Hyundai Tucson MOT Results

Registered in 2010
61.1% pass rate
from 357 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Tucson is unusually good or bad.

  • 13% fail on Suspension
    • 3.9% fail on Springs
      • 3.9% fail on Coil springs
        • 3.9% fail on Coil spring
    • 3.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.4% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.56% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.7% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Macpherson strut (14 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (37 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.84% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.84% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.56% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.28% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.28% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.28% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 11% fail on Brakes (61% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.84% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.28% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.28% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.28% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt
          • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.28% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.28% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.28% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.28% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.28% fail on Service brake performance
    • 3.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.84% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.84% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.56% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on Cable
        • 0.28% fail on Lever
    • 2.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.1% fail on Lever (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.84% fail on Hydraulic systems (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.84% fail on Brake fluid (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.28% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 10% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (98% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.5% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.84% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.56% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.56% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.28% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.28% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.56% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.56% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.28% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.28% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.28% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.28% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.28% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.28% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.28% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 7.0% fail on Body, chassis, structure (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Transmission (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.9% fail on Drive shafts (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 5.9% fail on Joints (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.28% fail on Joints
    • 0.84% fail on Exhaust system
  • 5.9% fail on Visibility
    • 2.8% fail on Wipers
    • 2.0% fail on Washers
    • 0.56% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.56% fail on Condition of glass (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Windscreen (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 2.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.0% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.28% fail on Particulate filter
        • 0.28% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.84% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.84% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 2.2% fail on Tyres (65% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.56% fail on Condition (81% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 1.4% fail on Steering
    • 1.1% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.1% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.28% fail on Power steering
      • 0.28% fail on Other components
  • 0.84% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.84% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.84% fail on Condition
  • 0.28% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.28% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages