Hyundai Tucson MOT Results
Registered in 200968.8% pass rate
from 914 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Tucson is unusually good or bad.
-
12% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(25% better than other 2009 cars)
-
5.0% fail on
Position lamps
- 4.8% fail on Front lamps (61% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.11% fail on All position lamps
- 0.11% fail on Rear lamps
- 3.5% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim (45% better than other 2009 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(160% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Fog lamp (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Stop lamp (63% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.55% fail on
Headlamps
(79% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Headlamp (78% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.33% fail on
Direction indicators
(79% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.33% fail on
Flashing type
(79% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.11% fail on Individual lamps
-
0.33% fail on
Flashing type
(79% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Electrical wiring (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Battery
-
5.0% fail on
Position lamps
-
10% fail on
Suspension
-
4.2% fail on
Suspension arms
(120% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Attachment
-
3.0% fail on
Coil springs
- 3.0% fail on Condition
- 1.3% fail on Front suspension joints (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.98% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(61% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.77% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (62% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.88% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.88% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 0.88% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
0.88% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
0.55% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.55% fail on Condition
-
0.44% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.33% fail on Front
- 0.11% fail on Rear
-
0.11% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.11% fail on Condition
-
0.11% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.11% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.11% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.11% fail on Condition
-
4.2% fail on
Suspension arms
(120% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
10% fail on
Brakes
(58% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Brake performance
(60% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Rear wheels (93% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Parking brake performance (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Front wheels
- 0.22% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.22% fail on Brake operation (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.11% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
3.7% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Components
(4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Pipes (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Hoses
- 0.11% fail on Leaks
-
3.6% fail on
Components
(4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Hub components
- 2.4% fail on Brake pads
- 0.77% fail on Brake discs
- 0.11% fail on Brake calipers
-
1.4% fail on
Parking brake
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.22% fail on ABS
- 0.22% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.11% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.11% fail on
Pedal
- 0.11% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.11% fail on
Pedal
-
0.11% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.11% fail on Linkage
-
4.6% fail on
Brake performance
(60% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
5.8% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 4.3% fail on Wipers (52% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Washers
- 0.77% fail on Windscreen
-
4.9% fail on
Tyres
(31% better than other 2009 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Tread depth
- 1.3% fail on Condition (62% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Valve stem
-
2.3% fail on
Steering
(92% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Power steering
(15 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Other components (45 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Rams (53 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Operation
- 0.11% fail on Pipes and hoses
-
0.88% fail on
Steering system
- 0.55% fail on Track rod end
- 0.22% fail on Steering rack
- 0.11% fail on Ball joint
- 0.11% fail on Locking devices
-
1.5% fail on
Power steering
(15 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 1.5% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.22% fail on Emissions
-
0.22% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.22% fail on Cap
- 0.22% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.44% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.44% fail on Attachment
-
0.44% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.22% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.22% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
0.22% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.22% fail on Requirements (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
-
0.11% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
0.11% fail on
Doors
- 0.11% fail on Passengers front
-
0.11% fail on
Doors
-
0.11% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.11% fail on Registration plate
Read the Honest John Review
-
Hyundai Tucson (2004 - 2009)
A satisfying drive in diesel manual form. Very well equipped and roomy. Five-year unlimited mileage warranty.