Hyundai Tucson MOT Results

Registered in 2009
68.8% pass rate
from 914 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Tucson is unusually good or bad.

  • 12% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (25% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.8% fail on Front lamps (61% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.11% fail on Rear lamps
    • 3.5% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim (45% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Fog lamp (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Stop lamp (63% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Headlamps (79% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Headlamp (78% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Direction indicators (79% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Flashing type (79% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.11% fail on Individual lamps
    • 0.22% fail on Electrical wiring (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Battery
  • 10% fail on Suspension
    • 4.2% fail on Suspension arms (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment
    • 3.0% fail on Coil springs
      • 3.0% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Front suspension joints (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.98% fail on Anti-roll bars (61% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.77% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (62% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.88% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.88% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.88% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 0.55% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.55% fail on Condition
    • 0.44% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.33% fail on Front
      • 0.11% fail on Rear
    • 0.11% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
    • 0.11% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.11% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.11% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
  • 10% fail on Brakes (58% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Brake performance (60% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Rear wheels (93% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Parking brake performance (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.22% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.22% fail on Brake operation (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.11% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.7% fail on Hydraulic systems (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Components (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.4% fail on Pipes (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Hoses
      • 0.11% fail on Leaks
    • 3.1% fail on Hub components
      • 2.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.77% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.11% fail on Brake calipers
    • 1.4% fail on Parking brake (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on ABS
    • 0.22% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.11% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.11% fail on Pedal
        • 0.11% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.11% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.11% fail on Linkage
  • 5.8% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.3% fail on Wipers (52% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.77% fail on Windscreen
  • 4.9% fail on Tyres (31% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.3% fail on Condition (62% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Valve stem
  • 2.3% fail on Steering (92% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Power steering (15 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Other components (45 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Rams (53 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Operation
      • 0.11% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.88% fail on Steering system
      • 0.55% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.22% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.11% fail on Locking devices
  • 2.0% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 1.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.22% fail on Emissions
    • 0.22% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.22% fail on Cap
    • 0.22% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.44% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.44% fail on Attachment
  • 0.44% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.22% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.22% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
    • 0.22% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.22% fail on Requirements (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.11% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.11% fail on Doors
      • 0.11% fail on Passengers front
  • 0.11% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.11% fail on Registration plate
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages