Hyundai Tucson MOT Results
Registered in 200858.1% pass rate
from 930 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Tucson is unusually good or bad.
-
18% fail on
Suspension
-
8.9% fail on
Suspension arms
(81% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Pins and bushes (150% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Ball joint
- 0.43% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.32% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
3.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.3% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 1.2% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.75% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.43% fail on Ball joint
- 0.11% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.11% fail on Linkage
-
3.3% fail on
Springs
(44% better than other 2008 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Coil springs
(44% better than other 2008 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Coil spring (44% better than other 2008 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Coil springs
(44% better than other 2008 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Sub-frames
(4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Sub-frame (8 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
0.97% fail on
Macpherson strut
(3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Macpherson strut (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.11% fail on Ball joint
-
0.75% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.54% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Other suspension component (9 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.65% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 0.54% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.11% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.11% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.11% fail on Suspension rod
-
8.9% fail on
Suspension arms
(81% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
13% fail on
Brakes
(34% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
7.5% fail on
Brake performance
(42% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.1% fail on
Rbt
- 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.65% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.11% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.11% fail on Service brake performance
-
3.1% fail on
Rbt
-
3.1% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 2.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.22% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
1.3% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.97% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.65% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.32% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (50 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.97% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.75% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.65% fail on
Rbt
- 0.54% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.11% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.11% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.11% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.65% fail on
Rbt
- 0.43% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
3.2% fail on
Service brake performance
- 4.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes (200% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.0% fail on Brake pads
-
1.3% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.3% fail on Brake discs
-
0.11% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.11% fail on Cable
-
2.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.65% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.65% fail on Lever
-
0.54% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.32% fail on Hand lever
- 0.22% fail on Pedal
-
0.43% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.43% fail on Brake fluid (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.32% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.11% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.22% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.11% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.11% fail on Servos
-
0.11% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.11% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
7.5% fail on
Brake performance
(42% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
11% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 4.7% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.8% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
- 2.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.75% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.75% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.75% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.75% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.65% fail on
Headlamps
(82% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Headlamp (81% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.65% fail on
Direction indicators
(70% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.65% fail on
Flashing type
(70% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.65% fail on
Flashing type
(70% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.54% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.43% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.11% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.22% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.22% fail on Position lamp
-
6.9% fail on
Visibility
- 4.5% fail on Wipers (56% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Washers
- 0.11% fail on Bonnet
-
0.11% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.11% fail on Windscreen
-
0.11% fail on
View to rear
- 0.11% fail on Mirrors
-
5.8% fail on
Tyres
- 3.4% fail on Tread depth
- 2.7% fail on Condition
-
5.5% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
4.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
3.3% fail on
Spark ignition
- 1.9% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 1.1% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.65% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.22% fail on
Emission control equipment
(6 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Particulate filter
- 0.11% fail on Oxygen sensor
- 0.11% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
1.7% fail on
Compression ignition
- 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.22% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.22% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.22% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.11% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.11% fail on Other emission control equipment
- 0.11% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.11% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
-
3.3% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.65% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.65% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
4.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.2% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(32% better than other 2008 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.54% fail on
Transmission
(80% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.54% fail on
Drive shafts
(79% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Joints (79% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.54% fail on
Drive shafts
(79% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Chassis
- 0.22% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.22% fail on
Doors
-
0.22% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.22% fail on Door condition
-
0.22% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.11% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.11% fail on Tank
-
0.11% fail on
Seats
- 0.11% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.11% fail on Undertray
-
4.1% fail on
Steering
-
2.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.7% fail on Track rod end
- 0.22% fail on Ball joint
- 0.22% fail on Locking devices (6 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Power steering
(8 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.86% fail on Other components (14 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Pipes and hoses (18 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Operation
- 0.11% fail on Rams
-
0.43% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.32% fail on Steering rack
- 0.11% fail on Operation
-
2.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
1.6% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
1.1% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.75% fail on Condition
- 0.32% fail on Requirements (11 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.86% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.1% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.54% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.54% fail on Registration plates
-
0.11% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.11% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
Hyundai Tucson (2004 - 2009)
A satisfying drive in diesel manual form. Very well equipped and roomy. Five-year unlimited mileage warranty.