Hyundai Tucson MOT Results

Registered in 2009
62.9% pass rate
from 1,001 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Tucson is unusually good or bad.

  • 13% fail on Brakes (68% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Brake performance (58% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.30% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.70% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.100% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.100% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.100% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.100% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.100% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.90% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.70% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.70% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.100% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.100% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.100% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.100% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.50% fail on Brake performance not tested (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.1% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.1% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.1% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.00% fail on Hand lever (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.100% fail on Pedal
    • 1.1% fail on Parking brake control (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.50% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.50% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.20% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.20% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.100% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 13% fail on Suspension
    • 7.6% fail on Suspension arms (91% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Ball joint (98% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Pins and bushes (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Suspension arm (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.00% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.60% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.100% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.100% fail on Linkage
      • 0.100% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.2% fail on Springs (48% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Coil springs (48% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Coil spring (48% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.00% fail on Other suspension component (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.90% fail on Ball joint (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.100% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.50% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.20% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.100% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.40% fail on Shock absorbers (73% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.100% fail on Axles
      • 0.100% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.100% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.100% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.100% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.100% fail on Sub-frame
  • 11% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (24% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Position lamps (56% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Position lamp (59% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.30% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.6% fail on Stop lamp (56% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamps (53% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp (51% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.80% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.40% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.30% fail on Trailer electrical socket (26 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.100% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.60% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.60% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.60% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.100% fail on Switch
    • 0.30% fail on Direction indicators (83% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Flashing type (83% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.20% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.20% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 5.3% fail on Tyres
    • 4.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.2% fail on Condition (60% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.100% fail on Size/type
  • 4.9% fail on Visibility
    • 2.6% fail on Wipers
    • 2.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.20% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.100% fail on Driver's view
  • 4.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.4% fail on Compression ignition (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.90% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.20% fail on Emission control equipment (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.100% fail on Particulate filter
          • 0.100% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.20% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.100% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 1.5% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.30% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.20% fail on Catalyst emissions (80% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.100% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.100% fail on Other emission control equipment
  • 3.5% fail on Steering (83% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.8% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.100% fail on Locking devices
    • 1.7% fail on Power steering (19 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Other components (48 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.100% fail on Operation
      • 0.100% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.100% fail on Pump
      • 0.100% fail on Rams
    • 0.30% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.30% fail on Steering rack
  • 2.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 1.5% fail on Transmission
      • 1.2% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.1% fail on Joints
        • 0.100% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.30% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.30% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.100% fail on Doors
      • 0.100% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.100% fail on Door condition
    • 0.100% fail on Undertray
  • 1.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.70% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.70% fail on Condition
    • 0.40% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.40% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.40% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.30% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.30% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages