MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Hyundai » Tucson » 2009

Hyundai Tucson MOT Results

Registered in 2009
57.4% pass rate
from 903 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Tucson is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Suspension
    • 9.3% fail on Suspension arms (99% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Pins and bushes (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Ball joint (67% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 4.0% fail on Springs
      • 4.0% fail on Coil springs
        • 4.0% fail on Coil spring
    • 3.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.7% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.66% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.44% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.33% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.89% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.66% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.55% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.55% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.44% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.55% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.44% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.11% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.55% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.22% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.22% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint (12 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 17% fail on Brakes (91% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 9.1% fail on Brake performance (94% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 6.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 5.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.44% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt
          • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.33% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.33% fail on Decelerometer (23 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.33% fail on Service brake performance (23 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Parking brake performance (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 2.0% fail on Parking brake performance (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.22% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.11% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.55% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake performance not tested (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.8% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.8% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.11% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.11% fail on Lever
    • 1.6% fail on Parking brake control (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Lever (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.00% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.44% fail on Pedal
    • 0.66% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.66% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.33% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.22% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.11% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.22% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.11% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.11% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 11% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.22% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.4% fail on Stop lamp (58% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.11% fail on Switch
    • 1.00% fail on Electrical equipment (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Battery(ies) (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Horn
      • 0.11% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.11% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.44% fail on Direction indicators (78% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Flashing type (78% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.22% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.22% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.22% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 6.4% fail on Visibility
    • 3.2% fail on Wipers
    • 2.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.11% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.11% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.11% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.11% fail on View to rear
      • 0.11% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.3% fail on Compression ignition (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.11% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.11% fail on Particulate filter
      • 1.1% fail on Spark ignition (60% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.66% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.33% fail on Catalyst emissions (75% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.33% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.22% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.11% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.11% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.11% fail on Undertray
  • 4.9% fail on Tyres
    • 3.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.3% fail on Condition (55% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Size/type
  • 4.4% fail on Steering (87% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.4% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.6% fail on Power steering (15 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Pipes and hoses (30 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Other components (14 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Rams (77 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Operation
    • 0.44% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.44% fail on Steering rack
  • 4.2% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 2.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.2% fail on Transmission
      • 1.2% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.2% fail on Joints
    • 0.33% fail on Doors
      • 0.33% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.33% fail on Door condition
    • 0.22% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.11% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.11% fail on Sub-frame condition
      • 0.11% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.11% fail on Chassis
      • 0.11% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.11% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.11% fail on Tank
    • 0.11% fail on Bumpers
  • 2.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.00% fail on Condition (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Requirements (36 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.78% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.78% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.22% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.22% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages