Hyundai Tucson MOT Results

Registered in 2004
49.4% pass rate
from 925 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Tucson is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Suspension (40% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 14% fail on Suspension arms (130% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 8.8% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 5.9% fail on Pins and bushes (140% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Suspension arm (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.22% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 5.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.4% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.6% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.76% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.32% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.32% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.22% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.22% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 3.1% fail on Wheel bearings (95% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Sub-frames (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Sub-frame (10 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 2.5% fail on Macpherson strut (9 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (13 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Macpherson strut (6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.9% fail on Other suspension component (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (10 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.4% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.43% fail on Springs (89% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Coil springs (89% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.43% fail on Coil spring (89% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Axles
      • 0.11% fail on Axle
  • 19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.43% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.1% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.7% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.97% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.97% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.97% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.11% fail on Switch
    • 0.97% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.65% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.22% fail on Horn
      • 0.11% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.32% fail on Direction indicators (88% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Flashing type (88% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Individual direction indicators (82% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.11% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 5.7% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (50% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (66% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.65% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.11% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
      • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance (56% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (59% better than other 2004 cars)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance (55% better than other 2004 cars)
          • 0.11% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.11% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.11% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.97% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.76% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.43% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.32% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (18 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Brake performance not tested (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.97% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.86% fail on Rbt
          • 0.86% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.11% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.11% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 4.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 4.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.0% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.11% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.9% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.8% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.11% fail on Brake drums
    • 1.3% fail on Parking brake control (140% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Lever (150% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.65% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.54% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.11% fail on Pedal
    • 0.65% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.54% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.43% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.22% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.11% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.11% fail on Brake fluid
  • 8.0% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.8% fail on Transmission (50% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Drive shafts (54% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Joints (56% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.22% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.11% fail on Prop shaft
        • 0.11% fail on Joints
    • 0.97% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.32% fail on Tank
      • 0.22% fail on Pipe
      • 0.22% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.22% fail on System
    • 0.43% fail on Chassis
      • 0.43% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.43% fail on Undertray (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.22% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.22% fail on Doors
      • 0.11% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.11% fail on Door condition
      • 0.11% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.11% fail on Door condition
    • 0.11% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.11% fail on Body
      • 0.11% fail on Other body component
    • 0.11% fail on Seats
      • 0.11% fail on Driver's seat
  • 7.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 7.1% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.5% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 1.6% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.54% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 2.9% fail on Compression ignition (73% worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.32% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.22% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.11% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
    • 0.65% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.43% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.11% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.11% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.11% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.11% fail on Undertray
  • 7.6% fail on Visibility
    • 4.3% fail on Wipers
    • 3.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.22% fail on Driver's view
  • 7.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (120% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (170% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Seat belts (87% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.22% fail on Requirements
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment
    • 0.11% fail on Airbags
      • 0.11% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 6.7% fail on Tyres
    • 5.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.9% fail on Condition
    • 0.22% fail on Size/type
  • 4.2% fail on Steering
    • 2.6% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.7% fail on Track rod end (49% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.11% fail on Locking devices
    • 1.3% fail on Power steering (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Operation (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Pipes and hoses (6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Pump
      • 0.11% fail on Other components
    • 0.32% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.32% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.2% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.65% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.65% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages