65% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.020% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.020% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.20% fail on
Rbt
(67% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.10% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.080% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.060% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.040% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.020% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.080% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.060% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
2.5% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Parking brake control
(12 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Lever (11 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Electronic parking brake (19 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(9 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Hand lever (15 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Pedal
- 0.040% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.040% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.040% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.020% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.020% fail on Reservoirs
-
0.020% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.020% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
3.6% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(62% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Tyres
- 2.3% fail on Tread depth
- 1.6% fail on Condition (27% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.060% fail on Size/type
-
3.5% fail on
Visibility
- 2.5% fail on Wipers
- 0.82% fail on Washers (41% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Bonnet (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.080% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.080% fail on Windscreen
- 0.020% fail on Driver's view
-
2.7% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(41% better than other 2015 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.040% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.88% fail on
Headlamps
- 0.84% fail on Headlamp
- 0.020% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.020% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
-
0.22% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.22% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.22% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.22% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.080% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (85% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.080% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.080% fail on Trailer electrical socket (8 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.060% fail on
Direction indicators
(86% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.060% fail on
Flashing type
(86% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.060% fail on Side repeaters (80% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.060% fail on
Flashing type
(86% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.040% fail on Stop lamp (95% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.020% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.020% fail on Position lamp
-
0.020% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.020% fail on Reversing lamps
-
1.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
1.5% fail on
Suspension
(54% better than other 2015 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.0% fail on Ball joint (110% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.060% fail on Pins and bushes (85% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.060% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.020% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.22% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.14% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.060% fail on Ball joint
- 0.040% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
-
0.10% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.080% fail on Ball joint
- 0.020% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.060% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.020% fail on Shock absorbers
-
1.1% fail on
Suspension arms
-
0.62% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(46% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.60% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(46% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.42% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.36% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.060% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.18% fail on
Spark ignition
(72% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (61% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.42% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.020% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.020% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
-
0.60% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(46% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.58% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(38% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.42% fail on
Doors
(6 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.38% fail on
Other passenger's door
(13 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Door condition (14 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.040% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.040% fail on Door condition
-
0.020% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.020% fail on Door condition
-
0.38% fail on
Other passenger's door
(13 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.060% fail on Bumpers
-
0.040% fail on
Transmission
(90% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.040% fail on
Drive shafts
(89% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.040% fail on Joints (89% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.040% fail on
Drive shafts
(89% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.020% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.020% fail on Tank
- 0.020% fail on Undertray
-
0.42% fail on
Doors
(6 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.46% fail on
Steering
-
0.44% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.44% fail on Track rod end
-
0.020% fail on
Power steering
- 0.020% fail on Operation
-
0.44% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
0.28% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.28% fail on Registration plates
-
0.16% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.16% fail on Attachment
-
0.14% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(63% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.080% fail on Condition
- 0.040% fail on Requirements
- 0.020% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.12% fail on
Seat belts
Read the Honest John Review
-
Hyundai Tucson (2015 - 2021)
Cabin is spacious and comfortable. Lots of family appeal with affordable running costs and huge boot.